Shabazz Napier of the Miami Heat, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Shabazz Napier
Miami Heat
2014-2015 NBA Season

More Shabazz Napier stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
25%	-35	1.04	1.05	-1.7	23	26	46.9

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 1.7 4.5 .382 .476 48% 4% .9 5.1

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 85% .484   53% 2% 3.7

Close 15% .429   27% 14% .6

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 15% .429   27% 14% .6

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 27% .402   33% 7% 1.0

11-15 21% .604   59% 0% 1.1

16-20 24% .491   59% 5% 1.1

21+ 28% .438   41% 2% 1.1

Crunch 52% .462   50% 3% 2.2

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
44	56	78.6	2.7	2.1	252	24	9.5%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
48	45	26	11	130	49	2.7	4.3	6.2

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
18	908	2.0%	27.9%	95	925	10.3%	72.2%	12.3	100.1

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
3	1		%	%	%	4	.2	.3%	39	.10	.4

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
4	49	28		10.4

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Napier-Chalmers-Deng-Bosh-Whiteside	85	1.04	1.08	-7	3	4	42
2	Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Haslem-McRoberts	32	.93	1.05	-8	2	2	50
3	Napier-Chalmers-Deng-Williams-Bosh	30	1.10	1.07	3	5	3	62
4	Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-McRoberts-Bosh	30	.98	.85	10	4	2	66
5	Napier-Chalmers-Deng-Bosh-Andersen	28	1.29	.90	17	5	2	71
6	Napier-Chalmers-Deng-Haslem-Bosh	28	1.27	1.00	16	6	1	85
7	Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Bosh-Andersen	26	.98	1.00	0	3	3	50
8	Napier-Chalmers-Deng-McRoberts-Bosh	22	1.05	.68	13	7	2	77
9	Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Williams-Haslem	22	.62	.93	-13	1	4	20
10	Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Bosh-Hamilton	21	1.11	1.10	-3	1	2	33
11	Napier-Chalmers-Granger-Bosh-Whiteside	21	.98	.93	0	1	1	50
12	Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Deng-Andersen	20	1.25	1.17	8	3	2	60
13	Napier-Chalmers-Deng-Williams-Haslem	19	.97	1.00	0	3	3	50
14	Napier-Chalmers-Wade-Williams-Bosh	16	1.09	1.08	-4	1	4	20
15	Napier-Brown-Deng-Williams-Bosh	15	.96	.83	2	2	1	66
16	Napier-Chalmers-Wade-McRoberts-Bosh	14	.89	1.13	-3	2	3	40
17	Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Williams-Bosh	13	1.30	1.08	4	3	3	50
18	Napier-Chalmers-Granger-Bosh-Andersen	13	.63	1.00	-7	1	2	33
19	Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-McRoberts-Andersen	13	.82	1.08	-9	2	2	50
20	Napier-Chalmers-Wade-Williams-Haslem	13	.87	1.35	-11	1	2	33

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Napier-Chalmers-Deng-Bosh-Whiteside .444 .474 +4 37% 29%   55% -3%

2 Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Haslem-McRoberts .385 .538 0 23% 40%   45% +4%

3 Napier-Chalmers-Deng-Williams-Bosh .477 .468 +3 20% 32%   57% -8%

4 Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-McRoberts-Bosh .478 .353 -3 30% 29%   47% -9%

5 Napier-Chalmers-Deng-Bosh-Andersen .543 .404 +4 20% 32%   39% +19%

6 Napier-Chalmers-Deng-Haslem-Bosh .545 .452 +10 32% 29%   55% +7%

7 Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Bosh-Andersen .465 .462 -5 40% 41%   53% -4%

8 Napier-Chalmers-Deng-McRoberts-Bosh .406 .265 +4 31% 35%   59% -6%

9 Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Williams-Haslem .152 .520 +2 24% 28%   43% +23%

10 Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Bosh-Hamilton .500 .394 +2 42% 27%   46% -7%

11 Napier-Chalmers-Granger-Bosh-Whiteside .395 .447 +6 26% 26%   68% -10%

12 Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Deng-Andersen .606 .500 -4 36% 27%   48% +8%

13 Napier-Chalmers-Deng-Williams-Haslem .406 .469 +4 28% 47%   49% +6%

14 Napier-Chalmers-Wade-Williams-Bosh .433 .462 -6 27% 31%   49% +10%

15 Napier-Brown-Deng-Williams-Bosh .545 .393 0 32% 29%   43% -5%

16 Napier-Chalmers-Wade-McRoberts-Bosh .421 .375 0 26% 25%   38% -10%

17 Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Williams-Bosh .563 .455 +4 31% 27%   52% -5%

18 Napier-Chalmers-Granger-Bosh-Andersen .313 .474 +1 13% 37%   52% -19%

19 Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-McRoberts-Andersen .353 .478 -1 29% 39%   39% -6%

20 Napier-Chalmers-Wade-Williams-Haslem .381 .550 -1 48% 30%   43% 0%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	25%	-29	91.5	92.8	-1.4	25	24	51%
SG	0%	-7	90.4	105.8	-15.4	1	2	33%
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	10.7	.473	2.6	15%	5.5	6.1	3.9	.2	3.5	12.1	9.3
SG	17.6	.563	4.4	25%	.0	8.8	2.2	.0	6.6	24.3	19.2
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 16.3 .560 5.2 24% 4.4 7.9 3.6 .2 4.1 22.4 18.6

SG 13.2 .750 8.8 0% 2.2 .0 4.4 .0 6.6 28.7 20.5

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG -5.6 -.087 -2.6 -9% 1.1 -1.7 -.2 .0 .6 -10.2 -9.2

SG 4.4 -.188 -4.4 25% -2.2 8.8 2.2 .0 .0 -4.4 -1.3

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
17%	0	71.8	71.8	0.0	6	5	54.5%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 2.0 8.0 .250 .250 100% 0% 0.0 4.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 75% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 25% 1.000   100% 0% 0.2

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 25% 1.000   100% 0% 0.2

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 25% 1.000   100% 0% 0.2

16-20 25% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 50% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 75% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	2.0	0.0	4	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	2	0	2	1	2.0	4.0	4.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	20	0.0%	25.0%	2	32	6.3%	59.4%	6.3	84.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	2	0	7.0

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1011	2933	25%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	104.1	106.1	-2.0
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	105.3	109.2	-3.9
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-1.2	-3.1	+1.9
Points Scored	1927	5837	-3910
Points Allowed	1962	6015	-4053
Net Points	-35	-178	+143
Effective FG%	49.0%	50.3%	-1.3%
Effective FG% Allowed	50.2%	50.6%	-0.3%
Assisted Field Goals	58%	55%	+3%
Assisted FG% Allowed	61%	58%	+3%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	27.9%	26.5%	+1.4%
Defensive Rebounding	72.2%	69.3%	+2.9%
Total Rebounding	50.0%	47.9%	+2.2%
Stats
Free Throws Made	18	17	+1
Free Throws Attempted	24	23	+1
Free Throws Made by Opp.	16	17	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	21	23	+2
Turnovers, on Offense	15	14	-1
Turnovers, on Defense	15	14	+1
Net Turnovers	0	0	+0
Fouls Committed	19	19	+0
Fouls, Drawn	22	20	+2
Net Fouls	3	1	-2

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts