free NBA basketball picks
Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

New York Knicks
2017-2018 NBA Season Stats
Knicks home page

Floor Time stats | 5-Man Units | Team Stats | W-L Profiles | By Position

Top Five-Man Floor Units
#
Unit
Min
Off
Def
+/-
W
L
Win%
1
 Jack-Lee-Thomas-Porzingis-Kanter 277.1  1.12  1.15  -20   7   11  
38.8
2
 Jack-Lee-HardawayJr.-Porzingis-Kanter 249.7  1.17  1.10  +36   10   7  
58.8
3
 Ntilikina-Baker-McDermott-Beasley-O'Quinn 113.6  1.15  1.11  +13   9   5  
64.2
4
 Ntilikina-Lee-McDermott-Beasley-O'Quinn 64.3  1.14  1.07  +15   10   7  
58.8
5
 Jack-Lee-HardawayJr.-Porzingis-O'Quinn 51.6  1.17  1.30  -6   4   5  
44.4
6
 Ntilikina-Lee-Thomas-McDermott-O'Quinn 47.2  1.06  1.00  +3   4   4  
50.0
7
 Jack-Lee-McDermott-Porzingis-Kanter 46.8  1.01  0.92  +6   6   9  
40.0
8
 Sessions-Lee-HardawayJr.-Porzingis-Kanter 46.3  0.82  1.04  -17   0   3  
0.0
9
 Jack-Lee-Thomas-Beasley-Kanter 34.7  1.03  1.20  -13   2   3  
40.0
10
 Ntilikina-Lee-McDermott-Porzingis-O'Quinn 31.1  1.16  1.22  -7   5   8  
38.4
11
 Ntilikina-HardawayJr.-McDermott-Porzingis-O'Quinn 28.5  1.06  0.81  +15   6   3  
66.6
12
 Jack-Lee-HardawayJr.-Beasley-Kanter 28.0  1.07  1.15  -5   1   3  
25.0
13
 Ntilikina-Baker-McDermott-Porzingis-O'Quinn 27.4  0.93  0.84  +5   3   3  
50.0
14
 Ntilikina-HardawayJr.-Thomas-McDermott-O'Quinn 25.6  1.09  1.12  +1   4   4  
50.0
15
 Jack-Lee-McDermott-Beasley-Kanter 25.5  1.18  1.25  +0   4   3  
57.1
16
 Jack-Lee-Beasley-Porzingis-Kanter 22.7  1.12  1.32  -11   1   4  
20.0
17
 Ntilikina-Lee-McDermott-Porzingis-Kanter 21.8  1.07  1.00  +4   5   4  
55.5
18
 Jack-HardawayJr.-McDermott-Porzingis-Kanter 20.0  0.98  1.17  -11   3   6  
33.3
19
 Jack-HardawayJr.-Thomas-Porzingis-Kanter 18.6  1.25  0.93  +13   4   0  
100
20
 Ntilikina-Dotson-McDermott-Beasley-O'Quinn 18.5  1.32  1.08  +9   3   2  
60.0


Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details
#
Unit
eFG
eFGA
FTA
Close
dClose
Reb
T/O
1
 Jack-Lee-Thomas-Porzingis-Kanter .500  .480  -24  32%  35%   53.5%  -4% 
2
 Jack-Lee-HardawayJr.-Porzingis-Kanter .480  .450  -5  28%  34%   50.5%  +3% 
3
 Ntilikina-Baker-McDermott-Beasley-O'Quinn .500  .420  -3  34%  28%   46.0%  +3% 
4
 Ntilikina-Lee-McDermott-Beasley-O'Quinn .500  .430  -9  36%  36%   50.5%  -2% 
5
 Jack-Lee-HardawayJr.-Porzingis-O'Quinn .520  .520  +2  17%  32%   46.5%  -3% 
6
 Ntilikina-Lee-Thomas-McDermott-O'Quinn .440  .420  +2  30%  25%   49.5%  +4% 
7
 Jack-Lee-McDermott-Porzingis-Kanter .420  .380  +1  25%  32%   51.0%  +4% 
8
 Sessions-Lee-HardawayJr.-Porzingis-Kanter .360  .420  +5  40%  36%   46.5%  -2% 
9
 Jack-Lee-Thomas-Beasley-Kanter .510  .500  +8  27%  37%   43.0%  -8% 
10
 Ntilikina-Lee-McDermott-Porzingis-O'Quinn .530  .410  -12  24%  25%   45.0%  -4% 
11
 Ntilikina-HardawayJr.-McDermott-Porzingis-O'Quinn .400  .290  -2  38%  33%   48.5%  -3% 
12
 Jack-Lee-HardawayJr.-Beasley-Kanter .520  .490  +3  39%  42%   50.0%  -10% 
13
 Ntilikina-Baker-McDermott-Porzingis-O'Quinn .370  .320  +6  24%  36%   50.5%  +9% 
14
 Ntilikina-HardawayJr.-Thomas-McDermott-O'Quinn .480  .470  37%  29%   60.5%  +3% 
15
 Jack-Lee-McDermott-Beasley-Kanter .560  .540  +6  37%  46%   53.5%  -13% 
16
 Jack-Lee-Beasley-Porzingis-Kanter .430  .510  -3  38%  22%   69.0%  -10% 
17
 Ntilikina-Lee-McDermott-Porzingis-Kanter .460  .420  +3  40%  33%   50.5%  -2% 
18
 Jack-HardawayJr.-McDermott-Porzingis-Kanter .410  .540  -8  36%  36%   61.5%  -9% 
19
 Jack-HardawayJr.-Thomas-Porzingis-Kanter .630  .420  -3  19%  39%   57.5%  -8% 
20
 Ntilikina-Dotson-McDermott-Beasley-O'Quinn .510  .470  +1  29%  29%   69.5%  -11% 

    Legend:
  • Min = the total minutes the unit was on the floor.

  • Off = the unit's points per possession.

  • Def = the unit's points per possession allowed.

  • +/- = the team net points for the unit.

  • W = number of games a unit outscored its opponents while on the court.

  • L = number of games a unit was outscored by its opponents while on the court.

  • Win% = the winning percentage for the unit based on Wins versus Losses.
  • eFG = the effective shooting percentage, adjusted for the value of 3-point shots.
  • eFGA = the effective shooting percentage allowed to opponents.
  • FTA = net free throw attempts.
  • Close = the percentage of shots taken from close range.
  • dClose = the percentage of opponents' shots taken from close range.
  • Reb = the rebound percentage for the unit, based on chances.
  • T/O = the net turnover percentage for the unit based on opponent turnovers minus unit turnovers.

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts

Copyright 2017-18 by 82games.com, All Rights Reserved