Frank Kaminsky of the Charlotte Hornets, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Frank Kaminsky
Charlotte Hornets
2015-2016 NBA Season

More Frank Kaminsky stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
43%	-20	1.05	1.05	-0.6	33	40	45.2

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.7 6.5 .410 .474 71% 9% 1.3 7.5

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 63% .442   86% 5% 3.6

Close 29% .454   43% 19% 1.7

Dunk 3% .857   92% 14% .3

Other 6% .759   68% 3% .5

Inside 37% .528   54% 16% 2.5

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 31% .506   67% 8% 2.0

11-15 27% .511   78% 10% 1.8

16-20 29% .444   68% 11% 1.7

21+ 13% .393   71% 6% .7

Crunch 42% .428   69% 9% 2.3

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
108	148	73.0	4.2	3.0	587	62	10.6%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
56	24	17	1	98	11	8.9	2.7	2.8

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
69	1762	3.9%	23.7%	267	1732	15.4%	77.2%	19.3	100.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
13	30		1%	4%	%	43	1.2	1.5%	72	.60	3.6

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
16	11	31		10.3

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Lin-Lamb-Williams-Hawes-Kaminsky	92	1.19	.96	48	15	4	78
2	Walker-Lin-Lamb-Kaminsky-Jefferson	77	1.08	.95	16	7	8	46
3	Walker-Lin-Lamb-Hawes-Kaminsky	74	1.04	.93	18	9	11	45
4	Walker-Lin-Batum-Zeller-Kaminsky	69	1.15	1.04	19	8	8	50
5	Lin-Lamb-Batum-Hawes-Kaminsky	60	.95	.85	10	6	6	50
6	Lin-Lamb-Batum-Kaminsky-Jefferson	55	.94	1.16	-27	2	11	15
7	Walker-Lin-Batum-Kaminsky-Jefferson	48	1.00	.94	5	8	8	50
8	Roberts-Daniels-Harrison-Hansbrough-Kaminsky	39	1.04	1.04	0	4	5	44
9	Walker-Lin-Daniels-Kaminsky-Jefferson	37	1.17	.86	22	4	3	57
10	Walker-Lamb-Batum-Zeller-Kaminsky	35	.92	.79	11	6	5	54
11	Lin-Lamb-Lee-Kaminsky-Jefferson	34	.87	.82	3	2	4	33
12	Walker-Lin-Batum-Hawes-Kaminsky	31	1.22	1.14	0	6	6	50
13	Walker-Lin-Hairston-Hawes-Kaminsky	25	1.05	1.13	-2	4	4	50
14	Walker-Lee-Batum-Zeller-Kaminsky	25	1.20	.85	20	4	4	50
15	Lin-Daniels-Batum-Hawes-Kaminsky	25	1.26	1.16	6	1	2	33
16	Walker-Lin-Lamb-Zeller-Kaminsky	24	1.14	.84	14	5	1	83
17	Walker-Hairston-Batum-Zeller-Kaminsky	24	1.15	1.04	2	6	6	50
18	Lin-Lamb-Hairston-Hawes-Kaminsky	24	.78	1.10	-17	1	6	14
19	Walker-Lin-Lee-Kaminsky-Jefferson	22	1.21	1.40	-11	4	7	36
20	Lin-Lamb-Batum-Zeller-Kaminsky	21	1.13	.77	17	6	4	60

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Lin-Lamb-Williams-Hawes-Kaminsky .490 .400 +19 30% 27%   53% -3%

2 Walker-Lin-Lamb-Kaminsky-Jefferson .440 .420 +24 32% 20%   48% +8%

3 Walker-Lin-Lamb-Hawes-Kaminsky .430 .360 +8 23% 19%   43% 0%

4 Walker-Lin-Batum-Zeller-Kaminsky .410 .410 +25 36% 30%   55% -3%

5 Lin-Lamb-Batum-Hawes-Kaminsky .400 .360 +4 26% 28%   49% -1%

6 Lin-Lamb-Batum-Kaminsky-Jefferson .410 .510 +6 31% 37%   49% +3%

7 Walker-Lin-Batum-Kaminsky-Jefferson .450 .420 +6 20% 28%   51% +2%

8 Roberts-Daniels-Harrison-Hansbrough-Kaminsky .500 .500 +14 31% 30%   44% +10%

9 Walker-Lin-Daniels-Kaminsky-Jefferson .450 .380 +9 33% 30%   56% +9%

10 Walker-Lamb-Batum-Zeller-Kaminsky .410 .340 +10 25% 27%   55% -13%

11 Lin-Lamb-Lee-Kaminsky-Jefferson .410 .330 -4 34% 35%   44% -2%

12 Walker-Lin-Batum-Hawes-Kaminsky .550 .470 -1 28% 32%   56% -15%

13 Walker-Lin-Hairston-Hawes-Kaminsky .440 .500 -10 39% 29%   53% +5%

14 Walker-Lee-Batum-Zeller-Kaminsky .520 .380 -4 16% 40%   49% -1%

15 Lin-Daniels-Batum-Hawes-Kaminsky .550 .430 -4 29% 30%   56% -13%

16 Walker-Lin-Lamb-Zeller-Kaminsky .510 .380 -2 29% 20%   65% -11%

17 Walker-Hairston-Batum-Zeller-Kaminsky .410 .490 -2 24% 32%   47% +18%

18 Lin-Lamb-Hairston-Hawes-Kaminsky .330 .430 -4 30% 26%   42% -5%

19 Walker-Lin-Lee-Kaminsky-Jefferson .510 .580 +1 29% 21%   55% -5%

20 Lin-Lamb-Batum-Zeller-Kaminsky .470 .240 +2 33% 38%   47% -2%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	11%	-36	95.2	99.0	-3.8	18	21	46%
C	31%	+15	99.9	99.3	.6	34	39	46%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	13.1	.516	3.9	32%	8.5	2.1	1.4	1.1	3.8	16.4	14.3
C	15.3	.461	4.3	38%	9.8	3.0	1.7	1.3	3.5	17.3	13.0

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 19.3 .535 5.4 28% 10.8 2.2 3.0 1.4 3.8 24.7 22.5

C 15.5 .489 5.8 53% 13.7 2.7 3.0 3.1 5.6 19.5 21.1

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF -6.2 -.019 -1.5 4% -2.3 -.1 1.7 -.3 .0 -8.3 -8.2

C -.2 -.028 -1.5 -15% -3.9 .3 1.2 -1.8 2.1 -2.2 -8.0

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
23%	+40	118.7	65.4	53.4	6	2	75.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 1.3 13.3 .100 .150 100% 20% 2.7 6.7

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 80% .188   100% 13% 0.3

Close 20% .000   0% 50% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 20% .000   0% 50% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 30% .000   0% 33% 0.0

11-15 10% .000   0% 100% 0.0

16-20 60% .250   100% 0% 0.3

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 70% .214   50% 0% 0.3

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	4	50.0	5.3	2.7	12	2	16.7%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
2	0	0	0	2	1	2.0	0.0	2.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
4	38	10.5%	39.5%	5	46	10.9%	67.4%	21.4	106.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	1	0	0%	9%	0%	1	1.3	1.6%	1	1.00	6.5

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	6.0

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1708	2262	43%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	104.9	111.7	-6.8
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	104.8	106.0	-1.1
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+0.0	+5.7	-5.7
Points Scored	3510	4969	-1459
Points Allowed	3530	4726	-1196
Net Points	-20	+243	-263
Effective FG%	48.1%	51.7%	-3.6%
Effective FG% Allowed	48.8%	50.3%	-1.5%
Assisted Field Goals	57%	59%	-2%
Assisted FG% Allowed	60%	61%	-1%
Own Shots Blocked	7%	5%	+2%
Shots Blocked	6%	6%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	23.7%	22.6%	+1.2%
Defensive Rebounding	77.2%	76.2%	+1.0%
Total Rebounding	50.5%	49.4%	+1.1%
Stats
Free Throws Made	19	18	+1
Free Throws Attempted	25	22	+3
Free Throws Made by Opp.	17	15	-2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	22	19	-3
Turnovers, on Offense	13	11	-2
Turnovers, on Defense	12	13	-1
Net Turnovers	-1	2	+3
Fouls Committed	18	17	-1
Fouls, Drawn	21	19	+2
Net Fouls	3	2	-1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts