Danuel House of the Phoenix Suns, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Danuel House
Phoenix Suns
2017-2018 NBA Season

More Danuel House stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
10%	+19	1.1	1.08	2.3	12	11	52.2

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.4 5.6 .434 .492 61% 9% 1.1 6.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 57% .404   59% 3% 2.6

Close 29% .474   44% 26% 1.6

Dunk 14% .889   81% 0% 1.4

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 43% .607   62% 18% 3.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 47% .575   71% 3% 3.0

11-15 19% .360   63% 20% .8

16-20 19% .604   50% 13% 1.3

21+ 16% .275   20% 10% .5

Crunch 34% .455   41% 11% 1.7

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
25	31	80.6	3.8	3.1	145	16	11.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
11	3	6	5	25	4	6.3	4.6	3.1

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
13	404	3.2%	25.2%	63	432	14.6%	76.9%	17.8	102.1

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	5		%	3%	%	6	.7	.8%	10	.60	2.2

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	4	6		17.3

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Canaan-Daniels-House-Bender-Len	49	1.29	.98	30	4	2	66
2	Ulis-House-Jackson-Chriss-Bender	23	1.00	1.10	-7	2	2	50
3	Ulis-Harrison-House-Bender-Len	20	1.33	1.16	5	2	1	66
4	Ulis-House-Jackson-Peters-Chriss	17	1.23	.77	16	3	1	75
5	Ulis-Daniels-House-Bender-Len	15	1.06	1.30	-7	1	2	33
6	Harrison-House-Dudley-Peters-Bender	13	1.69	.86	24	1	0	100
7	James-Daniels-House-Bender-Len	11	1.52	1.00	13	1	0	100
8	Harrison-Reed-House-Dudley-Bender	11	1.16	.76	6	2	0	100
9	Ulis-House-Jackson-Chriss-Len	9	.77	1.32	-12	0	2	0
10	Ulis-Daniels-House-Chriss-Bender	9	.75	.53	5	2	0	100
11	James-Daniels-House-Bender-Monroe	8	.78	.89	-2	1	1	50
12	Ulis-House-Jackson-Bender-Williams	8	.80	.84	0	0	0	0
13	Ulis-Reed-House-Dudley-Len	6	.93	1.00	-1	1	1	50
14	Ulis-Harrison-House-Peters-Chriss	5	1.55	1.00	6	1	0	100
15	Ulis-Daniels-House-Dudley-Bender	5	1.11	.82	1	1	1	50
16	Ulis-Harrison-House-Peters-Len	5	.83	1.00	-2	1	1	50
17	Ulis-Harrison-House-Peters-Bender	5	1.43	1.15	5	1	0	100
18	Harrison-Reed-House-Bender-Len	5	1.10	1.11	1	1	0	100
19	Daniels-Booker-House-Dudley-Len	4	.40	1.09	-8	0	1	0
20	Gray-Reed-House-Jackson-Peters	4	1.27	.90	5	1	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Canaan-Daniels-House-Bender-Len .490 .410 +9 40% 26%   51% -2%

2 Ulis-House-Jackson-Chriss-Bender .420 .430 -2 33% 34%   58% -7%

3 Ulis-Harrison-House-Bender-Len .630 .470 -13 45% 29%   55% -10%

4 Ulis-House-Jackson-Peters-Chriss .500 .310 -4 38% 28%   66% -9%

5 Ulis-Daniels-House-Bender-Len .320 .680 +2 38% 28%   62% +10%

6 Harrison-House-Dudley-Peters-Bender .720 .350 +3 44% 24%   46% +4%

7 James-Daniels-House-Bender-Len .600 .380 +3 25% 29%   45% -4%

8 Harrison-Reed-House-Dudley-Bender .560 .360 +5 50% 32%   43% +9%

9 Ulis-House-Jackson-Chriss-Len .270 .550 +3 27% 40%   58% -23%

10 Ulis-Daniels-House-Chriss-Bender .250 .250 -2 19% 42%   71% -14%

11 James-Daniels-House-Bender-Monroe .330 .460 0 27% 15%   54% +6%

12 Ulis-House-Jackson-Bender-Williams .330 .440 +2 50% 31%   51% +6%

13 Ulis-Reed-House-Dudley-Len .500 .460 0 40% 31%   52% -21%

14 Ulis-Harrison-House-Peters-Chriss .550 .500 0 45% 38%   48% +18%

15 Ulis-Daniels-House-Dudley-Bender .500 .300 -2 38% 30%   43% -2%

16 Ulis-Harrison-House-Peters-Len .380 .400 +2 38% 10%   47% -8%

17 Ulis-Harrison-House-Peters-Bender .620 .500 +1 46% 25%   60% 0%

18 Harrison-Reed-House-Bender-Len .500 .380 -2 25% 50%   43% -9%

19 Daniels-Booker-House-Dudley-Len .220 .440 -3 22% 22%   57% -11%

20 Gray-Reed-House-Jackson-Peters .440 .570 +2 33% 71%   50% +20%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	0%	0	.0	.0	.0			0%
SG	2%	+3	110.6	108.9	1.7	7	7	50%
SF	7%	+15	109.1	106.6	2.6	9	9	50%
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	.0	.000	.0	0%	.0	.0	.0	.0	.0	.0	.0
SG	14.8	.557	1.7	31%	9.7	2.1	1.3	.8	3.0	17.3	13.8
SF	16.2	.468	4.6	47%	9.1	3.4	1.4	.7	2.8	19.1	14.8
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG .0   .000   .0   0% .0   .0   .0   .0   .0   .0   .0

SG 19.4   .533   7.2   23% 7.2   4.6   1.3   .0   4.2   26.2   19.3

SF 15.0   .506   3.1   26% 9.3   5.3   1.4   1.9   3.6   17.0   15.8

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG .0 .000 .0 0% .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

SG -4.6 .025 -5.5 8% 2.5 -2.5 .0 .8 1.3 -8.9 -5.5

SF 1.2 -.038 1.5 21% -.2 -1.9 .0 -1.2 .9 2.1 -1.0

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
5%	+5	134.6	97.2	37.4	2	1	66.7%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 7.5 7.5 1.000 .000 0% 0% 15.0 15.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 100% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 100% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	2	100.0	15.0	15.0	1	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	%-15.0	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	5	0.0%	60.0%	1	8	12.5%	75.0%	12.5	135.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	1	0	-21.9

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	392	3472	10%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	109.6	104.6	+4.9
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	107.9	115.1	-7.2
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+1.7	-10.5	+12.1
Points Scored	897	7625	-6728
Points Allowed	878	8412	-7534
Net Points	+19	-787	+806
Effective FG%	52.3%	49.2%	+3.1%
Effective FG% Allowed	50.1%	53.6%	-3.5%
Assisted Field Goals	61%	54%	+7%
Assisted FG% Allowed	60%	55%	+5%
Own Shots Blocked	7%	6%	+1%
Shots Blocked	3%	5%	-2%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	25.2%	26.4%	-1.1%
Defensive Rebounding	76.9%	73.3%	+3.5%
Total Rebounding	51.0%	49.9%	+1.2%
Stats
Free Throws Made	18	18	+0
Free Throws Attempted	22	24	-2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	16	19	+3
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	22	25	+3
Turnovers, on Offense	15	16	+1
Turnovers, on Defense	12	13	-1
Net Turnovers	-3	-3	+0
Fouls Committed	18	22	+4
Fouls, Drawn	18	21	-3
Net Fouls	0	-1	-1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts