Deron Williams of the Brooklyn Nets, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Deron Williams
Brooklyn Nets
2014-2015 NBA Season

More Deron Williams stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
53%	-17	1.07	1.08	-0.4	29	36	44.6

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 4.4 11.4 .387 .444 37% 5% 3.0 13.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 77% .446   45% 2% 7.8

Close 23% .437   16% 13% 2.2

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Tips 0% .500   0% 0% .0

Inside 23% .435   16% 12% 2.3

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 37% .450   27% 6% 3.8

11-15 30% .396   32% 4% 2.7

16-20 22% .503   53% 3% 2.5

21+ 11% .433   50% 4% 1.0

Crunch 33% .480   52% 3% 3.6

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
201	241	83.4	5.5	4.6	864	92	10.6%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
113	167	142	26	448	92	4.9	11.0	10.2

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
29	2083	1.4%	26.0%	208	2073	10.0%	72.7%	11.4	98.7

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
6	11		%	1%	%	17	.4	.5%	71	.24	1.1

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
12	92	50		23.4

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Williams-Brown-Johnson-Young-Lopez	255	1.11	1.04	25	11	11	50
2	Williams-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Garnett-Lopez	179	1.08	1.05	10	7	6	53
3	Williams-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Young-Lopez	135	1.06	1.18	-27	7	11	38
4	Williams-Brown-Anderson-Johnson-Plumlee	73	1.05	1.03	2	2	5	28
5	Williams-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Teletovic-Lopez	67	1.04	.98	9	5	5	50
6	Williams-Jack-Johnson-Teletovic-Lopez	53	.87	1.06	-20	5	6	45
7	Williams-Jack-Johnson-Young-Lopez	44	1.06	.98	11	7	6	53
8	Williams-Jack-Johnson-Garnett-Lopez	44	.99	1.16	-8	6	5	54
9	Williams-Jack-Anderson-Johnson-Lopez	43	1.12	1.14	6	5	4	55
10	Williams-Anderson-Johnson-Teletovic-Lopez	38	1.21	.76	32	7	0	100
11	Williams-Jack-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Lopez	36	1.11	1.24	3	6	5	54
12	Williams-Brown-Anderson-Johnson-Lopez	35	1.16	1.08	9	4	6	40
13	Williams-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Plumlee-Lopez	33	1.02	1.16	-10	4	7	36
14	Williams-Jack-Johnson-Young-Plumlee	30	.98	1.02	-2	3	5	37
15	Williams-Johnson-Karasev-Plumlee-Garnett	29	1.11	.85	14	3	1	75
16	Williams-Anderson-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Lopez	27	1.15	1.14	3	2	4	33
17	Williams-Brown-Bogdanovic-Young-Lopez	26	1.09	1.25	-6	2	5	28
18	Williams-Jack-Anderson-Teletovic-Plumlee	26	1.02	1.09	-1	3	3	50
19	Williams-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Plumlee-Garnett	25	1.37	1.31	0	2	3	40
20	Williams-Anderson-Johnson-Teletovic-Plumlee	25	1.23	1.12	4	4	2	66

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Williams-Brown-Johnson-Young-Lopez .466 .462 +37 35% 30%   51% +5%

2 Williams-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Garnett-Lopez .495 .464 -12 32% 31%   47% +3%

3 Williams-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Young-Lopez .434 .506 +4 38% 36%   48% +4%

4 Williams-Brown-Anderson-Johnson-Plumlee .466 .470 -2 25% 34%   42% +5%

5 Williams-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Teletovic-Lopez .439 .371 +2 34% 32%   49% -4%

6 Williams-Jack-Johnson-Teletovic-Lopez .374 .468 -4 29% 33%   47% -4%

7 Williams-Jack-Johnson-Young-Lopez .474 .406 -7 30% 25%   51% -2%

8 Williams-Jack-Johnson-Garnett-Lopez .438 .520 +22 33% 37%   46% -1%

9 Williams-Jack-Anderson-Johnson-Lopez .494 .468 -9 25% 31%   46% -3%

10 Williams-Anderson-Johnson-Teletovic-Lopez .463 .317 +9 27% 15%   57% +9%

11 Williams-Jack-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Lopez .429 .439 -5 24% 33%   46% -5%

12 Williams-Brown-Anderson-Johnson-Lopez .485 .500 +10 29% 39%   49% +10%

13 Williams-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Plumlee-Lopez .409 .558 -8 30% 25%   54% +6%

14 Williams-Jack-Johnson-Young-Plumlee .489 .393 +8 32% 38%   45% 0%

15 Williams-Johnson-Karasev-Plumlee-Garnett .471 .356 0 29% 24%   56% +6%

16 Williams-Anderson-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Lopez .490 .510 +1 35% 35%   48% +4%

17 Williams-Brown-Bogdanovic-Young-Lopez .481 .571 -1 48% 37%   53% 0%

18 Williams-Jack-Anderson-Teletovic-Plumlee .442 .510 +21 35% 29%   49% +4%

19 Williams-Johnson-Bogdanovic-Plumlee-Garnett .560 .574 -10 24% 55%   50% -1%

20 Williams-Anderson-Johnson-Teletovic-Plumlee .556 .525 -6 36% 38%   53% +4%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	53%	-18	99.3	99.7	-.4	29	36	44%
SG
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	17.5	.444	5.5	22%	5.4	10.2	3.5	.4	3.5	20.1	15.9
SG
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 16.7 .486 4.4 25% 6.2 8.6 3.8 .3 3.6 19.4 14.9

SG

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG .8 -.043 1.0 -3% -.8 1.5 .3 .1 .0 .7 .9

SG

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
60%	-20	84.9	94.3	-9.3	12	14	46.2%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 4.7 14.9 .313 .375 60% 6% 5.1 16.3

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 81% .385   75% 4% 0.7

Close 19% .333   0% 17% 0.1

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 19% .333   0% 17% 0.1

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 25% .563   50% 13% 0.3

11-15 34% .455   75% 0% 0.4

16-20 28% .278   50% 11% 0.2

21+ 13% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 41% .192   33% 8% 0.2

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
11	12	91.7	5.6	5.1	34	2	5.9%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
1	8	2	1	12	5	2.4	3.3	5.6

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
1	114	0.9%	28.1%	9	109	8.3%	70.6%	9.1	98.7

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	6	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	5	0	0	21.9

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	2114	1870	53%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	107.9	102.3	+5.5
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	108.1	109.0	-0.9
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-0.2	-6.6	+6.4
Points Scored	4374	3664	+710
Points Allowed	4391	3883	+508
Net Points	-17	-219	+202
Effective FG%	49.9%	48.1%	+1.8%
Effective FG% Allowed	50.8%	50.4%	+0.4%
Assisted Field Goals	57%	54%	+3%
Assisted FG% Allowed	62%	61%	+1%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Shots Blocked	4%	5%	-1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	26.0%	27.0%	-1.0%
Defensive Rebounding	72.7%	70.1%	+2.6%
Total Rebounding	49.4%	48.6%	+0.8%
Stats
Free Throws Made	16	16	+0
Free Throws Attempted	21	22	-1
Free Throws Made by Opp.	15	14	-1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	21	20	-1
Turnovers, on Offense	12	14	+2
Turnovers, on Defense	13	13	+0
Net Turnovers	1	-1	-2
Fouls Committed	18	18	+0
Fouls, Drawn	18	20	-2
Net Fouls	0	2	+2

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts