Spencer Hawes of the Los Angeles Clippers, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Spencer Hawes
Los Angeles Clippers
2014-2015 NBA Season

More Spencer Hawes stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
32%	-88	1.06	1.08	-3.3	28	43	39.4

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.2 5.7 .394 .460 84% 6% .6 5.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 71% .423   93% 4% 3.4

Close 25% .529   73% 13% 1.5

Dunk 2% .900   78% 10% .2

Tips 1% .333   0% 0% .1

Inside 29% .550   71% 13% 1.8

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 32% .416   76% 12% 1.5

11-15 30% .508   89% 3% 1.7

16-20 26% .468   82% 4% 1.4

21+ 12% .440   95% 4% .6

Crunch 38% .459   86% 4% 2.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
44	68	64.7	2.6	1.7	444	30	6.8%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
39	27	16	6	88	20	4.4	3.1	3.3

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
30	1236	2.4%	20.6%	228	1294	17.6%	72.0%	20.0	92.7

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
24	29		2%	6%	%	53	2.0	2.5%	118	.45	5.3

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
10	20	27	4	10.1

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Paul-Redick-Barnes-Hawes-Jordan	198	1.17	1.03	47	10	6	62
2	Rivers-Crawford-Turkoglu-Davis-Hawes	62	1.02	1.09	-8	4	6	40
3	Farmar-Crawford-Turkoglu-Davis-Hawes	57	1.05	.95	11	4	6	40
4	Farmar-Crawford-Bullock-Davis-Hawes	47	1.01	1.03	-3	4	5	44
5	Paul-Crawford-Barnes-Hawes-Jordan	43	1.10	1.34	-23	4	11	26
6	Paul-Crawford-Redick-Hawes-Jordan	42	1.09	1.14	-3	7	10	41
7	Paul-Crawford-Redick-Griffin-Hawes	35	1.01	1.15	-8	5	10	33
8	Paul-Crawford-Barnes-Griffin-Hawes	34	1.09	.96	7	10	4	71
9	Paul-Redick-Barnes-Griffin-Hawes	30	1.15	1.05	9	6	7	46
10	Paul-Redick-Hamilton-Hawes-Jordan	26	1.23	.94	15	2	0	100
11	Rivers-Crawford-Barnes-Davis-Hawes	24	1.00	.98	4	4	3	57
12	Farmar-Crawford-Bullock-Hawes-Jordan	21	.91	.90	4	5	2	71
13	Paul-Rivers-Barnes-Hawes-Jordan	20	.88	1.13	-7	1	3	25
14	Farmar-Crawford-Bullock-Griffin-Hawes	20	1.00	.95	0	3	3	50
15	Rivers-Redick-Turkoglu-Davis-Hawes	19	.92	.92	-1	2	2	50
16	Farmar-Crawford-Barnes-Davis-Hawes	19	1.03	1.00	1	2	3	40
17	Rivers-Hamilton-Turkoglu-Davis-Hawes	17	1.17	1.11	0	1	1	50
18	Rivers-Crawford-Turkoglu-Hawes-Jordan	16	.94	1.09	-6	2	3	40
19	Rivers-Hudson-Turkoglu-Davis-Hawes	14	1.24	.63	16	2	1	66
20	Farmar-Crawford-Redick-Hawes-Jordan	14	1.04	.81	5	4	2	66

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Paul-Redick-Barnes-Hawes-Jordan .494 .418 -30 25% 25%   50% 0%

2 Rivers-Crawford-Turkoglu-Davis-Hawes .423 .433 -7 25% 32%   51% -5%

3 Farmar-Crawford-Turkoglu-Davis-Hawes .446 .387 -8 21% 23%   49% 0%

4 Farmar-Crawford-Bullock-Davis-Hawes .418 .450 0 19% 36%   47% +2%

5 Paul-Crawford-Barnes-Hawes-Jordan .500 .569 -1 23% 25%   44% +1%

6 Paul-Crawford-Redick-Hawes-Jordan .537 .408 -1 22% 34%   40% -1%

7 Paul-Crawford-Redick-Griffin-Hawes .413 .389 -7 24% 26%   38% -4%

8 Paul-Crawford-Barnes-Griffin-Hawes .491 .421 -2 33% 32%   46% +8%

9 Paul-Redick-Barnes-Griffin-Hawes .521 .447 +2 29% 30%   45% +5%

10 Paul-Redick-Hamilton-Hawes-Jordan .471 .388 -3 18% 33%   54% -2%

11 Rivers-Crawford-Barnes-Davis-Hawes .432 .367 +1 23% 27%   44% -4%

12 Farmar-Crawford-Bullock-Hawes-Jordan .412 .316 -1 21% 32%   49% -13%

13 Paul-Rivers-Barnes-Hawes-Jordan .389 .395 -6 33% 45%   56% -19%

14 Farmar-Crawford-Bullock-Griffin-Hawes .371 .333 -5 23% 43%   48% -11%

15 Rivers-Redick-Turkoglu-Davis-Hawes .452 .333 -2 16% 26%   41% -5%

16 Farmar-Crawford-Barnes-Davis-Hawes .429 .455 -2 20% 24%   42% +11%

17 Rivers-Hamilton-Turkoglu-Davis-Hawes .533 .455 -3 10% 18%   40% +5%

18 Rivers-Crawford-Turkoglu-Hawes-Jordan .387 .467 -3 13% 27%   61% -10%

19 Rivers-Hudson-Turkoglu-Davis-Hawes .571 .273 +1 24% 5%   38% +8%

20 Farmar-Crawford-Redick-Hawes-Jordan .455 .333 +3 36% 37%   45% -1%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	12%	+18	103.5	101.8	1.7	30	25	54%
C	19%	-106	93.9	100.5	-6.6	25	43	36%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	15.7	.412	3.0	30%	7.7	3.4	2.4	2.0	6.0	14.6	6.8
C	15.6	.492	2.2	27%	11.1	3.2	2.2	2.0	6.9	16.9	12.0

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 19.0 .428 5.5 32% 11.6 2.8 1.7 1.4 4.3 20.3 14.2

C 13.7 .564 6.4 52% 16.1 2.1 2.7 1.7 3.9 19.4 19.2

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF -3.3 -.015 -2.5 -2% -3.9 .6 -.7 .6 -1.7 -5.7 -7.4

C 1.9 -.072 -4.2 -25% -5.1 1.2 .5 .2 -3.0 -2.5 -7.2

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
7%	-4	82.4	101.8	-19.4	3	3	50.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 4.8 14.5 .333 .500 100% 0% 0.0 14.5

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 100% .500   100% 0% 0.4

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 67% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 33% 1.500   100% 0% 0.4

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 67% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	4.8	0.0	3	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	1	0	1	0	1.0	0.0	4.8

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	15	0.0%	26.7%	0	8	0.0%	87.5%	0.0	114.2

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	0	0	14%	0%	0%	1	4.8	8.3%	1	1.00	16.7

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	1.5

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1273	2671	32%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	105.4	118.1	-12.8
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	108.8	106.1	+2.7
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-3.4	+12.1	-15.5
Points Scored	2593	6158	-3565
Points Allowed	2681	5530	-2849
Net Points	-88	+628	-716
Effective FG%	51.1%	54.3%	-3.2%
Effective FG% Allowed	49.1%	49.4%	-0.2%
Assisted Field Goals	60%	63%	-3%
Assisted FG% Allowed	62%	64%	-2%
Own Shots Blocked	4%	3%	+1%
Shots Blocked	4%	6%	-2%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	20.6%	28.4%	-7.8%
Defensive Rebounding	72.0%	73.2%	-1.2%
Total Rebounding	46.3%	50.8%	-4.5%
Stats
Free Throws Made	15	19	-4
Free Throws Attempted	21	26	-5
Free Throws Made by Opp.	20	18	-2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	28	24	-4
Turnovers, on Offense	12	12	+0
Turnovers, on Defense	13	14	-1
Net Turnovers	1	2	+1
Fouls Committed	23	19	-4
Fouls, Drawn	18	22	-4
Net Fouls	-5	3	+8

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts