Steven Adams of the Oklahoma City Thunder, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Steven Adams
Oklahoma City Thunder
2013-2014 NBA Season

More Steven Adams stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
30%	+55	1.1	1.07	2.2	37	39	48.7

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 1.1 2.3 .503 .503 61% 7% 1.0 3.3

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 20% .351   92% 5% .3

Close 52% .474   63% 10% 1.1

Dunk 15% .857   67% 0% .6

Tips 12% .435   0% 4% .2

Inside 80% .541   56% 7% 2.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 58% .546   44% 5% 1.5

11-15 21% .447   82% 8% .4

16-20 10% .368   100% 11% .2

21+ 11% .500   100% 15% .2

Crunch 21% .436   100% 13% .4

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
79	136	58.1	5.5	3.2	234	49	20.9%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
11	21	10	2	44	13	3.4	1.4	1.8

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
143	1154	12.4%	33.4%	190	1197	15.9%	72.7%	28.3	106.1

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
25	31	1	2%	6%	1%	57	2.3	2.8%	71	.80	6.2

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
28	13	26	4	4.1

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Jackson-Fisher-Lamb-Collison-Adams	111	1.04	1.00	9	11	7	61
2	Westbrook-Sefolosha-Durant-Ibaka-Adams	105	1.08	1.24	-38	4	10	28
3	Fisher-Lamb-Jones-Collison-Adams	105	1.01	1.12	-25	8	14	36
4	Fisher-Lamb-Durant-Collison-Adams	74	1.25	1.06	23	12	6	66
5	Westbrook-Durant-Jones-Ibaka-Adams	71	1.30	1.07	32	8	1	88
6	Westbrook-Roberson-Durant-Ibaka-Adams	61	1.11	.81	38	7	1	87
7	Jackson-Lamb-Durant-Collison-Adams	50	1.26	.90	35	15	6	71
8	Jackson-Roberson-Durant-Ibaka-Adams	47	1.12	1.19	-5	1	4	20
9	Jackson-Lamb-Durant-Ibaka-Adams	34	1.02	1.14	-5	9	10	47
10	Westbrook-Jackson-Durant-Ibaka-Adams	27	1.39	1.04	17	6	4	60
11	Jackson-Sefolosha-Durant-Ibaka-Adams	24	1.00	1.26	-9	6	6	50
12	Fisher-Lamb-Durant-Ibaka-Adams	23	.98	1.24	-11	3	7	30
13	Lamb-Roberson-Gomes-Jones-Adams	22	.94	.72	11	2	1	66
14	Fisher-Lamb-Roberson-Jones-Adams	17	.90	.57	11	2	0	100
15	Jackson-Butler-Durant-Ibaka-Adams	15	1.21	1.29	-2	4	4	50
16	Jackson-Lamb-Roberson-Jones-Adams	14	1.11	1.17	-5	1	2	33
17	Jackson-Lamb-Jones-Collison-Adams	14	.79	1.16	-10	0	4	0
18	Westbrook-Lamb-Durant-Ibaka-Adams	14	1.52	1.00	16	4	3	57
19	Jackson-Fisher-Lamb-Durant-Adams	13	.93	.88	3	4	3	57
20	Jackson-Fisher-Butler-Collison-Adams	12	1.32	1.44	-3	1	1	50

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Jackson-Fisher-Lamb-Collison-Adams .388 .413 -13 28% 24%   53% +3%

2 Westbrook-Sefolosha-Durant-Ibaka-Adams .479 .500 +6 32% 31%   49% -3%

3 Fisher-Lamb-Jones-Collison-Adams .455 .503 -9 30% 27%   52% -1%

4 Fisher-Lamb-Durant-Collison-Adams .485 .460 +28 33% 27%   57% 0%

5 Westbrook-Durant-Jones-Ibaka-Adams .545 .456 +7 27% 35%   59% 0%

6 Westbrook-Roberson-Durant-Ibaka-Adams .476 .342 +17 30% 34%   55% -3%

7 Jackson-Lamb-Durant-Collison-Adams .538 .375 +2 38% 25%   61% -1%

8 Jackson-Roberson-Durant-Ibaka-Adams .471 .464 -9 26% 42%   54% -6%

9 Jackson-Lamb-Durant-Ibaka-Adams .491 .444 -4 30% 22%   53% -12%

10 Westbrook-Jackson-Durant-Ibaka-Adams .532 .455 +4 19% 25%   65% +1%

11 Jackson-Sefolosha-Durant-Ibaka-Adams .462 .386 -6 23% 32%   43% -8%

12 Fisher-Lamb-Durant-Ibaka-Adams .485 .535 +5 21% 28%   36% -4%

13 Lamb-Roberson-Gomes-Jones-Adams .462 .444 -15 26% 37%   61% -2%

14 Fisher-Lamb-Roberson-Jones-Adams .379 .206 -1 24% 12%   37% +14%

15 Jackson-Butler-Durant-Ibaka-Adams .476 .519 +15 19% 33%   50% +3%

16 Jackson-Lamb-Roberson-Jones-Adams .423 .542 -4 27% 42%   53% +2%

17 Jackson-Lamb-Jones-Collison-Adams .350 .500 +3 25% 35%   46% -9%

18 Westbrook-Lamb-Durant-Ibaka-Adams .483 .320 -1 38% 40%   62% -7%

19 Jackson-Fisher-Lamb-Durant-Adams .385 .444 -2 46% 33%   66% -2%

20 Jackson-Fisher-Butler-Collison-Adams .684 .600 0 21% 40%   45% 0%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	0%	-24	77.9	163.3	-85.4		5	0%
C	44%	+78	103.3	100.1	3.2	40	36	52%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	14.8	.750	14.8	50%	7.4	.0	.0	3.7	3.7	33.4	34.3
C	7.3	.497	5.4	80%	13.4	1.8	2.9	2.3	8.0	10.4	12.0

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 14.8 .875 .0 50% 18.6 14.8 .0 .0 3.7 26.0 42.6

C 16.1 .536 6.7 50% 11.5 2.4 2.8 1.5 6.1 21.4 17.5

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF .0 -.125 14.8 0% -11.1 -14.8 .0 3.7 .0 7.4 -8.3

C -8.8 -.039 -1.4 30% 1.9 -.6 .0 .8 -1.9 -11.0 -5.5

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
1%	-1	58.0	77.3	-19.3	1	1	50.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 19.3 19.3 1.000 .000 0% 0% 0.0 0.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	19.3	0.0	1	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	%-38.7	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	3	0.0%	33.3%	0	4	0.0%	75.0%	0.0	108.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-57.5

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1196	2763	30%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	111.1	112.2	-1.1
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	107.5	103.9	+3.6
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+3.6	+8.3	-4.7
Points Scored	2568	6137	-3569
Points Allowed	2513	5672	-3159
Net Points	+55	+465	-410
Effective FG%	50.9%	52.5%	-1.6%
Effective FG% Allowed	50.4%	48.1%	+2.4%
Assisted Field Goals	55%	56%	-1%
Assisted FG% Allowed	65%	57%	+8%
Own Shots Blocked	4%	4%	+0%
Shots Blocked	6%	7%	-1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	33.4%	26.7%	+6.7%
Defensive Rebounding	72.7%	72.3%	+0.4%
Total Rebounding	53.1%	49.5%	+3.5%
Stats
Free Throws Made	19	20	-1
Free Throws Attempted	24	24	+0
Free Throws Made by Opp.	17	18	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	23	25	+2
Turnovers, on Offense	16	14	-2
Turnovers, on Defense	14	15	-1
Net Turnovers	-2	1	+3
Fouls Committed	23	22	-1
Fouls, Drawn	21	19	+2
Net Fouls	-2	-3	-1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts