Malcom Lee of the Minnesota Timberwolves, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Malcom Lee
Minnesota Timberwolves
2012-2013 NBA Season

More Malcom Lee stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
7%	+12	1.02	1	2	9	6	60.0

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 1.8 4.8 .382 .434 72% 8% .8 4.9

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 62% .468   78% 0% 2.8

Close 36% .333   56% 22% 1.1

Dunk 3% 1.000   100% 0% .3

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 38% .379   64% 21% 1.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 36% .444   55% 11% 1.5

11-15 30% .391   63% 4% 1.1

16-20 24% .556   100% 6% 1.3

21+ 11% .250   100% 13% .3

Crunch 34% .462   100% 8% 1.5

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
12	20	60.0	3.3	2.0	86	10	11.6%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
6	7	4	2	19	3	6.3	3.8	3.2

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
15	297	5.1%	34.7%	24	273	8.8%	76.6%	13.8	111.2

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
5	1	0	1%	1%	%	6	1.0	1.3%	15	.40	1.8

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
2	3	5	0	11.9

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Ridnour-Lee-Kirilenko-Love-Pekovic	103	1.04	.98	11	4	2	66
2	Ridnour-Lee-Howard-Love-Pekovic	51	1.11	1.06	5	2	1	66
3	Ridnour-Lee-Kirilenko-Williams-Stiemsma	28	.91	.93	-1	0	1	0
4	Shved-Lee-Budinger-Cunningham-Stiemsma	9	1.00	1.24	-3	1	1	50
5	Shved-Lee-Cunningham-Kirilenko-Stiemsma	8	1.17	1.15	-1	0	1	0
6	Ridnour-Shved-Lee-Love-Pekovic	7	1.28	1.44	-3	0	1	0
7	Ridnour-Lee-Cunningham-Kirilenko-Pekovic	7	1.23	.86	4	1	0	100
8	Shved-Lee-Cunningham-Kirilenko-Amundson	7	1.27	.60	8	1	0	100
9	Conroy-Shved-Lee-Amundson-Stiemsma	6	.36	1.07	-10	0	2	0
10	Ridnour-Lee-Kirilenko-Williams-Pekovic	6	1.23	.92	5	1	0	100
11	Conroy-Shved-Lee-Cunningham-Amundson	6	.50	2.00	-18	0	3	0
12	Shved-Lee-Budinger-Cunningham-Pekovic	5	.50	.90	-5	0	1	0
13	Barea-Shved-Lee-Cunningham-Williams	4	.75	.50	2	1	0	100
14	Shved-Lee-Howard-Cunningham-Amundson	4	1.50	1.14	4	1	0	100
15	Shved-Lee-Kirilenko-Williams-Amundson	3	1.17	1.14	-1	0	1	0
16	Shved-Lee-Cunningham-Kirilenko-Williams	3	1.57	.33	9	1	0	100
17	Ridnour-Lee-Cunningham-Kirilenko-Williams	3	.50	1.00	-3	0	1	0
18	Shved-Lee-Howard-Williams-Amundson	3	1.50	.40	7	1	0	100
19	Conroy-Shved-Lee-Cunningham-Stiemsma	2	.20	1.00	-4	0	1	0
20	Barea-Lee-Cunningham-Kirilenko-Pekovic	2	1.00	1.25	0	0	0	0

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Ridnour-Lee-Kirilenko-Love-Pekovic .425 .464 +11 46% 27%   58% +3%

2 Ridnour-Lee-Howard-Love-Pekovic .511 .518 -1 43% 22%   56% -1%

3 Ridnour-Lee-Kirilenko-Williams-Stiemsma .386 .471 +16 43% 29%   52% 0%

4 Shved-Lee-Budinger-Cunningham-Stiemsma .429 .583 +2 36% 33%   67% -5%

5 Shved-Lee-Cunningham-Kirilenko-Stiemsma .375 .316 +2 31% 26%   48% +7%

6 Ridnour-Shved-Lee-Love-Pekovic .583 .625 +2 33% 38%   60% -22%

7 Ridnour-Lee-Cunningham-Kirilenko-Pekovic .727 .400 -4 36% 40%   50% -1%

8 Shved-Lee-Cunningham-Kirilenko-Amundson .375 .250 +11 50% 50%   56% +22%

9 Conroy-Shved-Lee-Amundson-Stiemsma .091 .556 -2 36% 11%   54% 0%

10 Ridnour-Lee-Kirilenko-Williams-Pekovic .583 .357 +2 50% 14%   59% -15%

11 Conroy-Shved-Lee-Cunningham-Amundson .167 .800 -2 33% 40%   70% -16%

12 Shved-Lee-Budinger-Cunningham-Pekovic .400 .273 -3 60% 27%   38% -37%

13 Barea-Shved-Lee-Cunningham-Williams .100 .250 +3 30% 38%   69% -13%

14 Shved-Lee-Howard-Cunningham-Amundson .833 .571 0 17% 29%   25% +3%

15 Shved-Lee-Kirilenko-Williams-Amundson .333 .375 +3 33% 25%   55% -19%

16 Shved-Lee-Cunningham-Kirilenko-Williams .571 .333 +2 0% 33%   67% +52%

17 Ridnour-Lee-Cunningham-Kirilenko-Williams .250 .600 +2 50% 80%   67% -17%

18 Shved-Lee-Howard-Williams-Amundson .600 .250 +4 40% 0%   63% +20%

19 Conroy-Shved-Lee-Cunningham-Stiemsma 0 .400 +2 33% 40%   50% -20%

20 Barea-Lee-Cunningham-Kirilenko-Pekovic .400 .667 0 40% 33%   0% +50%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG	6%	+43	96.5	88.3	8.2	10	3	76%
SF	0%	-33	74.3	123.9	-49.5		5	0%
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG	12.1	.462	3.0	33%	5.4	3.4	1.7	.9	4.7	12.9	9.3
SF	17.0	.273	6.2	63%	15.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	7.7	13.9	13.1
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG 18.3 .617 4.9 24% 5.4 2.4 3.0 .6 1.7 25.9 19.1

SF 20.1 .654 3.1 23% 13.9 .0 1.5 1.5 7.7 29.4 27.2

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG -6.2 -.156 -1.9 9% .0 .9 1.3 .4 -3.0 -13.1 -9.8

SF -3.1 -.381 3.1 40% 1.5 1.5 .0 .0 .0 -15.5 -14.0

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
2%	-1	115.8	130.3	-14.5	0	1	0.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 14.5 14.5 1.000 .000 0% 0% 0.0 0.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	14.5	0.0	1	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
1	0	0	0	1	0	1.0	%-14.5	14.5

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	5	0.0%	60.0%	0	4	0.0%	50.0%	0.0	110.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-21.2

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	288	3657	7%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	104.2	104.4	-0.2
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	100.5	106.5	-6.0
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+3.7	-2.2	+5.8
Points Scored	565	7286	-6721
Points Allowed	553	7492	-6939
Net Points	+12	-206	+218
Effective FG%	46.8%	47.3%	-0.5%
Effective FG% Allowed	50.0%	51.2%	-1.2%
Assisted Field Goals	66%	62%	+4%
Assisted FG% Allowed	57%	58%	-1%
Own Shots Blocked	9%	6%	+3%
Shots Blocked	6%	5%	+1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	34.7%	30.0%	+4.7%
Defensive Rebounding	76.6%	71.4%	+5.2%
Total Rebounding	55.6%	50.7%	+4.9%
Stats
Free Throws Made	18	18	+0
Free Throws Attempted	26	24	+2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	12	15	+3
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	17	20	+3
Turnovers, on Offense	15	14	-1
Turnovers, on Defense	15	15	+0
Net Turnovers	0	1	+1
Fouls Committed	17	18	+1
Fouls, Drawn	23	22	+1
Net Fouls	6	4	-2

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts