free NBA basketball picks
Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Premium Services | Contact Us

Most successful 5-Man Units by Team

We list the top twenty most used units for each team on the respective team page (see for example the Philadelphia 76ers units page). This feature though sorts the 5-man performance to highlight the top seven units by team in terms of pure +/- total.

Most Productive Five-Man Floor Units (as of 3/21/05, sorted by +/- rating)
#
Team
Unit
Min
Off
Def
+/-
W
L
W%
1
ATL
 Delk-Diaw-J.Smith-Harrington-Walker 24  63  45  +18   5 1
83 %
2
ATL
 Delk-Ivey-D.Smith-Childress-Collier 19  +13   1 0
100 %
3
ATL
 Ivey-Childress-Harrington-Walker-Drobnjak 31  65  54  +11   7 4
63 %
4
ATL
 Ivey-Barry-Childress-McCoy-Drobnjak 17  +11   2 0
100 %
5
ATL
 Anderson-Delk-Childress-Harrington-Drobnjak 42  86  76  +10   7 4
63 %
6
ATL
 Delk-Diaw-Harrington-Walker-Willis 24  48  38  +10   3 1
75 %
7
ATL
 Delk-Ivey-Childress-Walker-Drobnjak 12  28  18  +10   5 1
83 %
1
BOS
 Payton-Allen-Pierce-LaFrentz-Blount 200  455  400  +55   10 7
58 %
2
BOS
 Payton-Allen-Pierce-Walker-LaFrentz 73  172  140  +32   5 1
83 %
3
BOS
 Payton-Davis-Pierce-Walker-LaFrentz 115  279  249  +30   6 2
75 %
4
BOS
 Banks-West-Davis-Jefferson-Blount 38  86  65  +21   5 3
62 %
5
BOS
 Payton-Allen-Welsch-Davis-McCarty 30  +21   1 0
100 %
6
BOS
 Banks-Davis-Pierce-McCarty-Jefferson 28  77  57  +20   6 3
66 %
7
BOS
 Payton-Welsch-Pierce-McCarty-Blount 16  56  39  +17   8 2
80 %
1
CHA
 Knight-Rush-Wallace-Ely-Brezec 45  99  75  +24   4 2
66 %
2
CHA
 Knight-Hart-Wallace-Okafor-Brezec 52  93  80  +13   3 5
37 %
3
CHA
 Knight-Bogans-Rush-Smith-Okafor 26  13  +13   1 0
100 %
4
CHA
 Hart-Carroll-Kapono-Allen-Ely 26  13  +13   2 0
100 %
5
CHA
 Bogans-Rush-Kapono-Okafor-Brezec 15  +13   2 0
100 %
6
CHA
 Knight-Hart-Wallace-Ely-Brezec 21  46  34  +12   2 2
50 %
7
CHA
 Knight-Smith-Kapono-Wallace-T.Smith 18  +10   3 0
100 %
1
CHI
 Duhon-Hinrich-Deng-Davis-Curry 354  667  604  +63   17 11
60 %
2
CHI
 Hinrich-Gordon-Deng-Harrington-Chandler 18  46  23  +23   9 2
81 %
3
CHI
 Duhon-Gordon-Griffin-Harrington-Chandler 18  42  19  +23   6 2
75 %
4
CHI
 Duhon-Gordon-Nocioni-Harrington-Chandler 54  118  98  +20   5 8
38 %
5
CHI
 Duhon-Hinrich-Deng-Davis-Chandler 43  85  65  +20   6 3
66 %
6
CHI
 Hinrich-Gordon-Deng-Harrington-Curry 28  74  54  +20   3 2
60 %
7
CHI
 Duhon-Gordon-Nocioni-Davis-Chandler 42  94  75  +19   9 3
75 %
1
CLE
 McInnis-Newble-James-Gooden-Ilgauskas 746  1506  1441  +65   23 24
48 %
2
CLE
 McInnis-Snow-James-Gooden-Ilgauskas 192  412  350  +62   19 13
59 %
3
CLE
 Harris-Snow-James-Gooden-Ilgauskas 58  130  81  +49   11 4
73 %
4
CLE
 McInnis-Pavlovic-James-Gooden-Ilgauskas 147  316  291  +25   8 5
61 %
5
CLE
 McInnis-Snow-Gooden-Traylor-Ilgauskas 16  46  25  +21   2 1
66 %
6
CLE
 Snow-Pavlovic-James-Gooden-Ilgauskas 12  41  21  +20   4 1
80 %
7
CLE
 Snow-Pavlovic-James-Varejao-Traylor 20  48  30  +18   6 1
85 %
1
DAL
 Terry-Finley-Howard-Nowitzki-Dampier 293  661  575  +86   17 6
73 %
2
DAL
 Terry-Stackhouse-Howard-Nowitzki-Dampier 111  254  194  +60   11 8
57 %
3
DAL
 Terry-Finley-Howard-Henderson-Nowitzki 113  251  219  +32   9 6
60 %
4
DAL
 Terry-Stackhouse-Finley-Nowitzki-Bradley 34  91  67  +24   6 3
66 %
5
DAL
 Terry-Daniels-Stackhouse-Nowitzki-Bradley 28  68  44  +24   8 1
88 %
6
DAL
 Daniels-Stackhouse-Howard-Nowitzki-Bradley 16  37  17  +20   3 1
75 %
7
DAL
 Harris-Finley-Howard-Nowitzki-Dampier 66  134  116  +18   6 4
60 %
1
DEN
 Miller-Buckner-Anthony-Martin-Nene 74  170  129  +41   8 5
61 %
2
DEN
 Boykins-Miller-Russell-Martin-Camby 38  71  48  +23   7 3
70 %
3
DEN
 Boykins-Miller-Johnson-Martin-Nene 24  +20   2 0
100 %
4
DEN
 Boykins-Miller-Russell-Anthony-Camby 18  51  32  +19   5 1
83 %
5
DEN
 Miller-Johnson-Anthony-Camby-Elson 50  112  94  +18   4 1
80 %
6
DEN
 Boykins-Miller-Johnson-Martin-Elson 12  33  16  +17   2 0
100 %
7
DEN
 Miller-Russell-Anthony-Martin-Nene 17  33  18  +15   4 0
100 %
1
DET
 Billups-Hamilton-Prince-R.Wallace-B.Wallace 1171  2288  2077  +211   32 21
60 %
2
DET
 Billups-Hamilton-Prince-McDyess-R.Wallace 208  402  364  +38   18 16
52 %
3
DET
 Billups-Hamilton-Prince-McDyess-B.Wallace 150  331  300  +31   20 17
54 %
4
DET
 Arroyo-Hamilton-Prince-McDyess-R.Wallace 54  117  91  +26   9 7
56 %
5
DET
 Arroyo-Billups-Prince-R.Wallace-B.Wallace 18  46  22  +24   5 2
71 %
6
DET
 Hunter-Hamilton-Dupree-McDyess-B.Wallace 39  91  70  +21   10 4
71 %
7
DET
 Hunter-Hamilton-Prince-McDyess-B.Wallace 51  117  97  +20   10 8
55 %
1
GSW
 B.Davis-Fisher-Richardson-Dunleavy-Foyle 29  72  44  +28   4 1
80 %
2
GSW
 Fisher-Pietrus-Cheaney-Najera-Foyle 19  55  27  +28   5 1
83 %
3
GSW
 Claxton-Fisher-Richardson-Dunleavy-Foyle 103  233  212  +21   5 2
71 %
4
GSW
 Fisher-Cheaney-Dunleavy-Robinson-Foyle 16  32  15  +17   5 0
100 %
5
GSW
 Claxton-Fisher-Dunleavy-Murphy-Robinson 62  152  139  +13   5 3
62 %
6
GSW
 Claxton-Fisher-Richardson-Dunleavy-Murphy 34  21  +13   3 1
75 %
7
GSW
 Fisher-Richardson-Dunleavy-Najera-Foyle 44  94  82  +12   3 1
75 %
1
HOU
 Sura-Wesley-McGrady-Howard-Ming 423  878  844  +34   13 12
52 %
2
HOU
 Wesley-Barry-McGrady-Padgett-Ming 28  81  49  +32   3 2
60 %
3
HOU
 Ward-McGrady-Jackson-Taylor-Ming 167  322  293  +29   6 5
54 %
4
HOU
 Sura-Barry-McGrady-Taylor-Ming 20  53  24  +29   7 0
100 %
5
HOU
 Sura-Wesley-McGrady-Howard-Mutombo 128  272  246  +26   12 8
60 %
6
HOU
 James-Wesley-McGrady-Howard-Ming 91  194  168  +26   4 1
80 %
7
HOU
 Sura-Barry-McGrady-Padgett-Ming 26  70  44  +26   6 2
75 %
1
IND
 Tinsley-Jackson-Artest-Croshere-O'Neal 106  244  198  +46   4 1
80 %
2
IND
 Johnson-Miller-Jackson-Foster-Davis 97  207  169  +38   3 3
50 %
3
IND
 Tinsley-F.Jones-Miller-O'Neal-Foster 104  226  195  +31   11 4
73 %
4
IND
 Tinsley-Miller-Jackson-O'Neal-Foster 67  134  108  +26   4 2
66 %
5
IND
 Tinsley-Miller-J.Jones-O'Neal-Foster 90  179  154  +25   4 3
57 %
6
IND
 Johnson-Miller-Jackson-O'Neal-Foster 129  262  238  +24   7 5
58 %
7
IND
 Tinsley-F.Jones-Miller-Croshere-Harrison 20  49  31  +18   3 0
100 %
1
LAC
 Brunson-Jaric-Simmons-Brand-Rebraca 30  82  44  +38   5 1
83 %
2
LAC
 Brunson-Maggette-Simmons-Brand-Kaman 448  920  888  +32   14 16
46 %
3
LAC
 Livingston-Jaric-Simmons-Moore-Brand 18  42  19  +23   2 1
66 %
4
LAC
 Brunson-Jaric-Simmons-Moore-Brand 19  43  23  +20   4 0
100 %
5
LAC
 Livingston-Maggette-Simmons-Moore-Brand 16  45  27  +18   5 0
100 %
6
LAC
 Brunson-Jaric-Simmons-Moore-Rebraca 17  49  33  +16   4 1
80 %
7
LAC
 Jaric-Maggette-Simmons-Brand-Wilcox 250  498  485  +13   8 8
50 %
1
LAL
 Atkins-Bryant-Jones-Odom-Cook 56  129  93  +36   10 3
76 %
2
LAL
 Atkins-Bryant-Jones-Odom-Mihm 94  208  183  +25   12 6
66 %
3
LAL
 Atkins-Butler-Jones-Cook-Mihm 10  32  11  +21   2 0
100 %
4
LAL
 Brown-Bryant-Jones-Odom-Mihm 15  35  15  +20   6 1
85 %
5
LAL
 Brown-Bryant-Jones-Odom-Grant 28  65  48  +17   4 5
44 %
6
LAL
 Atkins-Butler-Odom-Walton-Cook 18  54  37  +17   4 1
80 %
7
LAL
 Atkins-Bryant-Butler-Odom-Cook 102  241  225  +16   10 6
62 %
1
MEM
 Williams-Battier-Miller-Gasol-Wright 97  209  159  +50   7 2
77 %
2
MEM
 Watson-Battier-Miller-Gasol-Wright 89  192  155  +37   7 2
77 %
3
MEM
 Watson-Battier-Miller-Cardinal-Wright 66  145  108  +37   9 4
69 %
4
MEM
 Watson-Wells-Battier-Cardinal-Gasol 28  72  43  +29   3 0
100 %
5
MEM
 Williams-Wells-Battier-Posey-Gasol 26  69  40  +29   4 1
80 %
6
MEM
 Williams-Battier-Miller-Cardinal-Wright 190  385  359  +26   8 7
53 %
7
MEM
 Watson-Posey-Miller-Swift-Gasol 58  126  102  +24   5 6
45 %
1
MIA
 D.Jones-Wade-E.Jones-Haslem-O'Neal 749  1672  1549  +123   31 17
64 %
2
MIA
 D.Jones-Wade-E.Jones-Laettner-O'Neal 135  311  260  +51   15 13
53 %
3
MIA
 D.Jones-E.Jones-Anderson-Haslem-O'Neal 80  196  148  +48   6 5
54 %
4
MIA
 D.Jones-Wade-Butler-Haslem-Doleac 35  93  58  +35   9 2
81 %
5
MIA
 D.Jones-Wade-Anderson-Haslem-O'Neal 70  156  125  +31   6 7
46 %
6
MIA
 D.Jones-Wade-E.Jones-Haslem-Laettner 38  92  63  +29   5 2
71 %
7
MIA
 Dooling-E.Jones-Anderson-Laettner-O'Neal 31  78  50  +28   6 2
75 %
1
MIL
 James-Mason-Kukoc-Smith-Pachulia 18  56  25  +31   4 0
100 %
2
MIL
 James-Mason-Van Horn-Kukoc-Pachulia 48  102  78  +24   9 1
90 %
3
MIL
 Strickland-Redd-Mason-Kukoc-Smith 29  13  +16   3 0
100 %
4
MIL
 Williams-Redd-Mason-Smith-Booth 19  39  24  +15   3 1
75 %
5
MIL
 Williams-Redd-Mason-Kukoc-Smith 35  100  87  +13   5 3
62 %
6
MIL
 Williams-Mason-Kukoc-Smith-Pachulia 21  53  40  +13   4 1
80 %
7
MIL
 James-Strickland-Redd-Kukoc-Fizer 18  37  25  +12   1 1
50 %
1
MIN
 Cassell-Sprewell-Szczerbiak-Griffin-Garnett 97  211  163  +48   11 6
64 %
2
MIN
 Hudson-Hoiberg-Szczerbiak-Griffin-Garnett 75  194  154  +40   14 7
66 %
3
MIN
 Hudson-Hassell-Sprewell-Griffin-Garnett 59  127  98  +29   9 7
56 %
4
MIN
 Cassell-Hoiberg-Szczerbiak-Griffin-Garnett 25  72  43  +29   8 2
80 %
5
MIN
 Carter-Hassell-Sprewell-Garnett-Thomas 36  76  48  +28   4 1
80 %
6
MIN
 Hudson-Hassell-Sprewell-Szczerbiak-Garnett 66  140  121  +19   11 6
64 %
7
MIN
 Cassell-Hoiberg-Sprewell-Szczerbiak-Garnett 14  41  23  +18   7 1
87 %
1
NJN
 Kidd-Vaughn-Carter-Krstic-Collins 305  587  526  +61   12 9
57 %
2
NJN
 Kidd-Best-Carter-Krstic-Collins 63  144  115  +29   11 6
64 %
3
NJN
 Best-E.Williams-Jefferson-Scalabrine-Collins 54  113  87  +26   8 4
66 %
4
NJN
 Best-E.Williams-Jefferson-Mourning-Collins 122  233  212  +21   5 5
50 %
5
NJN
 Kidd-Vaughn-Carter-Smith-Collins 42  97  79  +18   5 1
83 %
6
NJN
 Kidd-Carter-Buford-Scalabrine-Krstic 30  75  59  +16   2 1
66 %
7
NJN
 Kidd-Carter-Buford-Smith-Collins 28  68  52  +16   5 1
83 %
1
NOH
 Dickau-Davis-Nachbar-Brown-Andersen 33  80  56  +24   4 2
66 %
2
NOH
 Dickau-Jacobsen-Lynch-Brown-Andersen 14  36  19  +17   3 1
75 %
3
NOH
 Dickau-Jacobsen-Nailon-Brown-Andersen 34  76  61  +15   3 3
50 %
4
NOH
 Davis-Smith-Nailon-Brown-Andersen 27  14  +13   2 0
100 %
5
NOH
 Dickau-Nailon-Nachbar-Freije-Andersen 20  +13   2 0
100 %
6
NOH
 Armstrong-Wesley-Nailon-Brown-Magloire 60  109  97  +12   4 2
66 %
7
NOH
 Dickau-Harrington-Lynch-Brown-Andersen 13  29  17  +12   2 1
66 %
1
NYK
 Marbury-Crawford-Hardaway-K.Thomas-Mohammed 82  169  139  +30   8 1
88 %
2
NYK
 Marbury-Hardaway-Ariza-Williams-Sweetney 37  98  72  +26   8 3
72 %
3
NYK
 Marbury-Houston-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Sweetney 16  46  22  +24   3 0
100 %
4
NYK
 Marbury-Crawford-Williams-K.Thomas-Sweetney 37  97  75  +22   6 3
66 %
5
NYK
 Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-Williams-K.Thomas 36  84  63  +21   8 2
80 %
6
NYK
 Marbury-Houston-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Mohammed 149  305  287  +18   6 7
46 %
7
NYK
 Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Taylor 29  12  +17   1 0
100 %
1
ORL
 Nelson-Francis-Hill-Howard-Cato 167  383  312  +71   7 6
53 %
2
ORL
 Francis-Hill-Turkoglu-Howard-Battie 125  261  218  +43   19 9
67 %
3
ORL
 Francis-Hill-Turkoglu-Bradley-Garrity 33  +25   1 0
100 %
4
ORL
 Nelson-Hill-Turkoglu-Howard-Battie 39  111  92  +19   12 3
80 %
5
ORL
 Francis-Mobley-Turkoglu-Garrity-Battie 12  38  19  +19   5 2
71 %
6
ORL
 Nelson-Francis-Turkoglu-Garrity-Battie 27  65  48  +17   5 2
71 %
7
ORL
 Francis-Mobley-Hill-Turkoglu-Battie 16  35  21  +14   3 1
75 %
1
PHI
 Iverson-Iguodala-Korver-Webber-Dalembert 170  392  356  +36   8 3
72 %
2
PHI
 Iverson-Salmons-Korver-Williamson-Jackson 57  135  103  +32   8 4
66 %
3
PHI
 Iverson-Iguodala-Korver-Thomas-Dalembert 200  425  400  +25   9 7
56 %
4
PHI
 Iverson-Green-Iguodala-Williamson-Dalembert 45  109  86  +23   3 3
50 %
5
PHI
 Iverson-Iguodala-Korver-Williamson-Dalembert 73  168  146  +22   9 3
75 %
6
PHI
 Iverson-Iguodala-Korver-Thomas-Williamson 44  105  83  +22   6 3
66 %
7
PHI
 Iverson-Iguodala-McKie-Williamson-Jackson 18  50  29  +21   5 2
71 %
1
PHO
 Nash-Richardson-Johnson-Marion-Stoudemire 1110  2750  2388  +362   41 14
74 %
2
PHO
 Richardson-Johnson-Marion-Stoudemire-Voskuhl 38  80  52  +28   5 0
100 %
3
PHO
 Johnson-Jacobsen-Marion-Stoudemire-Hunter 33  99  72  +27   5 2
71 %
4
PHO
 Nash-Richardson-Jacobsen-Marion-Stoudemire 44  118  93  +25   11 4
73 %
5
PHO
 Nash-Richardson-Jacobsen-Marion-Hunter 47  105  82  +23   8 4
66 %
6
PHO
 Nash-Richardson-Jackson-Marion-Stoudemire 35  96  73  +23   5 3
62 %
7
PHO
 Barbosa-Richardson-Johnson-Marion-Stoudemire 116  286  266  +20   10 6
62 %
1
POR
 Stoudamire-Van Exel-Patterson-Ratliff-Przybilla 231  452  414  +38   10 6
62 %
2
POR
 Stoudamire-Van Exel-Patterson-Randolph-Ratliff 101  192  173  +19   11 4
73 %
3
POR
 Van Exel-Patterson-Miles-Randolph-Przybilla 25  51  34  +17   7 2
77 %
4
POR
 Telfair-Outlaw-Miles-Abdur-Rahim-Ratliff 18  43  27  +16   4 0
100 %
5
POR
 Van Exel-Anderson-Miles-Abdur-Rahim-Randolph 34  76  61  +15   5 0
100 %
6
POR
 Stoudamire-Van Exel-Abdur-Rahim-Randolph-Przybilla 23  +14   1 1
50 %
7
POR
 Telfair-Stoudamire-Patterson-Miles-Abdur-Rahim 24  10  +14   1 0
100 %
1
SAC
 Bibby-Christie-Stojakovic-Webber-Miller 612  1326  1234  +92   16 11
59 %
2
SAC
 Bibby-Mobley-Barnes-Songaila-Miller 52  116  87  +29   4 1
80 %
3
SAC
 Bibby-Evans-Barnes-Songaila-Miller 71  166  140  +26   4 0
100 %
4
SAC
 Bibby-Evans-Stojakovic-Songaila-Ostertag 26  56  38  +18   4 2
66 %
5
SAC
 Bibby-Jackson-Barnes-Songaila-Ostertag 20  48  32  +16   5 3
62 %
6
SAC
 Bibby-Evans-Stojakovic-Songaila-Webber 32  84  69  +15   6 3
66 %
7
SAC
 Bibby-Evans-Martin-Songaila-Miller 19  51  37  +14   4 1
80 %
1
SAS
 Parker-Ginobili-Bowen-Duncan-Nesterovic 576  1168  949  +219   35 13
72 %
2
SAS
 Parker-Ginobili-Bowen-Horry-Duncan 146  331  251  +80   22 11
66 %
3
SAS
 Parker-Ginobili-Bowen-Rose-Duncan 62  146  91  +55   12 5
70 %
4
SAS
 Udrih-Brown-Ginobili-Duncan-Nesterovic 33  94  50  +44   10 3
76 %
5
SAS
 Udrih-Barry-Brown-Ginobili-Duncan 19  66  31  +35   3 0
100 %
6
SAS
 Parker-Barry-Bowen-Duncan-Nesterovic 112  218  187  +31   14 10
58 %
7
SAS
 Parker-Ginobili-Bowen-Massenburg-Duncan 75  164  140  +24   7 7
50 %
1
SEA
 Daniels-Allen-Radmanovic-Collison-Fortson 147  319  263  +56   20 16
55 %
2
SEA
 Ridnour-Allen-Lewis-Radmanovic-Evans 177  396  347  +49   26 15
63 %
3
SEA
 Daniels-Allen-Lewis-Radmanovic-Fortson 160  375  329  +46   21 12
63 %
4
SEA
 Daniels-Allen-Lewis-Radmanovic-Collison 86  247  201  +46   17 9
65 %
5
SEA
 Daniels-Allen-Lewis-Radmanovic-Evans 121  275  247  +28   18 13
58 %
6
SEA
 Ridnour-Daniels-Allen-Lewis-Collison 30  76  48  +28   7 3
70 %
7
SEA
 Ridnour-Allen-Lewis-Radmanovic-James 46  113  91  +22   9 5
64 %
1
TOR
 Alston-Peterson-Rose-Marshall-Bosh 236  548  499  +49   19 16
54 %
2
TOR
 Alston-Rose-Murray-Marshall-Bosh 39  96  64  +32   9 1
90 %
3
TOR
 Palacio-Murray-Marshall-Bonner-Bosh 40  92  66  +26   4 0
100 %
4
TOR
 Alston-Palacio-Rose-Marshall-Bonner 19  57  33  +24   5 0
100 %
5
TOR
 Palacio-Peterson-Murray-Marshall-Bosh 37  81  61  +20   7 1
87 %
6
TOR
 Palacio-Peterson-Murray-Bonner-Araujo 21  60  40  +20   4 0
100 %
7
TOR
 Alston-Palacio-Peterson-Murray-Bosh 13  36  16  +20   1 1
50 %
1
UTA
 Eisley-Bell-Harpring-Kirilenko-Okur 100  193  165  +28   11 11
50 %
2
UTA
 Lopez-Bell-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur 36  86  62  +24   2 1
66 %
3
UTA
 McLeod-Giricek-Kirilenko-Boozer-Collins 61  133  117  +16   3 3
50 %
4
UTA
 Eisley-Bell-Kirilenko-Boozer-Collins 10  30  15  +15   4 0
100 %
5
UTA
 McLeod-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Collins 25  12  +13   2 0
100 %
6
UTA
 Lopez-Bell-Harpring-Boozer-Borchardt 21  +13   2 1
66 %
7
UTA
 Lopez-Giricek-Harpring-Kirilenko-Boozer 15  +12   1 0
100 %
1
WAS
 Arenas-Hughes-Jeffries-Jamison-Haywood 531  1138  1061  +77   17 13
56 %
2
WAS
 Dixon-Arenas-Jamison-Ruffin-Thomas 42  121  59  +62   10 0
100 %
3
WAS
 Arenas-Hayes-Jeffries-Jamison-Haywood 260  552  493  +59   11 5
68 %
4
WAS
 Arenas-Hughes-Hayes-Jamison-Haywood 172  411  352  +59   12 10
54 %
5
WAS
 Arenas-Hughes-Jeffries-Brown-Haywood 53  117  88  +29   3 0
100 %
6
WAS
 Arenas-Hughes-Hayes-Jamison-Ruffin 140  327  302  +25   11 7
61 %
7
WAS
 Arenas-Hughes-Profit-Jeffries-Haywood 35  79  60  +19   3 0
100 %

    Legend:
  • Min = the percentage of the team's total minutes the unit was on the floor.

  • +/- = the team net points for the unit.

  • W = number of games a unit outscored its opponents while on the court.

  • L = number of games a unit was outscored by its opponents while on the court.

  • Win% = the winning percentage for the unit based on Wins versus Losses.


Rate this Feature
Poor   Fair   Good   Excellent

Enter your comments in the box

Email (optional)

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts

Copyright 2003 by 82games.com, All Rights Reserved