NBA stats
Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Utah Jazz
2012-2013 NBA Season Stats
Jazz home page

Floor Time stats | 5-Man Units | Team Stats | W-L Profiles | By Position

Top Five-Man Floor Units
#
Unit
Min
Off
Def
+/-
W
L
Win%
1
 Tinsley-Foye-Ma.Williams-Millsap-Jefferson 453.9  1.04  1.12  -63   9   15  
37.5
2
 Mo.Williams-Foye-Hayward-Millsap-Jefferson 350.0  1.12  1.16  -24   10   21  
32.2
3
 Mo.Williams-Foye-Ma.Williams-Millsap-Jefferson 205.1  1.01  1.09  -33   7   11  
38.8
4
 Mo.Williams-Hayward-Ma.Williams-Millsap-Jefferson 191.4  0.97  1.05  -28   7   11  
38.8
5
 Watson-Hayward-Carroll-Favors-Kanter 103.1  1.00  1.02  +8   8   7  
53.3
6
 Watson-Burks-Hayward-Favors-Kanter 99.1  0.93  1.10  -31   5   9  
35.7
7
 Mo.Williams-Foye-Hayward-Favors-Jefferson 93.1  1.05  1.02  +9   10   9  
52.6
8
 Mo.Williams-Foye-Carroll-Millsap-Jefferson 85.4  1.09  1.09  -2   3   6  
33.3
9
 Tinsley-Foye-Carroll-Millsap-Jefferson 61.0  1.08  1.07  +1   4   3  
57.1
10
 Watson-Burks-Carroll-Favors-Kanter 52.0  1.02  1.01  -1   4   2  
66.6
11
 Tinsley-Hayward-Ma.Williams-Millsap-Jefferson 51.5  1.14  0.86  +29   4   4  
50.0
12
 Mo.Williams-Foye-Carroll-Favors-Jefferson 47.4  0.95  1.13  -16   2   5  
28.5
13
 Watson-Foye-Ma.Williams-Millsap-Jefferson 46.8  1.01  0.92  +9   8   4  
66.6
14
 Tinsley-Foye-Ma.Williams-Favors-Jefferson 43.6  1.01  1.04  -5   8   9  
47.0
15
 Tinsley-Foye-Hayward-Millsap-Jefferson 43.2  0.95  1.24  -28   2   6  
25.0
16
 Tinsley-Foye-Carroll-Favors-Kanter 42.2  1.04  0.97  +5   3   3  
50.0
17
 Tinsley-Hayward-Carroll-Favors-Kanter 41.9  1.25  1.00  +17   5   3  
62.5
18
 Mo.Williams-Foye-Millsap-Favors-Jefferson 38.7  1.06  1.16  -11   2   3  
40.0
19
 Burks-Hayward-Ma.Williams-Favors-Jefferson 38.7  1.09  0.93  +15   4   4  
50.0
20
 Mo.Williams-Hayward-Ma.Williams-Favors-Jefferson 37.9  1.03  0.92  +8   5   6  
45.4


Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details
#
Unit
eFG
eFGA
FTA
Close
dClose
Reb
T/O
1
 Tinsley-Foye-Ma.Williams-Millsap-Jefferson .446  .484  -10  26%  32%   45.0%  +1% 
2
 Mo.Williams-Foye-Hayward-Millsap-Jefferson .484  .518  -52  26%  34%   46.0%  +5% 
3
 Mo.Williams-Foye-Ma.Williams-Millsap-Jefferson .436  .444  -29  21%  31%   46.5%  0% 
4
 Mo.Williams-Hayward-Ma.Williams-Millsap-Jefferson .400  .450  -1  29%  34%   53.0%  0% 
5
 Watson-Hayward-Carroll-Favors-Kanter .427  .456  +12  32%  31%   55.5%  +1% 
6
 Watson-Burks-Hayward-Favors-Kanter .383  .456  -3  33%  32%   50.0%  +1% 
7
 Mo.Williams-Foye-Hayward-Favors-Jefferson .459  .430  -12  33%  40%   48.5%  -4% 
8
 Mo.Williams-Foye-Carroll-Millsap-Jefferson .510  .529  -8  24%  34%   48.5%  +3% 
9
 Tinsley-Foye-Carroll-Millsap-Jefferson .462  .516  +7  29%  31%   56.0%  +2% 
10
 Watson-Burks-Carroll-Favors-Kanter .494  .467  -2  33%  31%   51.5%  -3% 
11
 Tinsley-Hayward-Ma.Williams-Millsap-Jefferson .526  .378  +16  23%  32%   52.0%  -3% 
12
 Mo.Williams-Foye-Carroll-Favors-Jefferson .382  .513  -12  24%  38%   51.0%  +1% 
13
 Watson-Foye-Ma.Williams-Millsap-Jefferson .494  .462  +4  28%  13%   47.0%  +4% 
14
 Tinsley-Foye-Ma.Williams-Favors-Jefferson .410  .387  -16  28%  35%   49.0%  +1% 
15
 Tinsley-Foye-Hayward-Millsap-Jefferson .369  .466  -9  31%  34%   42.0%  -4% 
16
 Tinsley-Foye-Carroll-Favors-Kanter .485  .423  -1  30%  34%   54.0%  -8% 
17
 Tinsley-Hayward-Carroll-Favors-Kanter .561  .408  +1  27%  39%   56.0%  -3% 
18
 Mo.Williams-Foye-Millsap-Favors-Jefferson .373  .492  -12  31%  22%   50.0%  +1% 
19
 Burks-Hayward-Ma.Williams-Favors-Jefferson .448  .381  +8  39%  27%   57.0%  +1% 
20
 Mo.Williams-Hayward-Ma.Williams-Favors-Jefferson .460  .418  +13  27%  21%   58.0%  -4% 

    Legend:
  • Min = the total minutes the unit was on the floor.

  • Off = the unit's points per possession.

  • Def = the unit's points per possession allowed.

  • +/- = the team net points for the unit.

  • W = number of games a unit outscored its opponents while on the court.

  • L = number of games a unit was outscored by its opponents while on the court.

  • Win% = the winning percentage for the unit based on Wins versus Losses.
  • eFG = the effective shooting percentage, adjusted for the value of 3-point shots.
  • eFGA = the effective shooting percentage allowed to opponents.
  • FTA = net free throw attempts.
  • Close = the percentage of shots taken from close range.
  • dClose = the percentage of opponents' shots taken from close range.
  • Reb = the rebound percentage for the unit, based on chances.
  • T/O = the net turnover percentage for the unit based on opponent turnovers minus unit turnovers.

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts

Copyright 2010-11 by 82games.com, All Rights Reserved