Alec Burks of the Utah Jazz, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Alec Burks
Utah Jazz
2017-2018 NBA Season

More Alec Burks stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
26%	-11	1.09	1.09	-0.5	25	35	41.7

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.7 6.5 .411 .467 49% 6% 1.7 7.7

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 69% .440   43% 2% 3.9

Close 27% .455   54% 15% 1.6

Dunk 5% .947   72% 5% .6

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 31% .527   59% 13% 2.1

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 40% .542   50% 7% 2.8

11-15 21% .359   48% 6% 1.0

16-20 23% .489   59% 5% 1.5

21+ 17% .391   33% 4% .8

Crunch 40% .448   49% 5% 2.3

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
107	124	86.3	5.8	5.0	471	57	12.1%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
26	12	20	9	67	19	3.5	3.5	3.1

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
19	1007	1.9%	22.1%	173	1009	17.1%	77.5%	19.0	99.6

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
4	4		%	1%	%	8	.4	.4%	27	.30	.9

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
9	19	32		11.0

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Rubio-Burks-Hood-Johnson-Udoh	41	.84	1.16	-27	1	6	14
2	Mitchell-Burks-Ingles-Jerebko-Favors	38	1.31	1.07	14	5	5	50
3	Neto-Burks-Hood-Sefolosha-Udoh	36	1.40	.94	32	3	1	75
4	Neto-Burks-O'Neale-Johnson-Favors	32	.86	1.13	-18	2	4	33
5	Rubio-Burks-Hood-Sefolosha-Udoh	31	1.25	.79	26	8	2	80
6	Neto-Burks-O'Neale-Jerebko-Udoh	28	1.22	.97	13	5	3	62
7	Mitchell-Burks-Ingles-Jerebko-Gobert	26	1.27	1.02	9	5	4	55
8	Mitchell-Burks-Hood-Ingles-Favors	25	1.02	.88	9	2	2	50
9	Rubio-Burks-Ingles-Favors-Gobert	17	1.24	1.00	6	3	1	75
10	Mitchell-Burks-Hood-Sefolosha-Udoh	17	1.00	1.18	-4	3	4	42
11	Mitchell-Burks-Hood-Johnson-Udoh	13	.97	1.00	-2	3	4	42
12	Mitchell-Burks-Johnson-Sefolosha-Udoh	13	1.36	.81	13	3	1	75
13	Mitchell-Burks-Hood-Sefolosha-Favors	13	1.50	1.11	9	4	1	80
14	Rubio-Burks-O'Neale-Johnson-Favors	12	1.21	.75	13	2	0	100
15	Mitchell-Burks-Sefolosha-Ingles-Favors	12	1.20	1.21	-4	2	3	40
16	Mitchell-Burks-O'Neale-Jerebko-Favors	12	1.25	1.35	-1	4	4	50
17	Rubio-Burks-O'Neale-Sefolosha-Gobert	11	.96	1.09	-3	1	2	33
18	Mitchell-Burks-Sefolosha-Ingles-Gobert	10	1.09	1.71	-12	1	3	25
19	Rubio-Burks-Hood-Sefolosha-Favors	10	1.24	.95	8	2	1	66
20	Neto-Burks-O'Neale-Jerebko-Favors	10	.65	1.00	-7	1	3	25

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Rubio-Burks-Hood-Johnson-Udoh .350 .480 -6 26% 37%   45% +2%

2 Mitchell-Burks-Ingles-Jerebko-Favors .510 .480 +5 45% 50%   53% +5%

3 Neto-Burks-Hood-Sefolosha-Udoh .540 .440 -6 31% 37%   50% +13%

4 Neto-Burks-O'Neale-Johnson-Favors .400 .490 -1 25% 39%   42% 0%

5 Rubio-Burks-Hood-Sefolosha-Udoh .420 .350 +9 29% 33%   49% +19%

6 Neto-Burks-O'Neale-Jerebko-Udoh .540 .400 +12 46% 36%   44% +2%

7 Mitchell-Burks-Ingles-Jerebko-Gobert .450 .450 +4 47% 32%   55% +11%

8 Mitchell-Burks-Hood-Ingles-Favors .470 .290 -6 51% 42%   47% -9%

9 Rubio-Burks-Ingles-Favors-Gobert .640 .500 +2 32% 37%   60% -10%

10 Mitchell-Burks-Hood-Sefolosha-Udoh .340 .560 -1 23% 44%   54% +10%

11 Mitchell-Burks-Hood-Johnson-Udoh .360 .320 -4 32% 32%   37% +3%

12 Mitchell-Burks-Johnson-Sefolosha-Udoh .520 .420 +4 36% 42%   54% +26%

13 Mitchell-Burks-Hood-Sefolosha-Favors .640 .520 0 48% 39%   53% +7%

14 Rubio-Burks-O'Neale-Johnson-Favors .630 .300 -3 46% 26%   48% +7%

15 Mitchell-Burks-Sefolosha-Ingles-Favors .390 .550 -2 43% 45%   63% +9%

16 Mitchell-Burks-O'Neale-Jerebko-Favors .520 .650 -4 24% 24%   73% +1%

17 Rubio-Burks-O'Neale-Sefolosha-Gobert .420 .430 -2 42% 43%   42% -4%

18 Mitchell-Burks-Sefolosha-Ingles-Gobert .500 .650 -9 55% 41%   28% +1%

19 Rubio-Burks-Hood-Sefolosha-Favors .530 .470 +3 32% 41%   57% +2%

20 Neto-Burks-O'Neale-Jerebko-Favors .250 .410 -2 25% 24%   54% 0%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	1%	-9	102.3	110.2	-7.9	3	8	27%
SG	23%	-12	104.0	104.5	-.6	26	34	43%
SF	2%	+8	118.3	112.8	5.5	18	10	64%
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	24.5	.482	10.5	32%	10.5	4.4	5.2	.9	1.7	32.3	24.2
SG	18.9	.469	5.4	29%	8.9	3.1	2.7	.3	3.6	22.4	14.8
SF	19.0	.435	6.1	51%	8.0	2.5	1.8	.6	3.7	22.7	14.1
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 18.4   .738   3.5   33% 2.6   7.0   .9   .0   .9   30.6   34.1

SG 15.6   .512   3.7   27% 6.7   4.8   2.5   .5   4.2   19.1   15.1

SF 17.8   .552   2.5   34% 6.1   1.8   1.2   .0   6.1   22.1   14.9

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 6.1 -.256 7.0 -1% 7.9 -2.6 -4.4 .9 -.9 1.7 -9.9

SG 3.4 -.043 1.8 2% 2.2 -1.7 -.3 -.2 .6 3.3 -.3

SF 1.2 -.116 3.7 17% 1.8 .6 -.6 .6 2.5 .6 -.8

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
14%	-8	106.8	131.2	-24.4	2	3	40.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 6.1 18.3 .333 .333 0% 17% 6.1 18.3

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 50% .000   0% 33% 0.0

Close 50% .667   0% 0% 0.8

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 50% .667   0% 0% 0.8

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 17% .000   0% 100% 0.0

11-15 17% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 33% .500   0% 0% 0.4

21+ 33% .500   0% 0% 0.4

Crunch 67% .500   0% 0% 0.8

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	2	100.0	6.1	6.1	7	1	14.3%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	-6.1	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	14	0.0%	14.3%	4	17	23.5%	70.6%	23.5	84.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-5.7

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1034	2827	26%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	109.7	109.8	-0.1
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	109.2	103.5	+5.7
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+0.5	+6.3	-5.8
Points Scored	2261	6279	-4018
Points Allowed	2272	5915	-3643
Net Points	-11	+364	-375
Effective FG%	52.4%	52.8%	-0.5%
Effective FG% Allowed	52.4%	50.0%	+2.4%
Assisted Field Goals	53%	60%	-7%
Assisted FG% Allowed	54%	53%	+1%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Shots Blocked	5%	6%	-1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	22.1%	25.4%	-3.2%
Defensive Rebounding	77.5%	76.4%	+1.1%
Total Rebounding	49.8%	50.9%	-1.1%
Stats
Free Throws Made	18	16	+2
Free Throws Attempted	23	21	+2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	17	15	-2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	22	20	-2
Turnovers, on Offense	13	15	+2
Turnovers, on Defense	14	15	-1
Net Turnovers	1	0	-1
Fouls Committed	19	20	+1
Fouls, Drawn	22	20	+2
Net Fouls	3	0	-3

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts