Khem Birch of the Orlando Magic, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Khem Birch
Orlando Magic
2019-2020 NBA Season

More Khem Birch stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
26%	-129	1.06	1.13	-6.9	20	25	44.4

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 1.5 3.0 .510 .510 67% 7% 1.4 4.4

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 38% .426   39% 4% 1.0

Close 48% .456   74% 10% 1.3

Dunk 15% .905   89% 5% .8

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 62% .562   80% 9% 2.1

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 52% .541   43% 7% 1.7

11-15 17% .440   100% 16% .5

16-20 20% .586   100% 0% .7

21+ 10% .333   80% 7% .2

Crunch 31% .500   95% 2% .9

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
66	101	65.3	5.4	3.5	189	46	24.3%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
26	14	7	3	50	3	16.7	3.2	2.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
92	1003	9.2%	26.8%	129	888	14.5%	76.4%	23.7	103.2

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
4	18	1	%	4%	1%	23	1.2	1.4%	48	.48	4.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
12	3	16		8.2

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Fultz-Fournier-Gordon-Birch-Vucevic	138	1.08	1.15	-20	3	7	30
2	Fultz-Fournier-Isaac-Gordon-Birch	101	1.05	1.14	-22	2	5	28
3	Fultz-Fournier-Iwundu-Isaac-Birch	43	1.23	1.08	13	3	1	75
4	Fultz-Fournier-Ross-Isaac-Birch	37	1.00	1.09	-8	1	6	14
5	Augustin-Fultz-Fournier-Isaac-Birch	29	1.27	1.10	11	4	1	80
6	Fultz-Carter-Williams-Ross-Isaac-Birch	29	1.38	1.29	11	2	0	100
7	Fultz-Fournier-Ross-Birch-Vucevic	25	1.15	1.30	-9	3	4	42
8	Augustin-Ross-Iwundu-Birch-Bamba	17	1.14	.97	6	2	1	66
9	Augustin-Fournier-Ross-Birch-Bamba	17	1.06	1.00	1	1	1	50
10	Fultz-Fournier-Iwundu-Birch-Vucevic	17	1.15	1.09	1	1	0	100
11	Augustin-Ross-Iwundu-Isaac-Birch	16	.76	.69	0	2	3	40
12	Fultz-Iwundu-Gordon-Birch-Vucevic	14	1.27	1.09	5	1	1	50
13	Fultz-Ross-Iwundu-Clark-Birch	14	1.16	1.25	1	2	1	66
14	Carter-Williams-Fournier-Ross-Birch-Bamba	13	1.07	1.00	2	2	2	50
15	Carter-Williams-Ross-Iwundu-Birch-Bamba	12	1.48	1.00	14	2	0	100
16	Fultz-Ross-Iwundu-Gordon-Birch	12	1.00	1.04	-2	0	1	0
17	Augustin-Fournier-Isaac-Gordon-Birch	12	.88	.84	1	1	0	100
18	Fultz-Fournier-Ross-Gordon-Birch	11	.81	1.13	-4	1	3	25
19	Augustin-Fultz-Fournier-Birch-Vucevic	11	1.68	1.14	13	4	0	100
20	Fultz-FrazierJr.-Johnson-Law-Birch	11	.96	.92	3	1	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Fultz-Fournier-Gordon-Birch-Vucevic .460 .530 +15 34% 33%   55% +2%

2 Fultz-Fournier-Isaac-Gordon-Birch .430 .480 +13 28% 35%   55% -4%

3 Fultz-Fournier-Iwundu-Isaac-Birch .570 .520 -13 38% 35%   48% +14%

4 Fultz-Fournier-Ross-Isaac-Birch .380 .480 -13 32% 48%   48% +13%

5 Augustin-Fultz-Fournier-Isaac-Birch .510 .440 +7 34% 28%   56% -4%

6 Fultz-Carter-Williams-Ross-Isaac-Birch .540 .510 +12 23% 33%   53% +1%

7 Fultz-Fournier-Ross-Birch-Vucevic .370 .660 +9 31% 44%   61% +9%

8 Augustin-Ross-Iwundu-Birch-Bamba .390 .340 +7 18% 31%   34% +11%

9 Augustin-Fournier-Ross-Birch-Bamba .460 .390 0 39% 27%   45% -6%

10 Fultz-Fournier-Iwundu-Birch-Vucevic .500 .430 +2 39% 23%   61% -9%

11 Augustin-Ross-Iwundu-Isaac-Birch .300 .240 -6 30% 16%   60% -9%

12 Fultz-Iwundu-Gordon-Birch-Vucevic .480 .530 +11 59% 40%   59% +2%

13 Fultz-Ross-Iwundu-Clark-Birch .480 .500 -4 21% 31%   42% +4%

14 Carter-Williams-Fournier-Ross-Birch-Bamba .480 .330 -9 33% 42%   50% 0%

15 Carter-Williams-Ross-Iwundu-Birch-Bamba .410 .440 +7 31% 33%   78% +16%

16 Fultz-Ross-Iwundu-Gordon-Birch .400 .400 +3 40% 40%   52% -13%

17 Augustin-Fournier-Isaac-Gordon-Birch .350 .350 +2 25% 35%   40% -4%

18 Fultz-Fournier-Ross-Gordon-Birch .270 .460 +3 23% 45%   52% -14%

19 Augustin-Fultz-Fournier-Birch-Vucevic .620 .560 +4 52% 50%   50% +19%

20 Fultz-FrazierJr.-Johnson-Law-Birch .390 .450 +5 26% 50%   61% +6%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	9%	-2	108.1	108.3	-.1	9	7	56%
C	16%	-129	102.4	113.2	-10.8	13	21	38%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	6.5	.533	4.5	66%	11.2	1.9	1.4	.7	3.5	10.4	13.0
C	8.2	.500	5.9	60%	12.1	3.1	1.8	1.5	5.6	11.8	14.2

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 14.6 .564 2.8 27% 10.9 2.9 3.0 .9 5.1 18.7 13.0

C 14.7 .603 4.5 48% 13.8 3.4 2.3 1.6 5.5 20.9 20.9

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF -8.1 -.031 1.7 39% .3 -1.0 1.6 -.1 1.6 -8.3 .1

C -6.5 -.103 1.3 12% -1.7 -.3 .5 -.1 -.2 -9.2 -6.7

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
14%	+5	100.5	85.7	14.8	3	1	75.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 3.0 5.9 .500 .500 0% 50% 8.9 14.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 100% .500   0% 50% 0.5

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 100% .500   0% 50% 0.5

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 100% .500   0% 50% 0.5

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 100% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
3	4	75.0	11.8	8.9	3	1	33.3%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
1	0	0	0	1	0	1.0	-3.0	3.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
4	24	16.7%	37.5%	3	19	15.8%	78.9%	32.5	116.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-2.9

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	901	2547	26%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	106.0	111.2	-5.2
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	112.6	110.2	+2.4
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-6.6	+1.0	-7.6
Points Scored	1964	5867	-3903
Points Allowed	2093	5812	-3719
Net Points	-129	+55	-184
Effective FG%	48.3%	51.4%	-3.1%
Effective FG% Allowed	54.8%	53.1%	+1.7%
Assisted Field Goals	55%	62%	-7%
Assisted FG% Allowed	60%	61%	-1%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Shots Blocked	5%	6%	-1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	26.8%	24.7%	+2.1%
Defensive Rebounding	76.4%	75.6%	+0.8%
Total Rebounding	51.6%	50.1%	+1.4%
Stats
Free Throws Made	18	17	+1
Free Throws Attempted	24	22	+2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	16	15	-1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	20	19	-1
Turnovers, on Offense	14	12	-2
Turnovers, on Defense	15	14	+1
Net Turnovers	1	2	+1
Fouls Committed	19	18	-1
Fouls, Drawn	20	19	+1
Net Fouls	1	1	+0

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts