Chris Andersen of the Miami Heat, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Chris Andersen
Miami Heat
2014-2015 NBA Season

More Chris Andersen stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
28%	+1	1.04	1.05	0	29	30	49.2

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.0 3.5 .580 .589 79% 10% 1.3 5.3

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 43% .556   90% 2% 1.7

Close 29% .533   81% 25% 1.1

Dunk 16% .912   84% 6% 1.0

Tips 11% .391   0% 9% .3

Inside 57% .615   72% 16% 2.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 43% .600   57% 8% 1.8

11-15 25% .647   97% 6% 1.1

16-20 22% .456   95% 22% .7

21+ 10% .690   100% 5% .5

Crunch 32% .530   97% 17% 1.2

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
76	114	66.7	4.8	3.2	254	47	18.5%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
6	16	19	2	43	19	2.3	1.3	1.8

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
76	992	7.7%	24.7%	223	1086	20.5%	69.2%	28.2	93.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
10	47	4	1%	9%	5%	61	2.6	3.3%	58	1.05	9.6

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
6	19	12	3	8.0

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Chalmers-Wade-Deng-Bosh-Andersen	117	.97	1.07	-19	4	6	40
2	Chalmers-Wade-Deng-Williams-Andersen	60	1.18	1.07	13	4	4	50
3	G.Dragic-Chalmers-Walker-Beasley-Andersen	37	.90	.75	10	4	2	66
4	Chalmers-Wade-Granger-Deng-Andersen	29	1.07	1.30	-15	2	6	25
5	Cole-Wade-Deng-Williams-Andersen	29	1.13	.88	16	5	1	83
6	Napier-Chalmers-Deng-Bosh-Andersen	28	1.29	.90	17	5	2	71
7	Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Bosh-Andersen	26	.98	1.00	0	3	3	50
8	G.Dragic-Wade-Walker-Deng-Andersen	25	1.22	1.00	12	3	2	60
9	Cole-Wade-Deng-Bosh-Andersen	24	1.14	1.15	-4	4	3	57
10	Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Deng-Andersen	20	1.25	1.17	8	3	2	60
11	Cole-Chalmers-Deng-Williams-Andersen	20	1.18	.82	15	4	1	80
12	Cole-Johnson-Granger-Bosh-Andersen	19	.89	1.22	-12	1	2	33
13	Chalmers-Wade-Johnson-Beasley-Andersen	18	.63	1.16	-18	0	4	0
14	Cole-Chalmers-Deng-Bosh-Andersen	17	.87	1.31	-15	1	5	16
15	G.Dragic-Chalmers-Deng-Beasley-Andersen	15	1.00	1.03	-2	3	3	50
16	Cole-Chalmers-Granger-Deng-Andersen	14	1.37	1.04	11	2	1	66
17	Cole-Johnson-Ennis-Bosh-Andersen	14	.86	.91	-4	1	2	33
18	G.Dragic-Chalmers-Walker-Deng-Andersen	14	1.50	1.00	18	4	1	80
19	G.Dragic-Wade-Deng-Beasley-Andersen	13	.84	1.33	-11	1	2	33
20	Napier-Chalmers-Granger-Bosh-Andersen	13	.63	1.00	-7	1	2	33

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Chalmers-Wade-Deng-Bosh-Andersen .472 .469 +19 33% 36%   47% -3%

2 Chalmers-Wade-Deng-Williams-Andersen .525 .462 0 34% 38%   52% -3%

3 G.Dragic-Chalmers-Walker-Beasley-Andersen .410 .273 0 39% 36%   51% -6%

4 Chalmers-Wade-Granger-Deng-Andersen .386 .500 -1 20% 33%   46% 0%

5 Cole-Wade-Deng-Williams-Andersen .500 .405 +1 27% 24%   54% +5%

6 Napier-Chalmers-Deng-Bosh-Andersen .543 .404 +4 20% 32%   39% +19%

7 Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Bosh-Andersen .465 .462 -5 40% 41%   53% -4%

8 G.Dragic-Wade-Walker-Deng-Andersen .511 .475 +4 29% 33%   50% +10%

9 Cole-Wade-Deng-Bosh-Andersen .462 .500 -3 31% 30%   45% +4%

10 Napier-Chalmers-Ennis-Deng-Andersen .606 .500 -4 36% 27%   48% +8%

11 Cole-Chalmers-Deng-Williams-Andersen .548 .387 +3 29% 48%   50% +4%

12 Cole-Johnson-Granger-Bosh-Andersen .364 .552 -2 21% 28%   49% +8%

13 Chalmers-Wade-Johnson-Beasley-Andersen .308 .600 +7 42% 30%   54% -11%

14 Cole-Chalmers-Deng-Bosh-Andersen .458 .531 +3 25% 44%   34% -7%

15 G.Dragic-Chalmers-Deng-Beasley-Andersen .435 .536 +3 22% 39%   47% 0%

16 Cole-Chalmers-Granger-Deng-Andersen .706 .360 +5 41% 24%   36% +2%

17 Cole-Johnson-Ennis-Bosh-Andersen .310 .419 +2 17% 35%   46% +6%

18 G.Dragic-Chalmers-Walker-Deng-Andersen .680 .429 0 48% 43%   40% +1%

19 G.Dragic-Wade-Deng-Beasley-Andersen .320 .591 +2 36% 27%   48% +8%

20 Napier-Chalmers-Granger-Bosh-Andersen .313 .474 +1 13% 37%   52% -19%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	0%	-8	81.2	104.9	-23.7		3	0%
C	28%	+8	93.7	93.3	.3	30	29	50%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	16.9	.800	.0	20%	3.4	.0	3.4	3.4	6.8	27.1	23.1
C	8.7	.584	4.9	57%	12.8	1.8	1.7	2.6	3.7	13.4	17.7

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 16.9 .400 .0 60% 20.3 3.4 .0 .0 .0 13.5 17.0

C 15.2 .520 5.2 61% 14.3 2.0 2.8 1.8 4.8 19.6 18.7

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF .0 .400 .0 -40% -16.9 -3.4 -3.4 3.4 -6.8 13.5 6.1

C -6.5 .064 -.3 -4% -1.5 -.1 1.1 .8 1.1 -6.1 -1.0

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
23%	+6	99.4	90.4	9.0	5	6	45.5%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 1.5 3.0 .500 .500 100% 0% 9.0 12.1

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 50% 1.000   100% 0% 0.2

Tips 50% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 100% .500   100% 0% 0.2

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 100% .500   100% 0% 0.2

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 100% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
6	8	75.0	12.1	9.0	5	3	60.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	-3.0	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
1	29	3.4%	20.7%	5	26	19.2%	57.7%	22.7	78.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	2	0	0%	11%	0%	2	3.0	4.3%	3	0.67	14.2

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-2.0

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1130	2814	28%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	104.3	106.1	-1.8
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	104.3	109.8	-5.5
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+0.0	-3.6	+3.7
Points Scored	2202	5562	-3360
Points Allowed	2201	5776	-3575
Net Points	+1	-214	+215
Effective FG%	50.4%	49.8%	+0.6%
Effective FG% Allowed	48.4%	51.3%	-2.9%
Assisted Field Goals	58%	55%	+3%
Assisted FG% Allowed	59%	58%	+1%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	24.7%	27.6%	-2.9%
Defensive Rebounding	69.2%	70.3%	-1.1%
Total Rebounding	47.0%	49.0%	-2.0%
Stats
Free Throws Made	17	17	+0
Free Throws Attempted	23	23	+0
Free Throws Made by Opp.	16	17	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	21	23	+2
Turnovers, on Offense	15	14	-1
Turnovers, on Defense	15	14	+1
Net Turnovers	0	0	+0
Fouls Committed	19	20	+1
Fouls, Drawn	20	20	+0
Net Fouls	1	0	-1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts