Elfrid Payton of the Phoenix Suns, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Elfrid Payton
Phoenix Suns
2017-2018 NBA Season

More Elfrid Payton stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
13%	-254	0.99	1.2	-22.6	1	18	5.3

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 4.8 11.0 .435 .447 18% 11% 1.9 11.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 53% .374   15% 5% 4.4

Close 45% .511   19% 20% 5.1

Dunk 2% 1.000   25% 0% .4

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 47% .531   19% 19% 5.5

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 45% .505   24% 17% 5.0

11-15 28% .466   15% 9% 2.8

16-20 18% .351   8% 5% 1.4

21+ 10% .300   0% 5% .6

Crunch 27% .333   5% 5% 2.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
37	54	68.5	4.8	3.3	238	29	12.2%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
39	18	44	17	118	32	3.7	13.2	10.5

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
17	618	2.8%	22.3%	83	575	14.4%	72.3%	17.2	94.7

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
4	2		1%	1%	%	6	.5	.6%	19	.32	1.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
3	32	19		25.3

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Payton-Booker-Warren-Bender-Len	68	1.15	1.14	5	4	2	66
2	Payton-Daniels-Jackson-Chriss-Bender	41	.88	1.18	-27	1	7	12
3	Payton-Daniels-Jackson-Bender-Len	28	.79	1.21	-26	1	7	12
4	Payton-Booker-Warren-Bender-Chandler	27	1.14	1.41	-16	0	2	0
5	Payton-Jackson-Warren-Chriss-Bender	27	1.08	1.07	3	3	3	50
6	Payton-Booker-Jackson-Warren-Bender	21	.84	1.37	-25	1	3	25
7	Payton-Daniels-Jackson-Warren-Bender	19	1.26	1.31	-2	1	2	33
8	Payton-Daniels-Warren-Bender-Len	17	1.03	1.28	-10	1	3	25
9	Payton-Booker-Jackson-Warren-Len	14	1.06	1.35	-13	0	4	0
10	Payton-Booker-Jackson-Bender-Len	13	1.03	.69	8	2	0	100
11	Payton-Daniels-Booker-Warren-Len	11	1.03	1.29	-5	1	2	33
12	Payton-Jackson-Warren-Bender-Chandler	10	.88	1.16	-8	0	1	0
13	Payton-Booker-Warren-Chriss-Bender	10	.91	1.00	-2	1	2	33
14	Payton-Harrison-Daniels-Bender-Chandler	9	1.00	1.30	-7	0	1	0
15	Payton-Booker-Jackson-Chriss-Len	8	.79	.71	3	2	0	100
16	Payton-Daniels-Jackson-Chriss-Len	8	1.13	1.20	0	2	1	66
17	Payton-Daniels-Booker-Jackson-Warren	7	.73	1.29	-7	1	2	33
18	Payton-Booker-Jackson-Bender-Chandler	7	1.06	1.00	2	1	0	100
19	Payton-Reed-Jackson-Chriss-Bender	7	.62	.93	-5	1	1	50
20	Payton-Jackson-Warren-Chriss-Len	6	.75	1.60	-12	1	4	20

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Payton-Booker-Warren-Bender-Len .500 .500 +3 35% 41%   55% -6%

2 Payton-Daniels-Jackson-Chriss-Bender .360 .550 -3 26% 49%   52% -2%

3 Payton-Daniels-Jackson-Bender-Len .440 .420 -3 33% 33%   43% -19%

4 Payton-Booker-Warren-Bender-Chandler .540 .580 -1 31% 26%   40% 0%

5 Payton-Jackson-Warren-Chriss-Bender .530 .390 -10 53% 43%   46% -3%

6 Payton-Booker-Jackson-Warren-Bender .360 .460 -4 44% 48%   42% -2%

7 Payton-Daniels-Jackson-Warren-Bender .530 .530 -4 40% 50%   52% -3%

8 Payton-Daniels-Warren-Bender-Len .400 .460 -2 29% 30%   45% +5%

9 Payton-Booker-Jackson-Warren-Len .450 .460 +4 35% 43%   40% -11%

10 Payton-Booker-Jackson-Bender-Len .440 .350 +7 35% 19%   48% +11%

11 Payton-Daniels-Booker-Warren-Len .390 .630 +3 35% 32%   48% +4%

12 Payton-Jackson-Warren-Bender-Chandler .350 .550 +1 31% 32%   67% -4%

13 Payton-Booker-Warren-Chriss-Bender .430 .370 -7 33% 32%   50% -4%

14 Payton-Harrison-Daniels-Bender-Chandler .570 .650 +2 57% 24%   50% -6%

15 Payton-Booker-Jackson-Chriss-Len .400 .270 -2 20% 20%   46% -10%

16 Payton-Daniels-Jackson-Chriss-Len .500 .530 +6 25% 33%   36% +8%

17 Payton-Daniels-Booker-Jackson-Warren .330 .400 -5 47% 40%   45% -13%

18 Payton-Booker-Jackson-Bender-Chandler .460 .500 +2 8% 36%   43% +2%

19 Payton-Reed-Jackson-Chriss-Bender .210 .310 -1 29% 0%   47% +14%

20 Payton-Jackson-Warren-Chriss-Len .310 .690 +4 23% 38%   70% -19%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	13%	-241	102.3	124.1	-21.8	1	18	5%
SG	0%	-15	80.4	136.8	-56.3	1	2	33%
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	18.7	.449	4.8	46%	9.0	10.6	4.8	.5	4.4	20.2	15.5
SG	12.1	.333	4.0	66%	4.0	4.0	4.0	.0	8.0	8.0	.0
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 19.7 .537 3.7 29% 7.2 10.1 3.4 .4 2.9 24.2 21.6

SG 16.1 .875 .0 0% 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 28.2 32.5

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG -1.0 -.088 1.1 17% 1.8 .5 -1.5 .2 -1.5 -4.1 -6.1

SG -4.0 -.542 4.0 66% .0 .0 .0 -4.0 -4.0 -20.1 -32.5

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
21%	-36	80.1	154.0	-73.9	1	6	14.3%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 6.2 16.4 .375 .375 0% 13% 12.3 24.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 50% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 50% .750   0% 25% 0.8

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 50% .750   0% 25% 0.8

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 63% .600   0% 20% 0.8

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 25% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 13% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 38% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
6	8	75.0	16.4	12.3	10	2	20.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	4	2	1	7	0	7.0	20.5	14.4

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
1	24	4.2%	16.7%	5	33	15.2%	51.5%	19.3	68.2

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	0	0	4%	0%	0%	1	2.1	1.7%	0	1.00	3.4

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	35.8

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	540	3325	13%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	99.4	106.1	-6.7
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	120.0	113.4	+6.6
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-20.7	-7.3	-13.3
Points Scored	1147	7375	-6228
Points Allowed	1401	7889	-6488
Net Points	-254	-514	+260
Effective FG%	47.8%	49.8%	-2.0%
Effective FG% Allowed	55.6%	52.8%	+2.8%
Assisted Field Goals	53%	55%	-2%
Assisted FG% Allowed	59%	55%	+4%
Own Shots Blocked	8%	6%	+2%
Shots Blocked	5%	4%	+1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	22.3%	26.9%	-4.6%
Defensive Rebounding	72.3%	73.9%	-1.6%
Total Rebounding	47.3%	50.4%	-3.1%
Stats
Free Throws Made	15	18	-3
Free Throws Attempted	22	24	-2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	18	19	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	24	25	+1
Turnovers, on Offense	15	16	+1
Turnovers, on Defense	13	13	+0
Net Turnovers	-2	-3	-1
Fouls Committed	23	22	-1
Fouls, Drawn	19	21	-2
Net Fouls	-4	-1	+3

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts