Terence Davis of the Sacramento Kings, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Terence Davis
Sacramento Kings
2020-2021 NBA Season

More Terence Davis stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
16%	-64	1.09	1.14	-5.4	14	13	51.9

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 4.0 9.1 .439 .549 62% 7% 1.1 11.1

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 68% .533   74% 2% 6.6

Close 27% .507   38% 21% 2.5

Dunk 5% 1.000   67% 0% .9

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 32% .582   46% 18% 3.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 47% .565   64% 9% 4.9

11-15 26% .453   65% 9% 2.1

16-20 18% .678   48% 0% 2.3

21+ 9% .476   86% 0% .7

Crunch 27% .614   57% 0% 3.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
29	37	78.4	3.1	2.5	264	18	6.8%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
15	10	12	9	46	16	2.9	4.5	3.9

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
11	583	1.9%	20.9%	77	556	13.8%	72.8%	15.7	93.8

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	6		%	2%	%	7	.6	.7%	25	.28	1.9

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
3	16	15		14.1

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Davis-Wright-Hield-Harkless-Holmes	28	1.25	.98	19	4	1	80
2	Haliburton-Davis-Wright-Harkless-Metu	28	1.18	1.39	-12	3	5	37
3	Davis-Wright-Hield-Harkless-Jones	24	1.21	1.38	-8	2	4	33
4	Fox-Davis-Wright-Harkless-Metu	22	1.18	1.31	-4	1	5	16
5	Haliburton-Davis-Wright-Barnes-Metu	19	.93	1.10	-7	3	4	42
6	Haliburton-Davis-Wright-Harkless-Whiteside	16	.94	1.09	-4	1	3	25
7	Ramsey-Davis-James-King-Jones	13	1.06	1.00	2	1	0	100
8	Davis-Wright-Harkless-Metu-Jones	12	1.28	.93	7	2	0	100
9	Fox-Davis-Wright-Harkless-Barnes	11	1.48	1.18	5	2	1	66
10	Davis-Wright-Harkless-Barnes-Metu	10	1.53	.86	11	2	1	66
11	Davis-Wright-Hield-James-Jones	9	.77	1.23	-10	1	3	25
12	Fox-Haliburton-Davis-Hield-Barnes	9	1.35	.90	12	2	0	100
13	Fox-Davis-Wright-Barnes-Metu	9	1.55	1.40	3	3	1	75
14	Davis-Wright-Hield-Metu-Jones	8	.62	1.10	-9	1	2	33
15	Fox-Haliburton-Davis-Barnes-Holmes	8	1.00	1.00	0	2	2	50
16	Haliburton-Davis-Wright-Barnes-Whiteside	8	1.12	1.22	-3	2	2	50
17	Davis-Wright-James-Metu-Jones	8	1.50	1.24	6	1	2	33
18	Fox-Davis-Wright-Harkless-Holmes	7	1.08	1.38	-5	1	2	33
19	Haliburton-Davis-Wright-Harkless-Holmes	7	.82	.89	-2	2	3	40
20	Fox-Davis-Wright-Barnes-Holmes	7	.62	1.27	-11	0	4	0

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Davis-Wright-Hield-Harkless-Holmes .520 .410 -13 41% 43%   47% +5%

2 Haliburton-Davis-Wright-Harkless-Metu .490 .670 -9 30% 46%   49% +5%

3 Davis-Wright-Hield-Harkless-Jones .510 .600 -7 27% 48%   40% +4%

4 Fox-Davis-Wright-Harkless-Metu .460 .540 +3 25% 24%   40% +13%

5 Haliburton-Davis-Wright-Barnes-Metu .400 .490 +9 50% 43%   40% +5%

6 Haliburton-Davis-Wright-Harkless-Whiteside .390 .430 -10 45% 43%   55% -9%

7 Ramsey-Davis-James-King-Jones .410 .440 -5 33% 28%   53% 0%

8 Davis-Wright-Harkless-Metu-Jones .520 .300 -13 44% 30%   53% -1%

9 Fox-Davis-Wright-Harkless-Barnes .530 .530 +11 20% 16%   64% 0%

10 Davis-Wright-Harkless-Barnes-Metu .590 .350 -1 24% 41%   55% +9%

11 Davis-Wright-Hield-James-Jones .440 .590 -5 13% 18%   38% -4%

12 Fox-Haliburton-Davis-Hield-Barnes .520 .360 -9 40% 50%   50% +20%

13 Fox-Davis-Wright-Barnes-Metu .710 .530 +2 35% 32%   39% +10%

14 Davis-Wright-Hield-Metu-Jones .320 .530 -5 21% 47%   52% +1%

15 Fox-Haliburton-Davis-Barnes-Holmes .400 .290 -1 40% 36%   54% -6%

16 Haliburton-Davis-Wright-Barnes-Whiteside .440 .500 -2 44% 21%   52% +6%

17 Davis-Wright-James-Metu-Jones .470 .640 0 26% 50%   60% +6%

18 Fox-Davis-Wright-Harkless-Holmes .500 .540 -2 20% 46%   52% -25%

19 Haliburton-Davis-Wright-Harkless-Holmes .270 .380 +4 13% 25%   54% +5%

20 Fox-Davis-Wright-Barnes-Holmes .220 .430 0 11% 21%   38% -9%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	6%	+57	121.0	107.7	13.3	11	8	57%
SG	8%	-86	106.1	119.4	-13.4	8	16	33%
SF	1%	-36	93.2	124.5	-31.4	6	9	40%
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	22.1	.584	4.2	28%	7.0	5.8	3.7	.9	4.0	29.3	22.5
SG	20.1	.527	3.0	32%	7.7	2.8	2.5	.0	4.1	23.4	15.0
SF	20.0	.522	.0	47%	7.8	2.6	1.7	2.6	5.2	20.9	14.9
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 20.2   .517   2.3   29% 5.1   7.4   4.2   .2   4.2   22.3   15.2

SG 18.6   .568   6.6   32% 8.0   6.0   3.6   1.4   4.1   26.0   22.7

SF 16.5   .579   12.2   31% 6.1   2.6   .9   2.6   2.6   30.5   28.7

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 1.9 .067 1.9 -1% 1.9 -1.6 .5 .7 .2 7.0 7.4

SG 1.6 -.040 -3.6 0% -.3 -3.1 1.1 -1.4 .0 -2.5 -7.7

SF 3.5 -.057 -12.2 16% 1.7 .0 -.9 .0 -2.6 -9.6 -13.8

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
14%	-6	112.7	126.0	-13.3	2	5	28.6%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 13.3 28.7 .462 .615 67% 8% 4.4 39.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 77% .600   75% 0% 1.5

Close 15% .500   0% 50% 0.3

Dunk 8% 1.000   100% 0% 0.3

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 23% .667   50% 33% 0.5

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 38% .800   67% 0% 1.0

11-15 23% .000   0% 33% 0.0

16-20 23% .833   50% 0% 0.6

21+ 15% .750   100% 0% 0.4

Crunch 38% .800   67% 0% 1.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	2	100.0	4.4	4.4	14	1	7.1%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	-4.4	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	27	0.0%	18.5%	5	20	25.0%	75.0%	25.0	93.5

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	1	0	0%	7%	0%	1	2.2	2.9%	1	1.00	11.8

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	0.4

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	566	2832	16%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	108.4	116.0	-7.5
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	114.7	119.4	-4.7
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-6.2	-3.4	-2.8
Points Scored	1301	6888	-5587
Points Allowed	1365	7089	-5724
Net Points	-64	-201	+137
Effective FG%	52.6%	55.4%	-2.8%
Effective FG% Allowed	55.2%	55.8%	-0.6%
Assisted Field Goals	59%	59%	+0%
Assisted FG% Allowed	57%	58%	-1%
Own Shots Blocked	6%	5%	+1%
Shots Blocked	6%	5%	+1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	20.9%	25.0%	-4.0%
Defensive Rebounding	72.8%	72.2%	+0.6%
Total Rebounding	46.9%	48.6%	-1.7%
Stats
Free Throws Made	15	16	-1
Free Throws Attempted	20	22	-2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	19	17	-2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	26	22	-4
Turnovers, on Offense	13	13	+0
Turnovers, on Defense	16	13	+3
Net Turnovers	3	0	-3
Fouls Committed	20	19	-1
Fouls, Drawn	18	19	-1
Net Fouls	-2	0	+2

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts