Ed Davis of the Brooklyn Nets, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Ed Davis
Brooklyn Nets
2018-2019 NBA Season

More Ed Davis stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
36%	+95	1.1	1.06	3.2	42	36	53.8

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.3 3.7 .616 .616 60% 8% 1.2 5.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 28% .476   23% 4% 1.0

Close 58% .614   69% 11% 2.7

Dunk 14% .905   76% 2% .9

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 72% .670   71% 10% 3.6

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 62% .640   40% 3% 2.9

11-15 22% .585   92% 15% .9

16-20 11% .588   100% 15% .5

21+ 6% .529   100% 18% .2

Crunch 17% .569   100% 16% .7

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
100	162	61.7	5.5	3.4	381	79	20.7%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
34	12	12	3	61	9	6.8	2.2	2.1

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
216	1566	13.8%	29.1%	479	1535	31.2%	75.8%	45.0	104.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
5	24	4	%	3%	4%	33	1.1	1.3%	120	.28	3.8

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
29	9	26	1	6.6

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Russell-Dinwiddie-Dudley-Carroll-Davis	71	1.08	1.03	5	7	6	53
2	Napier-Russell-Dudley-Carroll-Davis	50	1.11	1.00	8	5	4	55
3	Russell-Dudley-Carroll-Kurucs-Davis	44	1.17	.90	29	10	1	90
4	Napier-Russell-Hollis-Jefferson-Carroll-Davis	44	1.25	.98	19	6	2	75
5	Napier-Dinwiddie-Harris-Crabbe-Davis	44	1.23	1.11	10	4	3	57
6	Napier-Dinwiddie-Crabbe-Hollis-Jefferson-Davis	39	.95	1.05	-2	4	4	50
7	Dinwiddie-LeVert-Dudley-Carroll-Davis	38	.96	1.26	-33	1	6	14
8	Napier-Dinwiddie-Hollis-Jefferson-Carroll-Davis	34	1.04	.96	0	2	3	40
9	Napier-Dinwiddie-Dudley-Carroll-Davis	34	1.25	1.23	1	3	3	50
10	Russell-Dinwiddie-Carroll-Kurucs-Davis	30	1.29	1.17	7	4	3	57
11	Napier-Russell-Graham-Carroll-Davis	27	.98	.96	1	2	2	50
12	Napier-Russell-Crabbe-Carroll-Davis	24	1.19	1.04	3	3	1	75
13	Napier-Russell-Carroll-Kurucs-Davis	23	1.34	.96	12	3	3	50
14	Dinwiddie-Harris-LeVert-Dudley-Davis	22	1.22	1.27	5	6	2	75
15	Dinwiddie-Crabbe-LeVert-Carroll-Davis	22	1.13	.83	14	2	2	50
16	Napier-Russell-Dinwiddie-Carroll-Davis	22	1.39	.98	21	4	0	100
17	Napier-Crabbe-Hollis-Jefferson-Carroll-Davis	21	.80	.96	-7	1	1	50
18	Dinwiddie-Harris-Dudley-Carroll-Davis	21	1.59	1.15	10	5	4	55
19	Dinwiddie-Crabbe-Hollis-Jefferson-Carroll-Davis	21	1.40	.93	22	4	1	80
20	Russell-LeVert-Dudley-Carroll-Davis	20	1.09	.95	6	3	2	60

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Russell-Dinwiddie-Dudley-Carroll-Davis .440 .450 +1 27% 36%   50% +2%

2 Napier-Russell-Dudley-Carroll-Davis .400 .390 +2 36% 33%   59% -5%

3 Russell-Dudley-Carroll-Kurucs-Davis .440 .380 +7 25% 35%   53% +1%

4 Napier-Russell-Hollis-Jefferson-Carroll-Davis .510 .390 +29 44% 29%   57% -3%

5 Napier-Dinwiddie-Harris-Crabbe-Davis .510 .510 -8 40% 35%   56% -4%

6 Napier-Dinwiddie-Crabbe-Hollis-Jefferson-Davis .360 .400 -2 38% 32%   48% +1%

7 Dinwiddie-LeVert-Dudley-Carroll-Davis .340 .530 +1 36% 35%   56% -1%

8 Napier-Dinwiddie-Hollis-Jefferson-Carroll-Davis .420 .400 +14 27% 22%   55% -9%

9 Napier-Dinwiddie-Dudley-Carroll-Davis .520 .530 -3 39% 25%   56% -2%

10 Russell-Dinwiddie-Carroll-Kurucs-Davis .500 .510 -2 40% 31%   53% +5%

11 Napier-Russell-Graham-Carroll-Davis .330 .430 +6 20% 33%   58% -5%

12 Napier-Russell-Crabbe-Carroll-Davis .510 .460 -5 21% 39%   47% -5%

13 Napier-Russell-Carroll-Kurucs-Davis .540 .370 -10 35% 26%   54% +4%

14 Dinwiddie-Harris-LeVert-Dudley-Davis .480 .460 0 35% 15%   55% -6%

15 Dinwiddie-Crabbe-LeVert-Carroll-Davis .400 .310 +17 26% 15%   53% +2%

16 Napier-Russell-Dinwiddie-Carroll-Davis .510 .500 +5 27% 50%   49% +17%

17 Napier-Crabbe-Hollis-Jefferson-Carroll-Davis .310 .410 -6 37% 24%   57% -4%

18 Dinwiddie-Harris-Dudley-Carroll-Davis .640 .490 -1 42% 40%   50% +1%

19 Dinwiddie-Crabbe-Hollis-Jefferson-Carroll-Davis .430 .390 +3 41% 45%   62% +13%

20 Russell-LeVert-Dudley-Carroll-Davis .380 .420 +16 29% 53%   49% -7%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C	36%	+94	108.4	105.2	3.2	42	36	53%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF
C	10.2	.616	5.5	72%	23.4	2.1	2.2	1.1	7.6	15.9	21.1

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF

C 16.8 .527 7.7 46% 15.9 4.1 2.9 2.6 5.6 23.6 22.7

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF

C -6.6 .089 -2.3 26% 7.4 -2.1 .7 -1.4 -2.0 -7.7 -1.6

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
0%	-5	0.0	496.6	%-496.6	0	1	0.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 99.3 99.3 1.000 .000 0% 0% 0.0 0.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	99.3	0.0	1	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	%-198.6	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	0	0.0%	0.0%	1	0	100.0%	0.0%	100.0	0.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	%-297.4

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1424	2504	36%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	109.9	112.0	-2.1
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	105.7	114.0	-8.3
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+4.2	-2.0	+6.2
Points Scored	3218	5986	-2768
Points Allowed	3123	6087	-2964
Net Points	+95	-101	+196
Effective FG%	50.0%	53.1%	-3.0%
Effective FG% Allowed	48.7%	52.6%	-3.8%
Assisted Field Goals	53%	62%	-9%
Assisted FG% Allowed	57%	55%	+2%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Shots Blocked	3%	5%	-2%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	29.1%	26.1%	+3.0%
Defensive Rebounding	75.8%	71.9%	+3.9%
Total Rebounding	52.5%	49.0%	+3.5%
Stats
Free Throws Made	19	18	+1
Free Throws Attempted	26	25	+1
Free Throws Made by Opp.	18	17	-1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	24	22	-2
Turnovers, on Offense	14	15	+1
Turnovers, on Defense	13	13	+0
Net Turnovers	-1	-2	-1
Fouls Committed	23	20	-3
Fouls, Drawn	22	22	+0
Net Fouls	-1	2	+3

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts