Lance Stephenson of the Minnesota Timberwolves, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Lance Stephenson
Minnesota Timberwolves
2016-2017 NBA Season

More Lance Stephenson stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
1%	-11	1.04	1.13	-7.8	3	2	60.0

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 1.7 3.5 .476 .476 40% 0% .2 3.5

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 86% .444   38% 0% 2.7

Close 14% .667   50% 0% .7

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 14% .667   50% 0% .7

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 19% .250   100% 0% .3

11-15 19% .750   33% 0% 1.0

16-20 24% .200   0% 0% .3

21+ 38% .625   40% 0% 1.7

Crunch 62% .462   33% 0% 2.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
1	2	50.0	1.4	.7	22	1	4.5%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
3	1		1	5	3	1.7	1.4	3.6

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
	65	.0%	32.3%	10	65	15.4%	67.7%	15.4	100.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
	0		%	%	%	0	.0	.0%	1	.00	.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
	3	1		13.1

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Dunn-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Aldrich	10	1.05	.90	3	2	1	66
2	Jones-Stephenson-Muhammad-Wiggins-Towns	7	1.64	1.21	6	1	0	100
3	Rubio-Stephenson-Wiggins-Dieng-Towns	6	.80	1.54	-8	1	2	33
4	Jones-Dunn-Stephenson-Bjelica-Towns	6	1.45	1.40	2	1	0	100
5	Dunn-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Dieng	5	1.00	1.38	-2	0	1	0
6	Jones-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Aldrich	4	1.44	1.20	1	1	0	100
7	Jones-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Dieng	3	.67	.80	0	0	0	0
8	Jones-Dunn-Stephenson-Muhammad-Towns	3	.67	.83	-1	0	1	0
9	Rubio-Jones-Stephenson-Bjelica-Towns	2	1.20	1.67	-4	0	1	0
10	Rubio-Stephenson-Muhammad-Dieng-Towns	2	1.00	.80	0	1	1	50
11	Rubio-Stephenson-Wiggins-Dieng-Aldrich	2	.80	1.83	-7	0	1	0
12	Jones-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Towns	2	.50	.40	0	0	0	0
13	Dunn-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Towns	2	.67	1.00	-2	0	1	0
14	Jones-Stephenson-Rush-Bjelica-Aldrich	2	.50	1.00	-2	0	1	0
15	Rubio-Jones-Stephenson-Muhammad-Towns	1	.00	3.00	-3	0	1	0
16	Rubio-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Aldrich	1	1.33	.67	2	1	0	100
17	Jones-Dunn-Stephenson-Dieng-Towns	1	.00	.00	0	0	0	0
18	Rubio-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Dieng	0	.00	1.50	-3	0	1	0
19	Rubio-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Towns	0	2.50	.00	5	1	0	100
20	Rubio-Jones-Stephenson-Wiggins-Towns	0	2.00	.00	2	1	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Dunn-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Aldrich .500 .410 +1 28% 6%   68% -9%

2 Jones-Stephenson-Muhammad-Wiggins-Towns .820 .570 +4 45% 36%   67% -14%

3 Rubio-Stephenson-Wiggins-Dieng-Towns .270 .700 +2 9% 30%   38% +3%

4 Jones-Dunn-Stephenson-Bjelica-Towns .580 .500 -3 50% 20%   50% +1%

5 Dunn-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Dieng .570 .630 +1 57% 38%   25% +14%

6 Jones-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Aldrich .750 .570 -4 25% 29%   33% +9%

7 Jones-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Dieng .290 .400 0 0% 20%   48% +20%

8 Jones-Dunn-Stephenson-Muhammad-Towns .250 .330 +2 0% 0%   67% +17%

9 Rubio-Jones-Stephenson-Bjelica-Towns .500 .430 -2 25% 14%   25% 0%

10 Rubio-Stephenson-Muhammad-Dieng-Towns .330 .670 -1 50% 33%   75% +40%

11 Rubio-Stephenson-Wiggins-Dieng-Aldrich .170 .670 -1 17% 17%   58% 0%

12 Jones-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Towns 0 .250 +2 0% 50%   58% -10%

13 Dunn-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Towns .200 .330 -2 0% 0%   50% +25%

14 Jones-Stephenson-Rush-Bjelica-Aldrich .330 .330 0 0% 17%   25% -25%

15 Rubio-Jones-Stephenson-Muhammad-Towns 0 .330 0 0% 0%   0% -50%

16 Rubio-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Aldrich .670 .330 0 0% 0%   100% -33%

17 Jones-Dunn-Stephenson-Dieng-Towns 0 0 0 0% 50%   25% -67%

18 Rubio-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Dieng 0 .500 0 0% 0%   50% 0%

19 Rubio-Stephenson-Muhammad-Bjelica-Towns 1 0 +1 100% 0%   0% +100%

20 Rubio-Jones-Stephenson-Wiggins-Towns 0 0 +2 0% 0%   0% 0%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG	1%	-7	97.1	103.5	-6.4	3	2	60%
SF	0%	-4	90.2	103.1	-12.9	1	2	33%
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG	16.5	.500	1.8	11%	6.4	2.7	1.8	.0	1.8	17.4	9.7
SF	9.7	.333	.0	33%	9.7	6.4	6.4	.0	.0	6.4	.1
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG 11.0 .667 1.8 25% 5.5 9.2 5.5 .0 5.5 16.5 12.3

SF 25.8 .438 9.7 12% 3.2 .0 6.4 .0 3.2 32.2 8.5

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG 5.5 -.167 .0 -14% .9 -6.4 3.7 .0 3.7 .9 -2.6

SF -16.1 -.104 -9.7 21% 6.4 6.4 .0 .0 3.2 -25.8 -8.4

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
3%	+5	155.4	109.7	45.7	1	0	100.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 9.1 9.1 1.000 .000 0% 0% 0.0 0.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	9.1	0.0	1	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	%-18.3	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	3	0.0%	33.3%	0	5	0.0%	80.0%	0.0	113.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-26.9

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	67	3893	1%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	106.0	112.2	-6.2
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	112.8	113.2	-0.4
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-6.7	-1.0	-5.8
Points Scored	134	8523	-8389
Points Allowed	145	8603	-8458
Net Points	-11	-80	+69
Effective FG%	49.6%	51.1%	-1.6%
Effective FG% Allowed	53.9%	53.5%	+0.4%
Assisted Field Goals	59%	59%	+0%
Assisted FG% Allowed	47%	58%	-11%
Own Shots Blocked	0%	6%	-6%
Shots Blocked	3%	5%	-2%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	32.3%	29.8%	+2.5%
Defensive Rebounding	67.7%	72.6%	-4.9%
Total Rebounding	50.0%	51.2%	-1.2%
Stats
Free Throws Made	16	19	-3
Free Throws Attempted	22	24	-2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	14	17	+3
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	20	22	+2
Turnovers, on Offense	16	13	-3
Turnovers, on Defense	15	14	+1
Net Turnovers	-1	1	+2
Fouls Committed	22	19	-3
Fouls, Drawn	22	20	+2
Net Fouls	0	1	+1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts