Trey Burke of the Philadelphia 76ers, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Trey Burke
Philadelphia 76ers
2019-2020 NBA Season

More Trey Burke stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
9%	+39	1.16	1.11	5.8	12	10	54.5

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.4 5.1 .465 .528 54% 6% .5 5.9

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 68% .523   68% 1% 3.6

Close 32% .537   32% 17% 1.8

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 32% .537   32% 17% 1.8

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 42% .453   60% 6% 1.9

11-15 28% .653   48% 6% 1.9

16-20 19% .563   58% 4% 1.1

21+ 11% .429   50% 14% .5

Crunch 30% .513   56% 8% 1.6

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
13	18	72.2	2.7	1.9	132	5	3.8%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
19	6	20	8	53	6	8.8	12.7	7.9

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
14	334	4.2%	33.2%	20	323	6.2%	74.0%	10.4	107.2

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	0		%	%	%	1	.1	.2%	5	.20	.2

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
3	6	3		30.1

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Burke-Richardson-EnnisIII-Scott-Embiid	31	1.28	1.10	10	6	3	66
2	Burke-Richardson-Korkmaz-Scott-Embiid	28	1.15	.88	18	6	2	75
3	Burke-Richardson-Harris-Scott-Embiid	18	1.32	1.17	4	3	2	60
4	Neto-Burke-Milton-Pelle-O'Quinn	13	1.33	1.17	5	2	0	100
5	Burke-Simmons-Richardson-Harris-Embiid	11	1.14	1.20	1	2	1	66
6	Burke-Simmons-Korkmaz-Harris-Horford	9	1.05	.90	3	2	0	100
7	Burke-Richardson-Korkmaz-Scott-Horford	7	1.40	.80	9	4	0	100
8	Burke-Richardson-EnnisIII-Harris-Pelle	6	.55	1.23	-10	0	2	0
9	Neto-Burke-Milton-Thybulle-O'Quinn	6	.31	1.17	-10	0	1	0
10	Burke-Simmons-EnnisIII-Harris-Horford	5	1.67	.83	10	1	0	100
11	Burke-Simmons-Harris-Scott-Horford	5	1.38	1.22	0	1	1	50
12	Burke-Milton-EnnisIII-Scott-Embiid	5	1.67	1.78	-1	0	1	0
13	Neto-Burke-EnnisIII-Scott-O'Quinn	5	1.27	1.00	3	1	1	50
14	Burke-Thybulle-Harris-Scott-Embiid	5	.70	.45	2	1	1	50
15	Burke-Richardson-EnnisIII-Harris-Horford	5	.78	1.20	-5	0	2	0
16	Burke-Korkmaz-Thybulle-Scott-Embiid	5	1.17	1.00	3	1	1	50
17	Neto-Burke-Korkmaz-Pelle-O'Quinn	4	.64	.83	-1	1	1	50
18	Burke-Richardson-Korkmaz-Pelle-Scott	4	.90	1.11	-1	1	1	50
19	Burke-Richardson-EnnisIII-Harris-O'Quinn	4	1.70	1.11	7	1	0	100
20	Burke-Simmons-Richardson-Harris-Horford	4	1.00	1.29	-2	1	1	50

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Burke-Richardson-EnnisIII-Scott-Embiid .440 .450 -5 24% 35%   61% +9%

2 Burke-Richardson-Korkmaz-Scott-Embiid .460 .360 +9 25% 25%   54% +1%

3 Burke-Richardson-Harris-Scott-Embiid .590 .440 +1 31% 35%   50% -6%

4 Neto-Burke-Milton-Pelle-O'Quinn .590 .440 +4 52% 22%   45% +7%

5 Burke-Simmons-Richardson-Harris-Embiid .550 .420 -7 35% 42%   57% -18%

6 Burke-Simmons-Korkmaz-Harris-Horford .500 .360 -1 25% 43%   43% +15%

7 Burke-Richardson-Korkmaz-Scott-Horford .600 .360 -2 27% 36%   64% -7%

8 Burke-Richardson-EnnisIII-Harris-Pelle .270 .500 -2 36% 50%   44% -4%

9 Neto-Burke-Milton-Thybulle-O'Quinn .110 .550 0 44% 18%   36% -14%

10 Burke-Simmons-EnnisIII-Harris-Horford .640 .500 +3 36% 60%   54% +25%

11 Burke-Simmons-Harris-Scott-Horford .420 .440 -2 17% 44%   54% +22%

12 Burke-Milton-EnnisIII-Scott-Embiid .670 .700 0 22% 20%   50% -11%

13 Neto-Burke-EnnisIII-Scott-O'Quinn .500 .400 -1 50% 30%   50% +18%

14 Burke-Thybulle-Harris-Scott-Embiid .380 .250 +1 50% 13%   60% -3%

15 Burke-Richardson-EnnisIII-Harris-Horford .330 .440 -4 11% 11%   30% +10%

16 Burke-Korkmaz-Thybulle-Scott-Embiid .420 .400 +2 33% 30%   46% +18%

17 Neto-Burke-Korkmaz-Pelle-O'Quinn .250 .330 +4 33% 33%   37% +18%

18 Burke-Richardson-Korkmaz-Pelle-Scott .400 .400 0 10% 50%   50% -9%

19 Burke-Richardson-EnnisIII-Harris-O'Quinn .670 .670 -2 58% 50%   70% +22%

20 Burke-Simmons-Richardson-Harris-Horford .380 .570 +2 25% 29%   63% 0%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	7%	+42	110.3	102.8	7.5	11	10	52%
SG	1%	-5	109.4	113.6	-4.2	5	5	50%
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	17.8	.525	2.6	31%	5.4	8.0	1.7	.2	3.3	20.6	17.5
SG	26.3	.540	3.2	36%	3.2	7.4	2.1	.0	2.1	30.5	20.7
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 18.5 .476 5.2 25% 4.9 7.7 2.4 1.0 3.8 21.4 15.8

SG 12.6 .708 4.2 8% 5.3 5.3 3.2 .0 2.1 21.0 19.1

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG -.7 .048 -2.6 6% .5 .3 .7 -.9 .5 -.9 1.7

SG 13.7 -.168 -1.1 28% -2.1 2.1 1.1 .0 .0 9.5 1.6

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
10%	+10	125.6	86.3	39.2	3	1	75.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 3.9 3.9 1.000 .000 0% 0% 7.8 7.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 100% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 100% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	2	100.0	7.8	7.8	1	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	1	0	1	0	1.0	0.0	3.9

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	9	0.0%	22.2%	0	13	0.0%	84.6%	0.0	106.8

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	0.5

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	321	3129	9%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	117.1	113.0	+4.1
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	111.0	110.6	+0.4
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+6.2	+2.4	+3.7
Points Scored	737	7347	-6610
Points Allowed	698	7212	-6514
Net Points	+39	+135	-96
Effective FG%	52.4%	53.4%	-1.0%
Effective FG% Allowed	52.2%	52.4%	-0.1%
Assisted Field Goals	59%	63%	-4%
Assisted FG% Allowed	55%	57%	-2%
Own Shots Blocked	4%	4%	+0%
Shots Blocked	6%	6%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	33.2%	26.7%	+6.6%
Defensive Rebounding	74.0%	76.5%	-2.5%
Total Rebounding	53.6%	51.6%	+2.0%
Stats
Free Throws Made	15	17	-2
Free Throws Attempted	21	22	-1
Free Throws Made by Opp.	17	18	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	22	25	+3
Turnovers, on Offense	11	14	+3
Turnovers, on Defense	14	14	+0
Net Turnovers	3	0	-3
Fouls Committed	21	21	+0
Fouls, Drawn	19	20	-1
Net Fouls	-2	-1	+1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts