Nicolas Batum of the Charlotte Hornets, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Nicolas Batum
Charlotte Hornets
2019-2020 NBA Season

More Nicolas Batum stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
16%	-48	1.13	1.17	-4.7	7	15	31.8

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 1.3 3.7 .346 .432 57% 5% .4 3.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 81% .394   68% 2% 2.4

Close 15% .500   17% 25% .5

Dunk 4% 1.000   67% 0% .3

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 19% .600   33% 20% .8

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 40% .469   42% 6% 1.4

11-15 23% .579   67% 0% 1.0

16-20 25% .250   75% 10% .5

21+ 12% .400   67% 0% .4

Crunch 37% .300   71% 7% .8

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
9	10	90.0	1.0	.9	85	4	4.7%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
26	8	19	12	65	10	6.5	9.7	6.3

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
24	507	4.7%	24.5%	75	495	15.2%	72.3%	19.9	96.8

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
3	5		1%	2%	%	8	.8	.9%	13	.62	2.1

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
	10	12		18.1

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Graham-Monk-Batum-Williams-Biyombo	38	1.30	.96	26	6	1	85
2	Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Batum-Biyombo	34	1.16	1.20	-4	2	3	40
3	Rozier-Graham-Batum-Washington-Zeller	26	1.12	1.02	8	4	3	57
4	Rozier-Graham-Batum-Washington-Biyombo	19	1.18	.74	20	4	2	66
5	Rozier-Graham-Batum-Williams-Zeller	19	1.07	.95	6	1	2	33
6	Graham-Monk-Batum-Williams-Zeller	16	1.26	1.00	5	5	2	71
7	Rozier-Monk-Batum-Washington-Williams	16	1.30	1.00	10	3	2	60
8	Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Batum-Zeller	15	1.00	1.15	-5	1	2	33
9	Graham-Monk-Batum-Washington-Williams	15	1.64	1.07	15	4	0	100
10	Rozier-Bridges-Batum-Washington-Biyombo	14	1.18	1.70	-13	1	5	16
11	Rozier-Graham-Batum-Williams-Biyombo	14	1.11	1.24	-5	2	2	50
12	Rozier-Bridges-Batum-Washington-Zeller	13	1.12	1.37	-8	3	4	42
13	Graham-Bacon-Bridges-Batum-Zeller	13	1.38	1.29	2	1	1	50
14	Rozier-Monk-Batum-Williams-Biyombo	11	1.30	1.14	5	3	1	75
15	Rozier-Monk-Batum-Williams-Zeller	11	.70	1.00	-3	2	3	40
16	Rozier-Monk-Bridges-Batum-Biyombo	11	1.32	1.26	0	2	3	40
17	Rozier-Graham-Batum-Washington-Williams	8	1.53	1.18	3	1	2	33
18	Rozier-Monk-Bridges-Batum-Williams	8	.84	.85	-1	2	3	40
19	Graham-Monk-Batum-Washington-Zeller	6	1.31	1.42	0	2	1	66
20	Graham-Monk-Bridges-Batum-Williams	6	1.18	1.07	-3	1	2	33

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Graham-Monk-Batum-Williams-Biyombo .500 .360 +12 33% 35%   55% +3%

2 Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Batum-Biyombo .460 .510 +5 34% 39%   41% +11%

3 Rozier-Graham-Batum-Washington-Zeller .430 .500 +1 14% 41%   47% +6%

4 Rozier-Graham-Batum-Washington-Biyombo .490 .380 +5 36% 41%   49% +7%

5 Rozier-Graham-Batum-Williams-Zeller .460 .470 -4 29% 27%   55% 0%

6 Graham-Monk-Batum-Williams-Zeller .490 .460 -1 30% 39%   62% -5%

7 Rozier-Monk-Batum-Washington-Williams .480 .360 0 29% 36%   50% 0%

8 Rozier-Graham-Bridges-Batum-Zeller .480 .610 0 44% 39%   53% +6%

9 Graham-Monk-Batum-Washington-Williams .640 .440 -3 36% 44%   50% +13%

10 Rozier-Bridges-Batum-Washington-Biyombo .440 .700 -3 41% 26%   68% -14%

11 Rozier-Graham-Batum-Williams-Biyombo .410 .480 -1 22% 33%   47% -1%

12 Rozier-Bridges-Batum-Washington-Zeller .420 .420 -1 62% 42%   54% -20%

13 Graham-Bacon-Bridges-Batum-Zeller .590 .520 +3 45% 40%   57% -12%

14 Rozier-Monk-Batum-Williams-Biyombo .520 .350 -10 30% 10%   37% +5%

15 Rozier-Monk-Batum-Williams-Zeller .400 .440 -2 20% 28%   35% -19%

16 Rozier-Monk-Bridges-Batum-Biyombo .620 .500 +1 29% 27%   38% +12%

17 Rozier-Graham-Batum-Washington-Williams .670 .570 0 58% 43%   44% +5%

18 Rozier-Monk-Bridges-Batum-Williams .390 .400 -2 38% 60%   40% +4%

19 Graham-Monk-Batum-Washington-Zeller .500 .640 +2 58% 36%   71% -14%

20 Graham-Monk-Bridges-Batum-Williams .670 .440 -1 67% 44%   38% -12%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF	10%	+5	107.2	106.3	.9	11	11	50%
PF	5%	-54	108.0	123.0	-15.1	6	14	30%
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF	8.2	.364	.9	14%	10.5	7.0	2.7	.9	3.3	6.7	11.7
PF	7.3	.577	1.1	26%	7.8	5.0	1.1	.6	5.3	9.5	12.6
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF 17.7 .454 4.0 33% 9.1 3.6 2.1 .7 3.9 19.2 19.4

PF 19.5 .657 1.1 25% 9.2 5.9 3.9 .3 5.0 26.8 28.1

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF -9.5 -.090 -3.1 -19% 1.5 3.4 -.6 .1 .6 -12.5 -7.7

PF -12.3 -.080 .0 1% -1.4 -.8 2.8 .3 -.3 -17.3 -15.5

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
18%	-3	97.2	102.4	-5.2	2	5	28.6%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 1.7 1.7 1.000 .000 0% 0% 0.0 0.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	1.7	0.0	1	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	1	1	2	0	2.0	6.9	3.5

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	22	0.0%	18.2%	4	28	14.3%	78.6%	14.3	96.8

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	10.9

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	495	2597	16%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	111.4	106.9	+4.5
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	115.0	114.1	+0.9
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-3.6	-7.1	+3.5
Points Scored	1109	5578	-4469
Points Allowed	1157	5969	-4812
Net Points	-48	-391	+343
Effective FG%	53.7%	49.8%	+4.0%
Effective FG% Allowed	54.9%	54.6%	+0.2%
Assisted Field Goals	66%	63%	+3%
Assisted FG% Allowed	66%	63%	+3%
Own Shots Blocked	4%	6%	-2%
Shots Blocked	5%	4%	+1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	24.5%	27.3%	-2.8%
Defensive Rebounding	72.3%	71.9%	+0.5%
Total Rebounding	48.4%	49.6%	-1.2%
Stats
Free Throws Made	14	16	-2
Free Throws Attempted	18	22	-4
Free Throws Made by Opp.	15	13	-2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	21	17	-4
Turnovers, on Offense	14	14	+0
Turnovers, on Defense	14	14	+0
Net Turnovers	0	0	+0
Fouls Committed	21	18	-3
Fouls, Drawn	19	20	-1
Net Fouls	-2	2	+4

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts