Jon Leuer of the Detroit Pistons, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Jon Leuer
Detroit Pistons
2017-2018 NBA Season

More Jon Leuer stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
3%	+12	1.03	1	4.3	4	4	50.0

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 1.9 4.5 .417 .417 87% 8% 1.6 5.4

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 56% .300   67% 0% 1.5

Close 42% .533   100% 20% 2.0

Dunk 3% 1.000   100% 0% .3

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 44% .563   100% 19% 2.3

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 61% .500   91% 5% 2.8

11-15 19% .286   50% 14% .5

16-20 17% .333   100% 17% .5

21+ 3% .000   0% 0% .0

Crunch 19% .286   67% 14% .5

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
13	15	86.7	5.4	4.6	45	9	20.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
	1	2	2	5	1	5.0	3.9	1.8

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
7	138	5.1%	17.4%	25	138	18.1%	77.5%	23.2	94.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	2		1%	3%	%	3	1.1	1.3%	9	.33	3.1

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
2	1	5		9.1

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Smith-Galloway-Johnson-Leuer-Ellenson	14	.58	.69	-4	0	1	0
2	Jackson-Bradley-Johnson-Harris-Leuer	13	1.24	1.00	7	2	1	66
3	Smith-Galloway-Kennard-Leuer-Moreland	8	1.06	1.24	-3	0	1	0
4	Jackson-Bradley-Harris-Leuer-Drummond	8	1.28	1.50	-1	0	1	0
5	Smith-Galloway-Harris-Leuer-Ellenson	7	1.13	.59	7	2	0	100
6	Smith-Galloway-Bullock-Leuer-Ellenson	6	.64	1.71	-15	0	2	0
7	Smith-Galloway-Harris-Leuer-Moreland	5	.77	1.00	-1	0	1	0
8	Smith-Bradley-Johnson-Leuer-Ellenson	4	1.00	.75	5	1	0	100
9	Smith-Kennard-Johnson-Leuer-Drummond	4	.75	1.60	-7	0	2	0
10	Jackson-Galloway-Bullock-Tolliver-Leuer	4	1.11	.50	5	1	0	100
11	Smith-Kennard-Johnson-Tolliver-Leuer	4	1.14	1.57	-3	1	1	50
12	Smith-Johnson-Harris-Leuer-Drummond	4	1.83	1.71	-1	0	1	0
13	Jackson-Galloway-Johnson-Leuer-Ellenson	3	1.43	.57	6	1	0	100
14	Smith-Bradley-Kennard-Tolliver-Leuer	3	1.00	.50	3	1	0	100
15	Jackson-Bradley-Kennard-Leuer-Drummond	3	1.14	1.00	2	1	0	100
16	Smith-Bradley-Johnson-Harris-Leuer	2	1.13	.75	3	1	1	50
17	Smith-Bradley-Bullock-Leuer-Ellenson	2	.63	.63	0	0	0	0
18	Smith-Bradley-Harris-Leuer-Drummond	2	.83	.80	1	1	1	50
19	Smith-Kennard-Harris-Leuer-Drummond	2	.40	1.40	-5	0	1	0
20	Smith-Kennard-Johnson-Harris-Leuer	2	1.20	.80	2	1	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Smith-Galloway-Johnson-Leuer-Ellenson .270 .260 -5 19% 30%   39% +2%

2 Jackson-Bradley-Johnson-Harris-Leuer .540 .350 -2 42% 35%   44% +7%

3 Smith-Galloway-Kennard-Leuer-Moreland .670 .570 -2 17% 29%   60% -24%

4 Jackson-Bradley-Harris-Leuer-Drummond .560 .830 +2 50% 42%   67% +2%

5 Smith-Galloway-Harris-Leuer-Ellenson .470 .240 -2 40% 29%   59% -13%

6 Smith-Galloway-Bullock-Leuer-Ellenson .250 .770 +2 33% 62%   44% -7%

7 Smith-Galloway-Harris-Leuer-Moreland .460 .500 -1 9% 50%   40% +12%

8 Smith-Bradley-Johnson-Leuer-Ellenson .500 .440 +2 13% 44%   54% -10%

9 Smith-Kennard-Johnson-Leuer-Drummond .400 .830 -2 30% 50%   58% +4%

10 Jackson-Galloway-Bullock-Tolliver-Leuer .400 .400 -1 30% 0%   42% +50%

11 Smith-Kennard-Johnson-Tolliver-Leuer .570 .330 -3 43% 22%   25% 0%

12 Smith-Johnson-Harris-Leuer-Drummond .670 .830 +3 33% 33%   83% -2%

13 Jackson-Galloway-Johnson-Leuer-Ellenson .570 .220 0 14% 33%   29% +14%

14 Smith-Bradley-Kennard-Tolliver-Leuer .400 .400 +2 60% 80%   50% +23%

15 Jackson-Bradley-Kennard-Leuer-Drummond .500 .600 +2 67% 80%   67% +2%

16 Smith-Bradley-Johnson-Harris-Leuer .440 .330 -1 44% 33%   58% +13%

17 Smith-Bradley-Bullock-Leuer-Ellenson .330 .330 0 17% 33%   50% 0%

18 Smith-Bradley-Harris-Leuer-Drummond .330 0 -5 50% 0%   38% 0%

19 Smith-Kennard-Harris-Leuer-Drummond .250 .500 -1 50% 17%   50% -40%

20 Smith-Kennard-Johnson-Harris-Leuer .500 .250 -2 50% 50%   50% +20%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	2%	-16	99.2	107.8	-8.6	2	5	28%
C	1%	+28	113.7	83.7	30.0	4	1	80%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	11.3	.381	4.8	33%	9.7	2.7	3.2	.5	5.4	12.9	6.9
C	16.1	.467	6.4	60%	15.0	.0	2.1	2.1	6.4	20.4	15.8

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 17.7 .742 4.3 33% 4.8 3.2 .0 1.6 1.6 29.5 29.0

C 13.9 .385 9.7 53% 20.4 2.1 2.1 1.1 6.4 18.2 20.1

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF -6.4 -.361 .5 0% 4.8 -.5 -3.2 -1.1 -3.8 -16.6 -22.1

C 2.1 .082 -3.2 7% -5.4 -2.1 .0 1.1 .0 2.1 -4.3

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
3%	-4	85.3	123.2	-37.9	0	1	0.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 9.5 9.5 1.000 .000 0% 100% 0.0 0.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 100% .000   0% 100% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 100% .000   0% 100% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 100% .000   0% 100% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 50% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	9.5	0.0	1	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	%-18.9	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	5	0.0%	20.0%	0	3	0.0%	100.0%	0.0	120.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	0	0	33%	0%	0%	1	9.5	14.3%	2	0.50	21.4

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-27.9

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	134	3743	3%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	101.2	109.0	-7.8
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	100.4	108.8	-8.4
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+0.8	+0.2	+0.6
Points Scored	291	8218	-7927
Points Allowed	279	8242	-7963
Net Points	+12	-24	+36
Effective FG%	50.6%	51.2%	-0.6%
Effective FG% Allowed	47.0%	52.6%	-5.6%
Assisted Field Goals	51%	58%	-7%
Assisted FG% Allowed	63%	64%	-1%
Own Shots Blocked	4%	5%	-1%
Shots Blocked	2%	4%	-2%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	17.4%	26.1%	-8.7%
Defensive Rebounding	77.5%	75.1%	+2.4%
Total Rebounding	47.5%	50.6%	-3.1%
Stats
Free Throws Made	14	14	+0
Free Throws Attempted	19	20	-1
Free Throws Made by Opp.	21	14	-7
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	25	18	-7
Turnovers, on Offense	15	13	-2
Turnovers, on Defense	16	14	+2
Net Turnovers	1	1	+0
Fouls Committed	21	18	-3
Fouls, Drawn	19	18	+1
Net Fouls	-2	0	+2

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts