Chasson Randle of the Orlando Magic, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Chasson Randle
Orlando Magic
2020-2021 NBA Season

More Chasson Randle stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
24%	-265	1.02	1.16	-15.5	9	29	23.7

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.2 5.8 .388 .481 47% 5% .9 6.5

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 76% .436   60% 1% 3.9

Close 24% .625   26% 20% 1.7

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 24% .625   26% 20% 1.7

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 43% .480   43% 4% 2.4

11-15 27% .548   44% 8% 1.7

16-20 21% .429   59% 2% 1.0

21+ 10% .417   50% 13% .5

Crunch 31% .425   56% 5% 1.5

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
38	48	79.2	2.8	2.2	259	22	8.5%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
27	21	19	7	74	25	3.0	3.7	4.3

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
7	924	.8%	22.0%	75	871	8.6%	75.5%	9.4	97.5

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	4		%	1%	%	5	.3	.3%	38	.13	.8

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
3	25	18		11.8

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Randle-Hampton-Thornwell-Brazdeikis-Hall	47	.96	.95	2	1	1	50
2	Randle-Fournier-Aminu-Gordon-Vucevic	27	1.32	1.17	7	1	1	50
3	Randle-Bacon-Okeke-Birch-Vucevic	24	.90	1.42	-25	0	4	0
4	Randle-Hampton-Thornwell-Brazdeikis-Wagner	24	.90	1.25	-13	1	2	33
5	Randle-Fournier-Ross-Okeke-Vucevic	21	1.30	1.31	-2	3	3	50
6	Randle-Hampton-Brazdeikis-Wagner-Bamba	21	1.32	1.15	5	1	0	100
7	Randle-Bacon-EnnisIII-Okeke-CarterJr.	21	1.00	1.38	-13	1	1	50
8	Randle-Hampton-Thornwell-Brazdeikis-Bamba	20	1.17	1.19	-2	1	1	50
9	Randle-Bacon-EnnisIII-Okeke-Birch	18	1.20	1.17	1	3	2	60
10	Randle-Hampton-Bacon-Okeke-Bamba	16	.92	1.18	-11	1	2	33
11	Randle-Ross-Bacon-Okeke-Bamba	16	.76	.91	-7	0	3	0
12	Randle-Hampton-Bacon-Hall-Bamba	15	.78	.91	-4	1	1	50
13	Cannady-Randle-Hampton-Franks-Hall	14	1.19	1.13	2	1	1	50
14	Cannady-Randle-Hampton-Franks-Bamba	14	.84	.97	-4	1	1	50
15	Randle-Ross-Bacon-Okeke-Birch	14	.72	1.18	-16	0	2	0
16	Randle-Ross-EnnisIII-Okeke-CarterJr.	13	1.07	.93	7	2	0	100
17	Randle-Ross-Bacon-Aminu-Vucevic	13	.85	1.38	-18	1	2	33
18	Randle-Hampton-Bacon-Wagner-Bamba	13	.81	1.38	-18	0	5	0
19	Randle-Hampton-Bacon-EnnisIII-Bamba	12	1.33	.79	13	2	0	100
20	Randle-Bacon-Clark-Birch-Vucevic	12	1.30	1.26	1	1	1	50

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Randle-Hampton-Thornwell-Brazdeikis-Hall .450 .390 +7 34% 29%   45% -1%

2 Randle-Fournier-Aminu-Gordon-Vucevic .500 .500 +2 26% 25%   57% -2%

3 Randle-Bacon-Okeke-Birch-Vucevic .360 .550 -7 28% 36%   46% -6%

4 Randle-Hampton-Thornwell-Brazdeikis-Wagner .330 .560 +8 42% 47%   43% +7%

5 Randle-Fournier-Ross-Okeke-Vucevic .570 .540 -1 38% 34%   43% -3%

6 Randle-Hampton-Brazdeikis-Wagner-Bamba .530 .450 +9 47% 40%   57% -9%

7 Randle-Bacon-EnnisIII-Okeke-CarterJr. .380 .580 +3 29% 28%   57% +5%

8 Randle-Hampton-Thornwell-Brazdeikis-Bamba .450 .470 +5 30% 26%   49% 0%

9 Randle-Bacon-EnnisIII-Okeke-Birch .420 .470 +4 26% 33%   48% +8%

10 Randle-Hampton-Bacon-Okeke-Bamba .430 .500 -2 17% 25%   47% +2%

11 Randle-Ross-Bacon-Okeke-Bamba .240 .400 0 21% 50%   49% +11%

12 Randle-Hampton-Bacon-Hall-Bamba .300 .330 +2 23% 28%   44% -8%

13 Cannady-Randle-Hampton-Franks-Hall .480 .420 -2 24% 38%   45% +16%

14 Cannady-Randle-Hampton-Franks-Bamba .360 .360 0 25% 32%   46% -4%

15 Randle-Ross-Bacon-Okeke-Birch .310 .400 -8 21% 37%   31% -3%

16 Randle-Ross-EnnisIII-Okeke-CarterJr. .440 .390 +4 37% 30%   51% +12%

17 Randle-Ross-Bacon-Aminu-Vucevic .390 .580 -2 26% 35%   52% -9%

18 Randle-Hampton-Bacon-Wagner-Bamba .360 .500 +1 48% 31%   40% -4%

19 Randle-Hampton-Bacon-EnnisIII-Bamba .550 .300 +3 30% 17%   53% -4%

20 Randle-Bacon-Clark-Birch-Vucevic .420 .570 +3 25% 29%   62% 0%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	22%	-273	99.5	116.5	-17.0	7	28	20%
SG	1%	+8	119.1	110.9	8.2	4	2	66%
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	13.6	.486	2.9	24%	5.0	4.4	2.6	.3	3.8	15.5	9.7
SG	18.5	.417	2.1	11%	2.1	3.1	4.1	.0	3.1	17.5	4.6
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 22.5 .550 3.7 26% 6.3 8.9 2.5 .4 2.9 27.9 22.8

SG 15.4 .233 10.3 26% 9.2 7.2 4.1 1.0 6.2 16.4 8.8

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG -8.9 -.063 -.9 -2% -1.3 -4.5 -.1 -.1 -.9 -12.4 -13.1

SG 3.1 .183 -8.2 -15% -7.2 -4.1 .0 -1.0 3.1 1.0 -4.2

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
19%	-7	80.9	99.2	-18.3	1	3	25.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 2.6 15.7 .167 .167 100% 17% 5.2 10.4

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 83% .200   100% 0% 0.3

Close 17% .000   0% 100% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 17% .000   0% 100% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 33% .500   100% 50% 0.3

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 33% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 33% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 67% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	3	66.7	7.8	5.2	7	1	14.3%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	1	1	0	1.0	5.2	2.6

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	21	0.0%	28.6%	2	19	10.5%	68.4%	10.5	97.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	3	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	11.3

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	819	2578	24%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	102.1	107.7	-5.6
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	115.7	115.4	+0.3
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-13.6	-7.7	-5.9
Points Scored	1718	5770	-4052
Points Allowed	1983	6175	-4192
Net Points	-265	-405	+140
Effective FG%	46.6%	49.7%	-3.1%
Effective FG% Allowed	54.3%	54.8%	-0.5%
Assisted Field Goals	57%	57%	+0%
Assisted FG% Allowed	63%	61%	+2%
Own Shots Blocked	6%	5%	+1%
Shots Blocked	5%	4%	+1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	22.0%	25.1%	-3.2%
Defensive Rebounding	75.5%	75.5%	+0.1%
Total Rebounding	48.8%	50.3%	-1.5%
Stats
Free Throws Made	18	16	+2
Free Throws Attempted	24	21	+3
Free Throws Made by Opp.	15	15	+0
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	20	19	-1
Turnovers, on Offense	12	13	+1
Turnovers, on Defense	12	13	-1
Net Turnovers	0	0	+0
Fouls Committed	18	17	-1
Fouls, Drawn	19	18	+1
Net Fouls	1	1	+0

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts