Zach LaVine of the Minnesota Timberwolves, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Zach LaVine
Minnesota Timberwolves
2016-2017 NBA Season

More Zach LaVine stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
44%	-117	1.1	1.13	-3.2	17	30	36.2

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 6.9 15.1 .460 .544 60% 5% 2.5 18.9

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 73% .522   64% 2% 11.5

Close 21% .517   44% 19% 3.3

Dunk 4% 1.000   65% 0% 1.3

Other 1% .700   71% 10% .3

Inside 27% .604   51% 15% 4.9

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 41% .605   64% 7% 7.5

11-15 25% .560   58% 2% 4.1

16-20 22% .497   57% 6% 3.3

21+ 13% .401   41% 3% 1.6

Crunch 35% .461   52% 5% 4.8

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
117	140	83.6	3.8	3.2	770	61	7.9%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
39	56	33	12	140	34	4.1	3.9	3.8

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
19	1715	1.1%	30.3%	141	1614	8.7%	72.7%	9.8	103.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
6	4		%	1%	%	10	.3	.4%	45	.22	.7

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
7	34	44		13.4

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Rubio-LaVine-Wiggins-Dieng-Towns	879	1.10	1.13	-36	17	22	43
2	Dunn-LaVine-Wiggins-Dieng-Towns	159	1.17	1.22	-22	11	15	42
3	Dunn-LaVine-Muhammad-Bjelica-Aldrich	133	1.07	1.07	-9	12	15	44
4	Dunn-LaVine-Muhammad-Bjelica-Dieng	70	1.08	.93	21	11	8	57
5	Rubio-LaVine-Wiggins-Bjelica-Towns	61	1.17	1.22	-1	6	6	50
6	Jones-LaVine-Wiggins-Dieng-Towns	35	1.36	1.11	23	4	3	57
7	Rubio-LaVine-Muhammad-Dieng-Towns	26	1.02	1.33	-17	3	9	25
8	Rubio-LaVine-Wiggins-Bjelica-Dieng	26	.85	1.06	-6	4	4	50
9	Rubio-LaVine-Muhammad-Wiggins-Towns	25	1.14	1.19	-4	2	3	40
10	Jones-LaVine-Muhammad-Bjelica-Aldrich	24	1.13	1.20	0	3	3	50
11	Dunn-LaVine-Muhammad-Bjelica-Towns	23	1.07	.84	10	4	4	50
12	Rubio-LaVine-Wiggins-Towns-Aldrich	21	1.10	1.41	-12	3	3	50
13	Dunn-LaVine-Muhammad-Dieng-Towns	20	.90	.75	6	6	5	54
14	Dunn-LaVine-Wiggins-Bjelica-Towns	16	.97	1.30	-13	3	5	37
15	Jones-LaVine-Wiggins-Bjelica-Towns	15	1.26	1.11	7	3	2	60
16	Dunn-LaVine-Muhammad-Towns-Aldrich	12	.92	1.00	1	4	2	66
17	Jones-LaVine-Muhammad-Bjelica-Towns	12	1.13	1.09	1	2	1	66
18	Rubio-LaVine-Muhammad-Bjelica-Dieng	9	.63	.79	-3	3	3	50
19	Jones-LaVine-Muhammad-Wiggins-Towns	9	.71	1.27	-11	0	2	0
20	Jones-LaVine-Muhammad-Dieng-Towns	9	1.56	1.20	4	3	1	75

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Rubio-LaVine-Wiggins-Dieng-Towns .470 .480 +66 28% 24%   51% -2%

2 Dunn-LaVine-Wiggins-Dieng-Towns .480 .560 -9 32% 31%   57% 0%

3 Dunn-LaVine-Muhammad-Bjelica-Aldrich .460 .480 -28 33% 28%   55% +1%

4 Dunn-LaVine-Muhammad-Bjelica-Dieng .420 .420 -4 29% 31%   53% +5%

5 Rubio-LaVine-Wiggins-Bjelica-Towns .470 .470 -3 34% 35%   50% -8%

6 Jones-LaVine-Wiggins-Dieng-Towns .530 .490 -13 34% 23%   55% +12%

7 Rubio-LaVine-Muhammad-Dieng-Towns .530 .520 +1 28% 20%   39% -9%

8 Rubio-LaVine-Wiggins-Bjelica-Dieng .370 .440 -3 19% 42%   46% -7%

9 Rubio-LaVine-Muhammad-Wiggins-Towns .460 .510 -3 46% 32%   50% 0%

10 Jones-LaVine-Muhammad-Bjelica-Aldrich .510 .510 -5 34% 28%   44% 0%

11 Dunn-LaVine-Muhammad-Bjelica-Towns .330 .380 +7 37% 30%   66% -4%

12 Rubio-LaVine-Wiggins-Towns-Aldrich .440 .580 +4 41% 22%   55% -14%

13 Dunn-LaVine-Muhammad-Dieng-Towns .470 .370 -4 33% 23%   48% -3%

14 Dunn-LaVine-Wiggins-Bjelica-Towns .430 .550 -14 25% 55%   46% -16%

15 Jones-LaVine-Wiggins-Bjelica-Towns .530 .410 -17 38% 41%   56% +1%

16 Dunn-LaVine-Muhammad-Towns-Aldrich .350 .500 +4 22% 33%   64% -1%

17 Jones-LaVine-Muhammad-Bjelica-Towns .430 .530 +4 29% 32%   49% +13%

18 Rubio-LaVine-Muhammad-Bjelica-Dieng .260 .470 -1 26% 33%   55% +6%

19 Jones-LaVine-Muhammad-Wiggins-Towns .350 .590 +1 41% 35%   55% -16%

20 Jones-LaVine-Muhammad-Dieng-Towns .670 .430 -2 13% 33%   23% +5%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG	43%	-114	102.9	106.0	-3.1	18	29	38%
SF	0%	-5	99.6	113.8	-14.2	2	2	50%
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG	19.5	.545	3.8	27%	4.4	3.8	2.4	.3	2.8	24.4	16.3
SF	17.8	.500	7.1	20%	7.1	3.6	.0	.0	7.1	24.9	17.4
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG 15.6 .504 3.3 26% 5.9 4.0 2.3 .8 3.0 18.3 13.3

SF 14.2 .375 .0 0% 7.1 .0 .0 .0 .0 10.7 4.8

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG 3.9 .040 .5 1% -1.5 -.1 -.1 -.6 .1 6.1 3.0

SF 3.6 .125 7.1 20% .0 3.6 .0 .0 -7.1 14.2 12.6

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
56%	-16	98.2	106.2	-8.0	11	13	45.8%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 5.0 15.5 .323 .403 80% 0% 3.0 15.5

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 77% .354   67% 0% 0.7

Close 23% .571   100% 0% 0.3

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 23% .571   100% 0% 0.3

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 65% .500   88% 0% 0.8

11-15 6% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 26% .313   50% 0% 0.2

21+ 3% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 29% .278   33% 0% 0.2

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
6	7	85.7	3.5	3.0	33	2	6.1%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
1	1	0	0	2	3	0.7	-2.0	1.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
2	106	1.9%	33.0%	10	90	11.1%	78.9%	13.0	111.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	1	0	0%	3%	0%	1	0.5	0.7%	3	0.33	2.4

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	3	2	0	5.3

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1747	2213	44%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	110.6	113.3	-2.8
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	114.4	112.2	+2.2
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-3.9	+1.1	-5.0
Points Scored	3745	4912	-1167
Points Allowed	3862	4886	-1024
Net Points	-117	+26	-143
Effective FG%	50.9%	51.2%	-0.4%
Effective FG% Allowed	54.1%	53.0%	+1.0%
Assisted Field Goals	60%	59%	+1%
Assisted FG% Allowed	58%	58%	+0%
Own Shots Blocked	6%	5%	+1%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	30.3%	29.5%	+0.9%
Defensive Rebounding	72.7%	72.4%	+0.3%
Total Rebounding	51.5%	50.9%	+0.6%
Stats
Free Throws Made	17	20	-3
Free Throws Attempted	22	25	-3
Free Throws Made by Opp.	17	17	+0
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	22	22	+0
Turnovers, on Offense	14	13	-1
Turnovers, on Defense	13	14	-1
Net Turnovers	-1	1	+2
Fouls Committed	20	19	-1
Fouls, Drawn	19	21	-2
Net Fouls	-1	2	+3

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts