free NBA basketball picks
Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Los Angeles Lakers
2016-2017 NBA Season Stats
Lakers home page

Floor Time stats | 5-Man Units | Team Stats | W-L Profiles | By Position

Top Five-Man Floor Units
#
Unit
Min
Off
Def
+/-
W
L
Win%
1
 Russell-Young-Deng-Randle-Mozgov 401.1  1.13  1.06  +48   13   13  
50.0
2
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-NanceJr-Black 192.7  1.13  1.03  +33   11   8  
57.8
3
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Deng-NanceJr 58.0  1.32  1.07  +19   9   5  
64.2
4
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Robinson-Black 49.8  1.12  1.14  -8   4   6  
40.0
5
 Russell-Young-Ingram-Randle-Mozgov 49.3  1.00  1.40  -39   3   8  
27.2
6
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Deng-Robinson 45.8  0.97  1.06  -14   1   3  
25.0
7
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-NanceJr-Robinson 42.3  1.07  0.98  +9   3   1  
75.0
8
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Deng-Black 42.2  1.00  0.91  +8   5   3  
62.5
9
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-NanceJr-Randle 41.8  1.12  1.02  +11   5   5  
50.0
10
 Russell-Clarkson-Young-Ingram-Randle 38.4  1.06  1.09  +0   1   3  
25.0
11
 Calderon-Young-Deng-Randle-Mozgov 37.9  0.88  1.16  -20   1   3  
25.0
12
 Russell-Young-Ingram-Deng-Mozgov 31.4  1.12  0.98  +5   3   2  
60.0
13
 Calderon-Ingram-Deng-Randle-Mozgov 29.5  0.81  1.04  -13   1   2  
33.3
14
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-NanceJr-Mozgov 29.2  1.20  1.34  -10   6   6  
50.0
15
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Randle-Black 27.4  1.30  1.28  -4   5   5  
50.0
16
 Clarkson-Ingram-Deng-Randle-Mozgov 25.6  0.92  1.35  -21   2   4  
33.3
17
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Deng-Randle 23.2  1.25  1.22  +3   5   5  
50.0
18
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Randle-Mozgov 22.3  1.09  1.02  +4   3   4  
42.8
19
 Russell-Young-Deng-NanceJr-Randle 20.6  0.71  1.02  -15   3   5  
37.5
20
 Young-Ingram-Deng-Randle-Mozgov 20.1  0.84  1.18  -13   0   2  
0.0


Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details
#
Unit
eFG
eFGA
FTA
Close
dClose
Reb
T/O
1
 Russell-Young-Deng-Randle-Mozgov .460  .460  -24  23%  23%   50.5%  +2% 
2
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-NanceJr-Black .470  .420  +7  25%  26%   52.5%  -1% 
3
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Deng-NanceJr .570  .440  +6  33%  33%   51.0%  -1% 
4
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Robinson-Black .460  .480  -4  34%  18%   58.0%  -5% 
5
 Russell-Young-Ingram-Randle-Mozgov .440  .620  +11  15%  22%   49.5%  -4% 
6
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Deng-Robinson .460  .480  +11  31%  26%   51.5%  -4% 
7
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-NanceJr-Robinson .410  .460  +12  34%  32%   52.0%  +6% 
8
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Deng-Black .410  .410  +15  19%  28%   46.0%  +3% 
9
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-NanceJr-Randle .500  .400  +2  24%  35%   51.0%  -7% 
10
 Russell-Clarkson-Young-Ingram-Randle .420  .490  +2  23%  20%   52.5%  +5% 
11
 Calderon-Young-Deng-Randle-Mozgov .410  .530  -2  14%  27%   55.5%  -13% 
12
 Russell-Young-Ingram-Deng-Mozgov .450  .460  -8  25%  26%   48.5%  +6% 
13
 Calderon-Ingram-Deng-Randle-Mozgov .330  .450  +5  27%  17%   56.0%  -9% 
14
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-NanceJr-Mozgov .540  .600  -7  25%  32%   53.5%  +1% 
15
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Randle-Black .460  .570  -3  39%  29%   61.0%  +7% 
16
 Clarkson-Ingram-Deng-Randle-Mozgov .420  .470  -1  38%  21%   50.0%  -16% 
17
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Deng-Randle .440  .570  +5  28%  31%   54.0%  +11% 
18
 Clarkson-Williams-Ingram-Randle-Mozgov .490  .330  -3  22%  31%   52.0%  -11% 
19
 Russell-Young-Deng-NanceJr-Randle .340  .450  -2  18%  40%   32.0%  +7% 
20
 Young-Ingram-Deng-Randle-Mozgov .400  .450  -7  17%  21%   43.5%  -8% 

    Legend:
  • Min = the total minutes the unit was on the floor.

  • Off = the unit's points per possession.

  • Def = the unit's points per possession allowed.

  • +/- = the team net points for the unit.

  • W = number of games a unit outscored its opponents while on the court.

  • L = number of games a unit was outscored by its opponents while on the court.

  • Win% = the winning percentage for the unit based on Wins versus Losses.
  • eFG = the effective shooting percentage, adjusted for the value of 3-point shots.
  • eFGA = the effective shooting percentage allowed to opponents.
  • FTA = net free throw attempts.
  • Close = the percentage of shots taken from close range.
  • dClose = the percentage of opponents' shots taken from close range.
  • Reb = the rebound percentage for the unit, based on chances.
  • T/O = the net turnover percentage for the unit based on opponent turnovers minus unit turnovers.

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts

Copyright 2015-16 by 82games.com, All Rights Reserved