Jakob Poeltl of the San Antonio Spurs, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Jakob Poeltl
San Antonio Spurs
2021-2022 NBA Season

More Jakob Poeltl stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
49%	+117	1.17	1.15	2.9	36	30	54.5

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 6.0 9.8 .618 .619 70% 6% 1.4 13.5

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 34% .496   71% 0% 3.3

Close 60% .651   67% 9% 7.6

Dunk 7% .956   91% 2% 1.3

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 66% .682   70% 9% 8.8

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 46% .650   56% 6% 5.8

11-15 29% .615   93% 5% 3.5

16-20 17% .557   73% 8% 1.9

21+ 8% .596   65% 4% .9

Crunch 25% .569   71% 7% 2.8

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
94	190	49.5	4.7	2.3	747	84	11.2%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
68	49	64	8	189	38	5.0	5.0	4.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
262	2082	12.6%	28.3%	372	2008	18.5%	71.8%	31.1	100.1

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
12	98	8	1%	8%	4%	118	2.9	3.2%	144	.82	9.6

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
26	38	42	3	12.7

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Murray-White-Johnson-McDermott-Poeltl	301	1.15	1.11	29	14	10	58
2	Murray-Vassell-Johnson-McDermott-Poeltl	150	1.17	1.17	0	6	11	35
3	Murray-White-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl	86	1.14	1.14	0	5	11	31
4	Murray-Primo-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl	82	1.08	1.16	-13	5	4	55
5	Murray-White-WalkerIV-Johnson-Poeltl	77	1.17	1.18	-1	8	8	50
6	Murray-Richardson-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl	72	1.19	1.11	14	7	2	77
7	Murray-WalkerIV-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl	69	1.20	1.22	-6	8	12	40
8	Jones-Primo-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl	49	1.15	1.22	-6	4	4	50
9	Murray-WalkerIV-Primo-Bates-Diop-Poeltl	48	1.00	1.20	-23	1	4	20
10	Murray-White-Johnson-Bates-Diop-Poeltl	36	1.13	.93	14	3	1	75
11	Jones-White-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl	32	1.26	1.24	-2	2	3	40
12	Murray-WalkerIV-Vassell-Bates-Diop-Poeltl	31	1.39	1.01	22	4	4	50
13	Murray-WalkerIV-Johnson-McDermott-Poeltl	31	1.25	1.31	-1	6	4	60
14	White-Johnson-McDermott-Bates-Diop-Poeltl	27	1.13	1.11	1	2	2	50
15	Murray-White-McDermott-Bates-Diop-Poeltl	26	1.28	1.19	5	2	1	66
16	White-Forbes-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl	24	1.10	.87	17	6	1	85
17	Murray-Forbes-Primo-Bates-Diop-Poeltl	21	1.00	1.04	-4	1	2	33
18	Jones-Richardson-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl	18	1.35	1.13	10	4	2	66
19	Murray-Forbes-WalkerIV-Bates-Diop-Poeltl	16	1.33	.89	15	4	2	66
20	Murray-Forbes-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl	16	1.14	1.45	-14	2	3	40

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Murray-White-Johnson-McDermott-Poeltl .460 .480 -2 33% 38%   50% +5%

2 Murray-Vassell-Johnson-McDermott-Poeltl .490 .500 -5 37% 38%   48% +3%

3 Murray-White-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl .480 .450 -31 30% 38%   52% 0%

4 Murray-Primo-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl .430 .460 -22 31% 33%   49% +2%

5 Murray-White-WalkerIV-Johnson-Poeltl .510 .510 +5 32% 35%   49% 0%

6 Murray-Richardson-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl .490 .440 +10 36% 28%   49% +1%

7 Murray-WalkerIV-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl .520 .470 +9 33% 40%   46% -1%

8 Jones-Primo-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl .550 .480 -10 29% 40%   42% -7%

9 Murray-WalkerIV-Primo-Bates-Diop-Poeltl .410 .550 -1 38% 30%   48% +8%

10 Murray-White-Johnson-Bates-Diop-Poeltl .450 .390 -4 34% 25%   64% +1%

11 Jones-White-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl .580 .490 +9 39% 30%   47% -1%

12 Murray-WalkerIV-Vassell-Bates-Diop-Poeltl .560 .430 -17 26% 47%   50% +11%

13 Murray-WalkerIV-Johnson-McDermott-Poeltl .590 .530 -5 33% 36%   47% -8%

14 White-Johnson-McDermott-Bates-Diop-Poeltl .510 .440 -3 38% 36%   55% -12%

15 Murray-White-McDermott-Bates-Diop-Poeltl .470 .500 0 35% 27%   68% -6%

16 White-Forbes-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl .400 .390 -2 25% 39%   51% +15%

17 Murray-Forbes-Primo-Bates-Diop-Poeltl .470 .440 -13 37% 33%   49% +7%

18 Jones-Richardson-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl .560 .490 +12 37% 26%   46% -3%

19 Murray-Forbes-WalkerIV-Bates-Diop-Poeltl .490 .400 -2 27% 50%   54% +5%

20 Murray-Forbes-Vassell-Johnson-Poeltl .440 .630 -8 32% 50%   66% +2%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C	49%	+116	117.6	114.7	2.9	36	30	54%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF
C	16.4	.619	4.7	66%	15.7	4.7	2.7	2.9	5.3	22.7	25.0

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF

C 17.4 .577 5.5 53% 16.7 4.3 3.8 1.8 5.3 23.7 21.8

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF

C -1.0 .042 -.8 13% -1.0 .4 1.1 1.2 .1 -1.1 3.3

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
77%	-21	91.4	100.5	-9.1	0	0	0.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 6.9 11.7 .593 .593 81% 7% 3.5 17.3

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 48% .462   83% 0% 0.4

Close 48% .692   78% 15% 0.6

Dunk 4% 1.000   100% 0% 0.1

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 52% .714   80% 14% 0.7

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 56% .467   57% 13% 0.5

11-15 30% .875   100% 0% 0.5

16-20 15% .500   100% 0% 0.1

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 19% .400   67% 0% 0.1

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
8	17	47.1	7.4	3.5	32	5	15.6%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
2	0	4	0	6	3	2.0	1.7	2.6

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
16	135	11.9%	35.6%	25	124	20.2%	67.7%	32.0	103.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	8	0	1%	11%	0%	9	3.9	4.6%	8	1.13	13.3

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	3	0	0	18.6

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1937	1953	49%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	117.5	109.7	+7.8
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	115.3	112.3	+3.1
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+2.2	-2.6	+4.8
Points Scored	4745	4534	+211
Points Allowed	4628	4641	-13
Net Points	+117	-107	+224
Effective FG%	54.4%	51.1%	+3.3%
Effective FG% Allowed	53.9%	52.6%	+1.3%
Assisted Field Goals	64%	64%	+0%
Assisted FG% Allowed	55%	57%	-2%
Own Shots Blocked	4%	5%	-1%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	28.3%	25.9%	+2.4%
Defensive Rebounding	71.8%	72.8%	-1.0%
Total Rebounding	50.1%	49.4%	+0.7%
Stats
Free Throws Made	14	17	-3
Free Throws Attempted	19	21	-2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	16	16	+0
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	21	20	-1
Turnovers, on Offense	11	13	+2
Turnovers, on Defense	13	14	-1
Net Turnovers	2	1	-1
Fouls Committed	18	18	+0
Fouls, Drawn	18	19	-1
Net Fouls	0	1	+1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts