NBA stats
Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Utah Jazz
2013-2014 NBA Season Stats
Jazz home page

Floor Time stats | 5-Man Units | Team Stats | W-L Profiles | By Position

Top Five-Man Floor Units
#
Unit
Min
Off
Def
+/-
W
L
Win%
1
 Burke-Hayward-Jefferson-Williams-Favors 602.4  1.09  1.11  -6   21   22  
48.8
2
 Burke-Hayward-Jefferson-Favors-Kanter 205.8  1.00  1.13  -60   5   13  
27.7
3
 Burke-Burks-Hayward-Williams-Favors 151.6  1.09  1.06  +19   15   14  
51.7
4
 Burke-Hayward-Jefferson-Williams-Kanter 151.6  1.05  1.18  -38   9   11  
45.0
5
 Garrett-Burks-Hayward-Evans-Kanter 133.0  1.12  1.04  +25   13   15  
46.4
6
 Burke-Burks-Hayward-Favors-Kanter 123.1  1.13  1.18  -11   10   9  
52.6
7
 Burke-Burks-Hayward-Evans-Kanter 111.1  1.07  1.17  -28   17   18  
48.5
8
 Burke-Burks-Jefferson-Williams-Favors 108.3  1.08  1.18  -22   4   9  
30.7
9
 Lucas-Hayward-Jefferson-Favors-Kanter 105.0  0.98  1.08  -24   6   9  
40.0
10
 Garrett-Burks-Rush-Evans-Kanter 87.0  1.00  1.07  -18   7   11  
38.8
11
 Garrett-Burks-Jefferson-Evans-Kanter 82.5  0.86  1.10  -41   5   16  
23.8
12
 Burke-Burks-Hayward-Evans-Favors 80.8  1.13  1.09  -2   8   11  
42.1
13
 Burke-Burks-Jefferson-Evans-Kanter 67.7  1.16  1.18  -2   8   10  
44.4
14
 Tinsley-Hayward-Jefferson-Favors-Kanter 64.9  0.94  1.27  -44   0   5  
0.0
15
 Burke-Burks-Hayward-Williams-Kanter 58.8  1.15  1.51  -38   5   15  
25.0
16
 Burks-Hayward-Jefferson-Favors-Kanter 58.6  0.87  1.01  -17   2   3  
40.0
17
 Garrett-Hayward-Jefferson-Williams-Favors 51.1  1.27  1.02  +18   7   5  
58.3
18
 Burke-Hayward-Jefferson-Evans-Kanter 47.9  0.94  1.20  -21   1   6  
14.2
19
 Burke-Burks-Jefferson-Favors-Kanter 41.2  1.21  1.30  -4   4   7  
36.3
20
 Lucas-Burks-Hayward-Evans-Kanter 40.9  1.08  1.07  +4   3   5  
37.5


Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details
#
Unit
eFG
eFGA
FTA
Close
dClose
Reb
T/O
1
 Burke-Hayward-Jefferson-Williams-Favors .461  .463  -33  26%  34%   47.5%  -1% 
2
 Burke-Hayward-Jefferson-Favors-Kanter .453  .516  -12  31%  33%   50.0%  -4% 
3
 Burke-Burks-Hayward-Williams-Favors .467  .433  -10  32%  27%   50.5%  -2% 
4
 Burke-Hayward-Jefferson-Williams-Kanter .424  .510  -12  28%  34%   48.0%  +1% 
5
 Garrett-Burks-Hayward-Evans-Kanter .489  .464  -1  34%  33%   53.5%  +2% 
6
 Burke-Burks-Hayward-Favors-Kanter .467  .474  -4  37%  39%   52.0%  -5% 
7
 Burke-Burks-Hayward-Evans-Kanter .453  .503  -25  36%  32%   51.0%  -1% 
8
 Burke-Burks-Jefferson-Williams-Favors .463  .471  -17  29%  34%   43.5%  0% 
9
 Lucas-Hayward-Jefferson-Favors-Kanter .431  .468  -18  32%  35%   52.0%  -9% 
10
 Garrett-Burks-Rush-Evans-Kanter .430  .447  -8  38%  34%   48.0%  +1% 
11
 Garrett-Burks-Jefferson-Evans-Kanter .362  .443  +10  38%  26%   46.5%  -1% 
12
 Burke-Burks-Hayward-Evans-Favors .486  .457  -14  24%  29%   56.5%  -8% 
13
 Burke-Burks-Jefferson-Evans-Kanter .495  .500  +21  32%  29%   50.0%  +3% 
14
 Tinsley-Hayward-Jefferson-Favors-Kanter .417  .541  -2  31%  41%   48.5%  -5% 
15
 Burke-Burks-Hayward-Williams-Kanter .473  .598  -15  37%  32%   50.0%  -2% 
16
 Burks-Hayward-Jefferson-Favors-Kanter .376  .447  -7  31%  37%   51.0%  -1% 
17
 Garrett-Hayward-Jefferson-Williams-Favors .518  .426  +9  39%  31%   52.5%  -1% 
18
 Burke-Hayward-Jefferson-Evans-Kanter .438  .494  -9  24%  26%   55.0%  -7% 
19
 Burke-Burks-Jefferson-Favors-Kanter .507  .515  -6  31%  21%   51.0%  -6% 
20
 Lucas-Burks-Hayward-Evans-Kanter .425  .475  -2  32%  44%   61.0%  -3% 

    Legend:
  • Min = the total minutes the unit was on the floor.

  • Off = the unit's points per possession.

  • Def = the unit's points per possession allowed.

  • +/- = the team net points for the unit.

  • W = number of games a unit outscored its opponents while on the court.

  • L = number of games a unit was outscored by its opponents while on the court.

  • Win% = the winning percentage for the unit based on Wins versus Losses.
  • eFG = the effective shooting percentage, adjusted for the value of 3-point shots.
  • eFGA = the effective shooting percentage allowed to opponents.
  • FTA = net free throw attempts.
  • Close = the percentage of shots taken from close range.
  • dClose = the percentage of opponents' shots taken from close range.
  • Reb = the rebound percentage for the unit, based on chances.
  • T/O = the net turnover percentage for the unit based on opponent turnovers minus unit turnovers.

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts

Copyright 2010-11 by 82games.com, All Rights Reserved