Frank Jackson of the New Orleans Pelicans, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Frank Jackson
New Orleans Pelicans
2019-2020 NBA Season

More Frank Jackson stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
22%	-59	1.14	1.18	-3.6	26	32	44.8

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.3 5.6 .405 .476 63% 5% .9 6.3

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 69% .469   65% 2% 3.6

Close 30% .469   61% 13% 1.6

Dunk 1% 1.000   50% 0% .1

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 31% .490   60% 13% 1.7

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 50% .533   62% 5% 3.0

11-15 34% .402   61% 5% 1.5

16-20 12% .487   80% 5% .6

21+ 4% .357   60% 7% .2

Crunch 16% .453   75% 6% .8

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
56	75	74.7	4.6	3.4	362	31	8.6%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
30	7	12	12	61	11	5.5	5.3	3.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
22	855	2.6%	26.3%	61	844	7.2%	72.6%	9.8	98.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
	4		%	1%	%	4	.2	.3%	35	.11	.8

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
12	11	26		12.8

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Jackson-Alexander-Walker-Hart-Melli-Hayes	39	.90	1.23	-32	1	6	14
2	Jackson-Ball-Redick-Ingram-Favors	17	1.14	.95	7	2	3	40
3	Jackson-Ball-Hart-Ingram-Favors	16	1.17	1.00	5	1	3	25
4	Jackson-Alexander-Walker-Williams-Melli-Hayes	14	1.38	1.03	13	1	1	50
5	Jackson-Ball-Moore-Hart-Melli	13	1.39	1.03	12	6	1	85
6	Jackson-Alexander-Walker-Thornwell-Williams-Okafor	12	1.48	1.48	0	0	0	0
7	Jackson-Moore-Alexander-Walker-Hart-Melli	12	1.24	1.00	9	2	1	66
8	Jackson-Moore-Alexander-Walker-Ingram-Hayes	12	1.34	1.31	1	4	2	66
9	Jackson-Holiday-Redick-Williams-Favors	12	1.60	1.28	3	1	2	33
10	Jackson-Redick-Hart-Melli-Hayes	11	1.00	1.04	0	3	1	75
11	Jackson-Ball-Hart-Ingram-Okafor	11	1.50	1.08	11	3	1	75
12	Jackson-Alexander-Walker-Hart-Williams-Melli	11	1.54	1.04	13	2	0	100
13	Jackson-Holiday-Redick-Hart-Hayes	10	1.15	1.04	1	2	1	66
14	Jackson-Moore-Hart-Ingram-Melli	10	.48	1.43	-20	0	2	0
15	Jackson-Alexander-Walker-Hart-Williams-Hayes	10	.95	1.19	-5	1	3	25
16	Jackson-Moore-Alexander-Walker-Williams-Hayes	9	1.40	.75	13	2	2	50
17	Jackson-Redick-Alexander-Walker-Hart-Hayes	9	1.33	1.41	-3	0	1	0
18	Jackson-Ball-Hart-Ingram-Melli	9	1.20	1.00	5	1	2	33
19	Jackson-Holiday-Williamson-Ingram-Favors	9	.91	1.16	-8	2	3	40
20	Jackson-Alexander-Walker-Williams-Ingram-Melli	8	1.16	1.05	2	2	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Jackson-Alexander-Walker-Hart-Melli-Hayes .440 .510 -7 32% 33%   47% -7%

2 Jackson-Ball-Redick-Ingram-Favors .460 .330 +4 32% 39%   43% -5%

3 Jackson-Ball-Hart-Ingram-Favors .480 .420 +6 56% 39%   54% +2%

4 Jackson-Alexander-Walker-Williams-Melli-Hayes .570 .400 +3 50% 48%   48% +16%

5 Jackson-Ball-Moore-Hart-Melli .540 .450 +3 27% 52%   46% +1%

6 Jackson-Alexander-Walker-Thornwell-Williams-Okafor .700 .670 -7 57% 33%   54% +4%

7 Jackson-Moore-Alexander-Walker-Hart-Melli .480 .550 -4 21% 64%   42% +16%

8 Jackson-Moore-Alexander-Walker-Ingram-Hayes .650 .540 -3 39% 35%   44% -6%

9 Jackson-Holiday-Redick-Williams-Favors .500 .580 +2 27% 33%   62% +12%

10 Jackson-Redick-Hart-Melli-Hayes .330 .320 -5 11% 23%   47% +8%

11 Jackson-Ball-Hart-Ingram-Okafor .620 .440 +11 33% 36%   64% -4%

12 Jackson-Alexander-Walker-Hart-Williams-Melli .590 .430 +1 32% 43%   45% +9%

13 Jackson-Holiday-Redick-Hart-Hayes .440 .400 +4 22% 36%   58% -16%

14 Jackson-Moore-Hart-Ingram-Melli .210 .680 -2 32% 68%   43% -14%

15 Jackson-Alexander-Walker-Hart-Williams-Hayes .310 .500 +8 38% 22%   54% +5%

16 Jackson-Moore-Alexander-Walker-Williams-Hayes .580 .330 +1 26% 40%   58% +15%

17 Jackson-Redick-Alexander-Walker-Hart-Hayes .570 .500 -12 38% 50%   39% 0%

18 Jackson-Ball-Hart-Ingram-Melli .410 .410 +4 18% 24%   45% +5%

19 Jackson-Holiday-Williamson-Ingram-Favors .440 .520 +1 61% 33%   67% -13%

20 Jackson-Alexander-Walker-Williams-Ingram-Melli .530 .350 0 29% 35%   34% +5%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	22%	-59	120.3	124.0	-3.6	26	32	44%
SG
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	20.3	.476	4.6	30%	5.1	3.7	3.0	.2	4.7	22.8	10.4
SG
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 24.7 .524 7.7 32% 6.9 8.3 3.4 .3 4.0 32.4 22.0

SG

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG -4.4 -.048 -3.1 -2% -1.8 -4.6 .4 -.1 -.7 -9.6 -11.6

SG

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
20%	+15	135.4	108.6	26.7	5	4	55.6%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 7.1 14.2 .500 .625 75% 0% 3.5 21.3

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 63% .600   100% 0% 0.5

Close 38% .667   50% 0% 0.4

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 38% .667   50% 0% 0.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 38% .500   100% 0% 0.3

11-15 25% .750   100% 0% 0.3

16-20 25% .500   100% 0% 0.2

21+ 13% 1.000   0% 0% 0.2

Crunch 38% .667   50% 0% 0.4

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	2	100.0	3.5	3.5	8	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	-3.5	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
3	33	9.1%	36.4%	3	31	9.7%	67.7%	18.8	104.1

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	1	0	-1.3

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	782	2636	22%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	113.7	111.6	+2.1
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	117.3	112.8	+4.5
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-3.6	-1.1	-2.4
Points Scored	1962	6379	-4417
Points Allowed	2021	6413	-4392
Net Points	-59	-34	-25
Effective FG%	53.8%	53.9%	-0.2%
Effective FG% Allowed	54.1%	52.9%	+1.2%
Assisted Field Goals	60%	63%	-3%
Assisted FG% Allowed	56%	57%	-1%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	26.3%	27.7%	-1.4%
Defensive Rebounding	72.6%	74.5%	-1.8%
Total Rebounding	49.5%	51.1%	-1.6%
Stats
Free Throws Made	19	16	+3
Free Throws Attempted	27	22	+5
Free Throws Made by Opp.	21	19	-2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	27	24	-3
Turnovers, on Offense	15	16	+1
Turnovers, on Defense	14	14	+0
Net Turnovers	-1	-2	-1
Fouls Committed	24	20	-4
Fouls, Drawn	24	20	+4
Net Fouls	0	0	+0

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts