Gorgui Dieng of the Minnesota Timberwolves, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Gorgui Dieng
Minnesota Timberwolves
2019-2020 NBA Season

More Gorgui Dieng stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
24%	-102	1.01	1.06	-6.4	14	30	31.8

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.7 6.0 .446 .529 80% 6% 1.0 7.4

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 71% .505   86% 2% 4.3

Close 23% .524   73% 21% 1.4

Dunk 6% .824   64% 12% .6

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 29% .587   70% 19% 2.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 45% .516   67% 9% 2.8

11-15 35% .573   89% 4% 2.4

16-20 13% .571   88% 3% .9

21+ 8% .333   100% 10% .3

Crunch 20% .482   91% 5% 1.2

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
47	59	79.7	3.7	3.0	302	24	7.9%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
26	14	15	3	58	9	6.4	4.0	3.6

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
73	871	8.4%	25.0%	183	806	22.7%	73.6%	31.1	98.6

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
8	32	2	1%	7%	3%	42	2.6	3.0%	46	.91	8.3

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
7	9	28		10.4

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Napier-Culver-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng	99	1.16	1.11	14	5	8	38
2	Napier-Okogie-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng	65	.97	1.05	-8	6	8	42
3	Napier-Culver-Martin-Covington-Dieng	53	1.13	.89	24	5	0	100
4	Teague-Graham-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng	34	1.01	1.12	-6	2	2	50
5	Teague-Okogie-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng	31	1.03	.78	17	5	2	71
6	Teague-Okogie-Wiggins-Bates-Diop-Dieng	18	1.14	1.11	-2	2	4	33
7	Napier-Teague-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng	15	.88	1.15	-10	1	3	25
8	Napier-Graham-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng	15	1.13	1.06	3	2	0	100
9	Teague-Culver-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng	14	1.39	1.41	2	2	3	40
10	Napier-Okogie-Culver-Covington-Dieng	13	.79	1.14	-11	0	4	0
11	Okogie-Culver-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng	13	1.00	1.13	-5	2	3	40
12	McLaughlin-Culver-Crabbe-Bates-Diop-Dieng	12	.56	1.16	-15	0	3	0
13	Napier-Graham-Culver-Covington-Dieng	12	.96	1.00	-1	0	1	0
14	Culver-Wiggins-Covington-Bates-Diop-Dieng	11	1.00	.55	13	3	0	100
15	McLaughlin-Okogie-Culver-Bates-Diop-Dieng	11	.92	1.08	-4	0	2	0
16	McLaughlin-Okogie-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng	11	1.83	1.22	14	2	1	66
17	McLaughlin-Graham-Martin-Wiggins-Dieng	11	1.37	1.07	8	1	0	100
18	Napier-Teague-Wiggins-Bates-Diop-Dieng	10	.75	1.32	-15	0	4	0
19	Teague-Nowell-Culver-Bates-Diop-Dieng	8	1.41	1.06	6	1	0	100
20	Graham-Culver-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng	8	.69	1.33	-13	0	3	0

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Napier-Culver-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng .480 .480 -8 29% 38%   48% +4%

2 Napier-Okogie-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng .400 .480 +1 33% 32%   50% +6%

3 Napier-Culver-Martin-Covington-Dieng .460 .420 -9 32% 40%   57% +3%

4 Teague-Graham-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng .400 .430 +4 28% 35%   47% -8%

5 Teague-Okogie-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng .430 .290 -10 27% 27%   53% +1%

6 Teague-Okogie-Wiggins-Bates-Diop-Dieng .410 .460 +8 37% 34%   45% +5%

7 Napier-Teague-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng .300 .500 +2 26% 36%   53% -7%

8 Napier-Graham-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng .460 .480 -3 21% 35%   60% +1%

9 Teague-Culver-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng .560 .650 -2 22% 22%   56% -3%

10 Napier-Okogie-Culver-Covington-Dieng .280 .480 +6 33% 41%   43% -11%

11 Okogie-Culver-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng .420 .480 -2 42% 40%   50% -4%

12 McLaughlin-Culver-Crabbe-Bates-Diop-Dieng .220 .520 +2 39% 63%   35% 0%

13 Napier-Graham-Culver-Covington-Dieng .410 .390 -2 32% 26%   33% +8%

14 Culver-Wiggins-Covington-Bates-Diop-Dieng .420 .260 0 27% 43%   57% +3%

15 McLaughlin-Okogie-Culver-Bates-Diop-Dieng .330 .480 +8 28% 48%   54% -12%

16 McLaughlin-Okogie-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng .780 .500 +2 44% 22%   54% 0%

17 McLaughlin-Graham-Martin-Wiggins-Dieng .520 .530 -5 37% 33%   59% +18%

18 Napier-Teague-Wiggins-Bates-Diop-Dieng .350 .480 -4 41% 39%   27% -4%

19 Teague-Nowell-Culver-Bates-Diop-Dieng .600 .500 -1 33% 21%   58% 0%

20 Graham-Culver-Wiggins-Covington-Dieng .270 .420 0 36% 53%   39% -9%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C	24%	-102	101.5	107.9	-6.4	14	30	31%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF
C	17.5	.529	3.7	28%	16.1	3.6	2.8	2.6	5.6	21.4	23.5

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF

C 15.8 .546 5.6 46% 16.2 4.1 3.3 2.6 5.2 20.8 24.4

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF

C 1.7 -.017 -1.9 -18% -.1 -.4 .5 .1 -.4 .6 -.8

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
31%	-6	97.0	105.3	-8.3	0	0	0.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 8.3 18.0 .462 .500 33% 8% 9.7 27.7

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 85% .409   25% 9% 0.9

Close 8% 1.000   0% 0% 0.2

Dunk 8% 1.000   100% 0% 0.2

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 15% 1.000   50% 0% 0.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 38% .700   33% 0% 0.7

11-15 38% .600   33% 0% 0.6

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 23% .000   0% 33% 0.0

Crunch 31% .000   0% 25% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
7	10	70.0	13.9	9.7	16	3	18.8%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	1	0	0	1	0	1.0	-1.4	1.4

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
7	36	19.4%	30.6%	12	36	33.3%	83.3%	52.8	113.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	1	0	0%	5%	0%	1	1.4	1.6%	2	0.50	5.6

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	1	0	5.9

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	763	2290	24%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	101.1	112.0	-10.9
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	106.5	116.2	-9.7
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-5.4	-4.2	-1.2
Points Scored	1613	5635	-4022
Points Allowed	1715	5808	-4093
Net Points	-102	-173	+71
Effective FG%	47.8%	52.5%	-4.7%
Effective FG% Allowed	50.2%	55.3%	-5.2%
Assisted Field Goals	60%	58%	+2%
Assisted FG% Allowed	57%	56%	+1%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	6%	-1%
Shots Blocked	7%	5%	+2%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	25.0%	25.4%	-0.4%
Defensive Rebounding	73.6%	74.5%	-0.9%
Total Rebounding	49.3%	50.0%	-0.7%
Stats
Free Throws Made	16	20	-4
Free Throws Attempted	21	26	-5
Free Throws Made by Opp.	19	20	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	24	25	+1
Turnovers, on Offense	16	15	-1
Turnovers, on Defense	16	15	+1
Net Turnovers	0	0	+0
Fouls Committed	21	21	+0
Fouls, Drawn	20	22	-2
Net Fouls	-1	1	+2

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts