Udonis Haslem of the Miami Heat, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Udonis Haslem
Miami Heat
2015-2016 NBA Season

More Udonis Haslem stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
6%	-16	1.05	1.05	-3	15	20	42.9

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game .6 1.6 .377 .385 91% 2% .3 1.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 72% .307   100% 0% .7

Close 21% .538   86% 8% .4

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Other 7% .750   67% 0% .2

Inside 28% .588   80% 6% .5

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 16% .550   80% 10% .3

11-15 33% .450   100% 0% .5

16-20 26% .375   83% 0% .3

21+ 25% .200   100% 0% .2

Crunch 51% .290   89% 0% .5

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
12	16	75.0	3.0	2.2	65	4	6.2%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
5	5	4		14	1	14.0	3.0	2.6

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
10	227	4.4%	18.5%	65	241	27.0%	76.3%	31.4	94.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	1		%	1%	%	2	.4	.5%	16	.13	1.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
3	1	1		12.6

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Udrih-Green-Winslow-Haslem-Bosh	31	.97	.92	1	3	3	50
2	T.Johnson-Green-Winslow-Haslem-Bosh	24	1.21	1.22	-3	1	3	25
3	Richardson-Green-Winslow-Haslem-McRoberts	16	.97	1.03	-2	2	1	66
4	T.Johnson-Richardson-Winslow-Deng-Haslem	9	.32	.72	-7	0	2	0
5	Udrih-T.Johnson-Richardson-Winslow-Haslem	7	1.44	.81	10	1	0	100
6	Richardson-Green-Winslow-Haslem-Bosh	6	1.00	2.00	-12	0	1	0
7	Wade-T.Johnson-Richardson-Winslow-Haslem	5	1.11	1.10	-1	0	1	0
8	Wade-T.Johnson-Winslow-Haslem-Bosh	4	1.50	1.20	0	1	1	50
9	Dragic-Wade-Green-Deng-Haslem	4	.63	1.56	-9	0	3	0
10	Dragic-Richardson-Green-Winslow-Haslem	4	.50	1.14	-4	0	1	0
11	Dragic-Wade-Winslow-Deng-Haslem	4	1.50	.38	9	1	0	100
12	Udrih-Richardson-Green-Winslow-Haslem	3	1.00	.88	-1	1	1	50
13	Wade-Richardson-Winslow-Johnson-Haslem	3	1.33	.86	2	1	0	100
14	Richardson-Green-Winslow-Deng-Haslem	3	.86	2.14	-9	0	1	0
15	Dragic-Udrih-Green-Haslem-Bosh	3	.86	.63	1	1	1	50
16	Wade-Richardson-Green-Deng-Haslem	3	.57	.88	-3	0	2	0
17	Dragic-Richardson-Winslow-Deng-Haslem	3	.50	1.00	-4	1	2	33
18	Udrih-T.Johnson-Richardson-Haslem-Bosh	3	.86	1.14	-2	0	1	0
19	Udrih-T.Johnson-Richardson-Haslem-Andersen	3	.50	1.13	-5	0	1	0
20	Dragic-T.Johnson-Green-Winslow-Haslem	3	1.63	1.00	4	1	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Udrih-Green-Winslow-Haslem-Bosh .460 .430 0 11% 21%   38% +3%

2 T.Johnson-Green-Winslow-Haslem-Bosh .610 .540 -12 21% 24%   53% -2%

3 Richardson-Green-Winslow-Haslem-McRoberts .450 .440 -11 28% 13%   48% +3%

4 T.Johnson-Richardson-Winslow-Deng-Haslem .140 .430 +2 14% 36%   48% +1%

5 Udrih-T.Johnson-Richardson-Winslow-Haslem .670 .460 +7 22% 27%   61% 0%

6 Richardson-Green-Winslow-Haslem-Bosh .330 .700 -2 25% 10%   50% +9%

7 Wade-T.Johnson-Richardson-Winslow-Haslem .560 .500 0 33% 0%   68% -2%

8 Wade-T.Johnson-Winslow-Haslem-Bosh .710 .560 0 0% 0%   38% +10%

9 Dragic-Wade-Green-Deng-Haslem .290 .560 -4 14% 56%   25% -12%

10 Dragic-Richardson-Green-Winslow-Haslem .290 .670 0 29% 33%   60% -11%

11 Dragic-Wade-Winslow-Deng-Haslem .670 .200 -2 33% 20%   67% +25%

12 Udrih-Richardson-Green-Winslow-Haslem .330 .380 0 0% 38%   48% -4%

13 Wade-Richardson-Winslow-Johnson-Haslem .430 .380 +2 29% 38%   55% +14%

14 Richardson-Green-Winslow-Deng-Haslem .200 1 +4 0% 29%   0% 0%

15 Dragic-Udrih-Green-Haslem-Bosh .500 .250 0 50% 38%   67% -28%

16 Wade-Richardson-Green-Deng-Haslem .250 .330 -5 13% 33%   25% +25%

17 Dragic-Richardson-Winslow-Deng-Haslem .290 .400 -4 43% 20%   50% 0%

18 Udrih-T.Johnson-Richardson-Haslem-Bosh .500 .300 0 17% 40%   29% -14%

19 Udrih-T.Johnson-Richardson-Haslem-Andersen .200 .500 0 0% 17%   50% -13%

20 Dragic-T.Johnson-Green-Winslow-Haslem .710 .400 0 43% 20%   25% -1%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	4%	-12	94.8	98.2	-3.4	12	14	46%
C	2%	-5	90.5	92.7	-2.2	7	9	43%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	10.2	.375	2.3	25%	13.8	2.8	.8	.0	3.4	9.6	10.2
C	13.6	.400	4.3	32%	14.1	2.2	1.1	1.1	7.0	13.6	10.7

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 13.5 .594 5.1 29% 10.4 4.0 2.5 .3 2.8 18.9 16.9

C 16.8 .581 8.1 61% 13.0 2.2 2.2 1.6 4.3 23.9 20.4

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF -3.4 -.219 -2.8 -4% 3.4 -1.1 1.7 -.3 -.6 -9.3 -6.8

C -3.3 -.181 -3.8 -29% 1.1 .0 1.1 -.5 -2.7 -10.3 -9.8

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
2%	+1	118.4	105.2	13.2	1	1	50.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 13.2 26.3 .500 .500 100% 0% 0.0 26.3

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 50% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 50% 1.000   100% 0% 1.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 50% 1.000   100% 0% 1.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 50% 1.000   100% 0% 1.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 50% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 100% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	1	0.0	13.2	0.0	3	1	33.3%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	%-26.3	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	4	0.0%	50.0%	0	2	0.0%	100.0%	0.0	150.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-38.0

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	258	3706	6%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	103.8	108.1	-4.3
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	105.2	105.5	-0.3
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-1.4	+2.6	-4.0
Points Scored	503	7701	-7198
Points Allowed	519	7550	-7031
Net Points	-16	+151	-167
Effective FG%	52.4%	50.6%	+1.8%
Effective FG% Allowed	51.8%	48.3%	+3.4%
Assisted Field Goals	61%	53%	+8%
Assisted FG% Allowed	57%	54%	+3%
Own Shots Blocked	3%	5%	-2%
Shots Blocked	4%	7%	-3%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	18.5%	27.2%	-8.7%
Defensive Rebounding	76.3%	74.2%	+2.2%
Total Rebounding	47.4%	50.7%	-3.3%
Stats
Free Throws Made	12	17	-5
Free Throws Attempted	17	23	-6
Free Throws Made by Opp.	15	16	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	22	21	-1
Turnovers, on Offense	13	13	+0
Turnovers, on Defense	14	12	+2
Net Turnovers	1	-1	-2
Fouls Committed	19	18	-1
Fouls, Drawn	16	19	-3
Net Fouls	-3	1	+4

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts