Dragen Bender of the Phoenix Suns, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Dragen Bender
Phoenix Suns
2017-2018 NBA Season

More Dragen Bender stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
52%	-475	1.03	1.14	-11.2	27	54	33.3

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.3 5.9 .386 .508 81% 5% .5 6.5

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 76% .522   91% 1% 4.7

Close 22% .425   49% 17% 1.1

Dunk 2% .900   100% 10% .2

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 24% .466   57% 16% 1.3

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 37% .475   76% 3% 2.1

11-15 30% .645   84% 5% 2.3

16-20 22% .438   83% 6% 1.1

21+ 11% .387   88% 11% .5

Crunch 33% .421   84% 8% 1.6

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
39	51	76.5	1.2	.9	505	21	4.2%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
39	42	35	14	130	49	2.7	2.6	3.1

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
40	2207	1.8%	24.2%	322	2132	15.1%	74.2%	16.9	98.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
8	43	2	%	4%	1%	53	1.3	1.4%	109	.49	3.9

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
9	49	54		7.9

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Ulis-Booker-Warren-Bender-Chandler	83	.91	1.14	-35	5	8	38
2	Payton-Booker-Warren-Bender-Len	68	1.15	1.14	5	4	2	66
3	Ulis-Daniels-Jackson-Bender-Len	66	1.06	1.22	-33	6	10	37
4	Ulis-Daniels-Jackson-Chriss-Bender	53	1.08	1.14	-10	4	5	44
5	Canaan-Daniels-House-Bender-Len	49	1.29	.98	30	4	2	66
6	Canaan-Daniels-Warren-Bender-Len	43	1.05	1.13	-7	4	6	40
7	Ulis-Booker-Jackson-Bender-Chandler	42	1.01	1.17	-18	2	5	28
8	James-Daniels-Jackson-Bender-Len	41	.94	1.06	-17	5	5	50
9	Payton-Daniels-Jackson-Chriss-Bender	41	.88	1.18	-27	1	7	12
10	James-Daniels-Warren-Bender-Len	35	1.01	1.10	-7	4	4	50
11	Ulis-Booker-Warren-Bender-Monroe	35	.97	1.16	-17	2	5	28
12	Ulis-Booker-Jackson-Bender-Len	34	.88	1.21	-22	5	8	38
13	Ulis-Jackson-Warren-Bender-Chandler	34	.88	1.06	-10	2	4	33
14	James-Booker-Warren-Bender-Chandler	33	1.38	1.11	27	5	3	62
15	Payton-Daniels-Jackson-Bender-Len	28	.79	1.21	-26	1	7	12
16	Payton-Booker-Warren-Bender-Chandler	27	1.14	1.41	-16	0	2	0
17	James-Booker-Jackson-Bender-Len	27	.99	1.24	-18	5	5	50
18	Payton-Jackson-Warren-Chriss-Bender	27	1.08	1.07	3	3	3	50
19	Booker-Jackson-Warren-Bender-Chandler	23	1.48	1.25	14	4	1	80
20	Ulis-Daniels-Warren-Bender-Len	23	1.10	.86	7	4	2	66

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Ulis-Booker-Warren-Bender-Chandler .440 .490 +1 33% 32%   45% -3%

2 Payton-Booker-Warren-Bender-Len .500 .500 +3 35% 41%   55% -6%

3 Ulis-Daniels-Jackson-Bender-Len .410 .490 -7 31% 32%   46% +4%

4 Ulis-Daniels-Jackson-Chriss-Bender .470 .460 -10 35% 41%   43% -2%

5 Canaan-Daniels-House-Bender-Len .490 .410 +9 40% 26%   51% -2%

6 Canaan-Daniels-Warren-Bender-Len .420 .460 -1 28% 39%   45% -2%

7 Ulis-Booker-Jackson-Bender-Chandler .430 .490 +13 32% 19%   57% -8%

8 James-Daniels-Jackson-Bender-Len .400 .440 -7 31% 30%   56% -10%

9 Payton-Daniels-Jackson-Chriss-Bender .360 .550 -3 26% 49%   52% -2%

10 James-Daniels-Warren-Bender-Len .440 .460 -6 32% 36%   52% 0%

11 Ulis-Booker-Warren-Bender-Monroe .480 .520 -17 43% 42%   54% -9%

12 Ulis-Booker-Jackson-Bender-Len .410 .480 -3 30% 40%   43% -3%

13 Ulis-Jackson-Warren-Bender-Chandler .380 .470 +7 39% 47%   50% +2%

14 James-Booker-Warren-Bender-Chandler .590 .520 +4 30% 39%   57% +3%

15 Payton-Daniels-Jackson-Bender-Len .440 .420 -3 33% 33%   43% -19%

16 Payton-Booker-Warren-Bender-Chandler .540 .580 -1 31% 26%   40% 0%

17 James-Booker-Jackson-Bender-Len .460 .530 -4 40% 48%   52% -17%

18 Payton-Jackson-Warren-Chriss-Bender .530 .390 -10 53% 43%   46% -3%

19 Booker-Jackson-Warren-Bender-Chandler .570 .420 -5 40% 20%   53% -10%

20 Ulis-Daniels-Warren-Bender-Len .480 .330 +3 45% 31%   49% +8%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	35%	-340	103.5	115.3	-11.8	23	54	29%
C	16%	-135	107.0	117.0	-10.0	21	29	42%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	11.3	.498	.7	20%	7.7	2.7	2.5	1.3	3.6	11.8	7.2
C	11.7	.528	2.2	30%	10.5	3.9	2.9	1.1	4.7	14.2	10.7

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 17.6 .565 4.5 34% 11.2 3.5 2.2 .9 3.6 23.4 19.1

C 19.4 .540 9.0 59% 15.7 4.4 3.3 2.9 5.0 27.8 25.5

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF -6.3 -.066 -3.8 -14% -3.5 -.8 -.3 .5 .0 -11.6 -11.9

C -7.6 -.012 -6.8 -29% -5.3 -.5 .4 -1.8 .4 -13.7 -14.9

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
40%	-15	95.4	111.4	-16.1	8	10	44.4%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 3.2 8.6 .375 .500 100% 13% 0.0 8.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 63% .800   100% 20% 0.4

Close 38% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 38% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 38% .500   100% 0% 0.1

11-15 25% .500   100% 0% 0.1

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 38% .500   100% 33% 0.1

Crunch 50% .375   50% 25% 0.1

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	1.1	0.0	8	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
2	0	2	1	5	5	1.0	0.0	5.4

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	52	0.0%	38.5%	7	56	12.5%	66.1%	12.5	104.5

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	5	3	0	1.3

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	2028	1836	52%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	103.6	106.8	-3.2
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	114.4	114.4	+0.0
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-10.8	-7.6	-3.2
Points Scored	4422	4100	+322
Points Allowed	4897	4393	+504
Net Points	-475	-293	-182
Effective FG%	49.5%	49.5%	+0.1%
Effective FG% Allowed	53.2%	53.3%	-0.1%
Assisted Field Goals	56%	53%	+3%
Assisted FG% Allowed	55%	55%	+0%
Own Shots Blocked	6%	7%	-1%
Shots Blocked	4%	5%	-1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	24.2%	28.6%	-4.4%
Defensive Rebounding	74.2%	73.2%	+1.0%
Total Rebounding	49.2%	50.9%	-1.7%
Stats
Free Throws Made	16	19	-3
Free Throws Attempted	22	26	-4
Free Throws Made by Opp.	18	19	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	23	26	+3
Turnovers, on Offense	16	16	+0
Turnovers, on Defense	13	14	-1
Net Turnovers	-3	-2	+1
Fouls Committed	21	23	+2
Fouls, Drawn	20	22	-2
Net Fouls	-1	-1	+0

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts