Jock Landale of the Phoenix Suns, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Jock Landale
Phoenix Suns
2022-2023 NBA Season

More Jock Landale stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
24%	+139	1.17	1.11	7	36	27	57.1

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.6 4.9 .528 .559 80% 0% 1.1 6.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 45% .467   70% 0% 2.0

Close 42% .559   78% 0% 2.3

Dunk 13% .884   100% 0% 1.1

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 55% .634   85% 0% 3.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 48% .568   67% 0% 2.7

11-15 27% .560   96% 0% 1.5

16-20 20% .560   92% 0% 1.1

21+ 5% .471   75% 0% .2

Crunch 25% .542   89% 0% 1.3

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
79	105	75.2	5.3	4.0	385	48	12.5%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
35	19	14		68	9	7.6	3.2	3.4

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
119	1027	11.6%	33.2%	161	965	16.7%	75.5%	28.3	108.7

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
	0		%	%	%	0	.0	.0%	73	.00	.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
23	9	25	2	8.7

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	S.Lee-Lee-Wainright-Saric-Landale	29	1.24	1.04	14	3	2	60
2	Payne-Shamet-Lee-Craig-Landale	24	1.14	.90	14	4	1	80
3	WashingtonJr.-Okogie-Lee-Wainright-Landale	22	1.18	1.37	-7	2	5	28
4	Payne-Booker-Craig-Bridges-Landale	20	1.15	1.25	-8	3	4	42
5	Payne-Lee-Booker-Craig-Landale	18	1.06	1.12	0	3	1	75
6	Payne-Booker-Ross-Wainright-Landale	18	1.43	1.12	17	4	1	80
7	Paul-Craig-Bridges-Landale-Ayton	17	.67	1.17	-17	0	2	0
8	Payne-Shamet-Booker-Warren-Landale	16	1.20	.97	11	3	0	100
9	Paul-Booker-Bridges-C.Johnson-Landale	16	1.53	.83	22	3	1	75
10	S.Lee-Okogie-Lee-Wainright-Landale	15	.91	1.24	-16	0	4	0
11	Payne-Lee-Ross-Wainright-Landale	14	1.21	1.15	3	2	2	50
12	Shamet-Okogie-Lee-Wainright-Landale	14	1.33	.65	20	3	1	75
13	Shamet-Lee-Booker-Saric-Landale	14	1.26	1.31	0	1	1	50
14	Paul-Okogie-Booker-Bridges-Landale	13	1.15	1.32	-3	1	1	50
15	Shamet-Okogie-Lee-Saric-Landale	13	1.14	.89	7	1	2	33
16	S.Lee-Shamet-Okogie-Wainright-Landale	13	1.14	1.03	2	1	0	100
17	Okogie-Lee-Bridges-Wainright-Landale	13	1.17	1.13	0	2	1	66
18	S.Lee-WashingtonJr.-Okogie-Wainright-Landale	13	1.20	1.04	7	3	0	100
19	Paul-Lee-Craig-Landale-Ayton	11	.88	1.40	-14	0	1	0
20	Paul-Lee-Craig-Bridges-Landale	11	1.40	1.05	7	2	2	50

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 S.Lee-Lee-Wainright-Saric-Landale .510 .432 +4 43% 36%   61% -3%

2 Payne-Shamet-Lee-Craig-Landale .370 .425 +5 26% 38%   55% +13%

3 WashingtonJr.-Okogie-Lee-Wainright-Landale .452 .535 +6 33% 37%   65% -13%

4 Payne-Booker-Craig-Bridges-Landale .486 .541 -8 35% 49%   53% -8%

5 Payne-Lee-Booker-Craig-Landale .361 .484 +1 17% 39%   52% +7%

6 Payne-Booker-Ross-Wainright-Landale .526 .484 +1 16% 45%   55% +8%

7 Paul-Craig-Bridges-Landale-Ayton .324 .455 -8 24% 52%   47% -8%

8 Payne-Shamet-Booker-Warren-Landale .533 .542 +3 37% 25%   54% +5%

9 Paul-Booker-Bridges-C.Johnson-Landale .704 .290 +1 41% 45%   51% +5%

10 S.Lee-Okogie-Lee-Wainright-Landale .407 .556 -5 48% 37%   56% -6%

11 Payne-Lee-Ross-Wainright-Landale .433 .440 -7 33% 36%   52% +1%

12 Shamet-Okogie-Lee-Wainright-Landale .538 .292 +4 23% 17%   49% +19%

13 Shamet-Lee-Booker-Saric-Landale .414 .591 -3 38% 41%   62% 0%

14 Paul-Okogie-Booker-Bridges-Landale .406 .520 0 16% 48%   57% +1%

15 Shamet-Okogie-Lee-Saric-Landale .458 .381 +2 33% 29%   56% +4%

16 S.Lee-Shamet-Okogie-Wainright-Landale .400 .542 0 37% 21%   61% +10%

17 Okogie-Lee-Bridges-Wainright-Landale .500 .545 -7 21% 55%   60% +3%

18 S.Lee-WashingtonJr.-Okogie-Wainright-Landale .424 .429 -2 39% 46%   53% +1%

19 Paul-Lee-Craig-Landale-Ayton .417 .500 -6 17% 27%   32% +4%

20 Paul-Lee-Craig-Bridges-Landale .474 .471 0 26% 59%   65% -5%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	1%	-16	101.0	113.2	-12.2	2	5	28%
C	23%	+153	117.9	109.7	8.2	37	26	58%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	9.8	.417	3.3	25%	8.1	2.4	2.4	.0	5.7	10.6	7.4
C	17.3	.565	5.4	56%	14.4	3.5	3.0	.0	6.3	23.6	20.2

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 17.9 .386 4.9 50% 10.6 .8 2.4 .0 3.3 18.7 11.3

C 14.2 .590 6.1 56% 11.5 3.5 3.0 .0 5.9 21.2 17.4

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF -8.1 .030 -1.6 -25% -2.4 1.6 .0 .0 -2.4 -8.1 -3.9

C 3.1 -.026 -.7 0% 2.9 -.1 .0 .0 -.5 2.4 2.8

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
5%	+3	136.0	118.3	17.7	2	0	100.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 5.9 11.8 .500 .500 100% 0% 0.0 11.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 100% .500   100% 0% 0.5

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 100% .500   100% 0% 0.5

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 50% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 50% 1.000   100% 0% 0.5

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 100% .500   50% 0% 0.5

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	5.9	0.0	2	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	1	0.0	%-11.8	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
1	4	25.0%	75.0%	0	7	0.0%	85.7%	25.0	160.7

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-16.7

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	959	2924	24%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	116.6	116.4	+0.2
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	110.6	116.1	-5.5
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+6.0	+0.3	+5.7
Points Scored	2336	6983	-4647
Points Allowed	2197	6952	-4755
Net Points	+139	+31	+108
Effective FG%	53.1%	53.6%	-0.5%
Effective FG% Allowed	52.0%	53.6%	-1.6%
Assisted Field Goals	65%	64%	+1%
Assisted FG% Allowed	56%	58%	-2%
Own Shots Blocked	0%	0%	+0%
Shots Blocked	0%	0%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	33.2%	28.5%	+4.7%
Defensive Rebounding	75.5%	71.4%	+4.1%
Total Rebounding	54.4%	50.0%	+4.4%
Stats
Free Throws Made	18	17	+1
Free Throws Attempted	22	21	+1
Free Throws Made by Opp.	21	19	-2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	27	25	-2
Turnovers, on Offense	15	13	-2
Turnovers, on Defense	15	14	+1
Net Turnovers	0	1	+1
Fouls Committed	23	20	-3
Fouls, Drawn	21	19	+2
Net Fouls	-2	-1	+1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts