Dario Saric of the Phoenix Suns, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Dario Saric
Phoenix Suns
2020-2021 NBA Season

More Dario Saric stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
24%	+219	1.21	1.1	12.3	29	21	58.0

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 3.1 6.8 .447 .516 82% 9% 1.7 8.7

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 56% .503   90% 2% 3.9

Close 44% .533   74% 17% 3.2

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 44% .533   74% 17% 3.2

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 38% .527   78% 8% 2.7

11-15 23% .556   86% 6% 1.8

16-20 25% .441   82% 15% 1.5

21+ 14% .553   83% 2% 1.0

Crunch 39% .481   82% 11% 2.5

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
84	99	84.8	5.6	4.7	386	44	11.4%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
26	14	20	5	65	14	4.6	4.0	3.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
46	828	5.6%	22.9%	144	835	17.2%	78.4%	22.8	101.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	3		%	1%	%	4	.2	.3%	59	.07	.7

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
9	14	33	1	10.6

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Paul-Booker-Bridges-Crowder-Saric	64	1.07	.99	25	13	5	72
2	Carter-Payne-Craig-C.Johnson-Saric	41	1.20	1.05	11	4	4	50
3	Payne-Booker-Craig-C.Johnson-Saric	41	1.00	1.23	-23	5	10	33
4	Paul-Carter-Craig-C.Johnson-Saric	36	1.25	1.35	-9	4	6	40
5	Payne-Booker-Bridges-Crowder-Saric	34	1.41	1.08	27	6	4	60
6	Paul-Booker-Bridges-Saric-Ayton	34	1.17	1.11	4	5	2	71
7	Payne-Booker-Bridges-C.Johnson-Saric	32	1.30	.97	27	7	3	70
8	Payne-Moore-Crowder-C.Johnson-Saric	29	1.06	1.18	-7	2	3	40
9	Payne-Galloway-Craig-C.Johnson-Saric	29	1.24	1.13	11	2	2	50
10	Payne-Booker-Crowder-C.Johnson-Saric	28	1.13	1.24	-10	4	8	33
11	Paul-Moore-Crowder-C.Johnson-Saric	20	1.17	.90	16	4	1	80
12	Carter-Payne-Galloway-C.Johnson-Saric	16	1.26	.81	13	3	1	75
13	Carter-Payne-Booker-C.Johnson-Saric	14	1.23	.93	10	4	1	80
14	Paul-Carter-C.Johnson-Saric-Kaminsky	14	1.32	1.12	8	1	1	50
15	Paul-Carter-Craig-Bridges-Saric	13	1.39	1.30	-3	1	2	33
16	Carter-Payne-Craig-Smith-Saric	13	1.39	.84	17	1	0	100
17	Paul-Craig-Bridges-C.Johnson-Saric	11	.95	.94	2	2	2	50
18	Payne-Booker-C.Johnson-Saric-Kaminsky	9	1.43	1.05	10	2	0	100
19	Paul-Nader-Crowder-C.Johnson-Saric	9	1.76	1.31	9	2	0	100
20	Paul-Galloway-Bridges-C.Johnson-Saric	8	1.06	.83	4	1	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Paul-Booker-Bridges-Crowder-Saric .470 .450 +14 25% 31%   48% +2%

2 Carter-Payne-Craig-C.Johnson-Saric .510 .470 -14 23% 33%   52% -2%

3 Payne-Booker-Craig-C.Johnson-Saric .360 .570 -11 27% 31%   46% +6%

4 Paul-Carter-Craig-C.Johnson-Saric .460 .510 0 21% 23%   51% +1%

5 Payne-Booker-Bridges-Crowder-Saric .620 .440 -3 33% 35%   48% -7%

6 Paul-Booker-Bridges-Saric-Ayton .480 .470 +10 25% 35%   50% -4%

7 Payne-Booker-Bridges-C.Johnson-Saric .550 .440 +8 39% 31%   49% +2%

8 Payne-Moore-Crowder-C.Johnson-Saric .390 .490 -8 28% 34%   56% -1%

9 Payne-Galloway-Craig-C.Johnson-Saric .460 .430 -5 29% 33%   53% +3%

10 Payne-Booker-Crowder-C.Johnson-Saric .400 .490 +5 34% 32%   52% +3%

11 Paul-Moore-Crowder-C.Johnson-Saric .490 .420 0 23% 32%   44% +11%

12 Carter-Payne-Galloway-C.Johnson-Saric .520 .350 -5 19% 41%   55% +4%

13 Carter-Payne-Booker-C.Johnson-Saric .550 .480 +7 23% 35%   52% +4%

14 Paul-Carter-C.Johnson-Saric-Kaminsky .570 .480 +4 39% 48%   47% +4%

15 Paul-Carter-Craig-Bridges-Saric .570 .550 -4 10% 27%   58% -3%

16 Carter-Payne-Craig-Smith-Saric .580 .390 -2 35% 27%   59% +6%

17 Paul-Craig-Bridges-C.Johnson-Saric .370 .350 +2 16% 40%   38% +7%

18 Payne-Booker-C.Johnson-Saric-Kaminsky .720 .470 -4 28% 35%   55% -9%

19 Paul-Nader-Crowder-C.Johnson-Saric .770 .540 -2 31% 46%   48% -5%

20 Paul-Galloway-Bridges-C.Johnson-Saric .390 .440 +4 22% 38%   59% +11%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	4%	+55	125.7	108.8	17.0	15	5	75%
C	20%	+163	118.5	107.3	11.2	25	22	53%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	15.4	.686	2.4	33%	12.1	4.5	3.6	.6	6.4	23.0	20.3
C	20.1	.486	6.3	45%	10.4	3.5	3.1	.1	5.1	24.9	17.3

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 15.4 .451 3.3 27% 8.8 2.7 2.4 .9 4.2 16.7 10.9

C 15.1 .527 6.3 51% 13.6 3.0 2.6 1.9 4.4 20.8 21.1

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF .0 .235 -.9 6% 3.3 1.8 -1.2 -.3 -2.1 6.4 9.4

C 5.0 -.041 -.1 -6% -3.2 .5 -.5 -1.8 -.7 4.1 -3.8

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
6%	0	135.1	135.1	0.0	7	2	77.8%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 4.4 4.4 1.000 .000 0% 0% 8.7 8.7

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 100% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 100% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	6	33.3	26.1	8.7	2	1	50.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	-8.7	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	15	0.0%	26.7%	0	9	0.0%	77.8%	0.0	104.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-12.1

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	854	2575	24%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	120.7	117.5	+3.1
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	109.5	113.7	-4.2
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+11.2	+3.8	+7.3
Points Scored	2133	6167	-4034
Points Allowed	1914	5967	-4053
Net Points	+219	+200	+19
Effective FG%	57.3%	56.2%	+1.2%
Effective FG% Allowed	52.9%	53.5%	-0.6%
Assisted Field Goals	63%	61%	+2%
Assisted FG% Allowed	53%	57%	-4%
Own Shots Blocked	4%	3%	+1%
Shots Blocked	4%	5%	-1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	22.9%	23.9%	-0.9%
Defensive Rebounding	78.4%	74.1%	+4.3%
Total Rebounding	50.7%	49.0%	+1.7%
Stats
Free Throws Made	17	15	+2
Free Throws Attempted	20	18	+2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	18	16	-2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	23	21	-2
Turnovers, on Offense	12	12	+0
Turnovers, on Defense	14	13	+1
Net Turnovers	2	1	-1
Fouls Committed	19	18	-1
Fouls, Drawn	18	18	+0
Net Fouls	-1	0	+1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts