Luol Deng of the Chicago Bulls, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Luol Deng
Chicago Bulls
2011-2012 NBA Season

More Luol Deng stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
66%	+377	1.08	0.98	8.5	41	12	77.4

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 5.8 14.0 .412 .464 65% 5% 2.4 15.3

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 75% .413   70% 5% 8.6

Close 22% .583   58% 9% 3.6

Dunk 2% 1.000   67% 0% .4

Tips 1% .700   0% 0% .3

Inside 25% .616   56% 8% 4.3

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 35% .556   56% 4% 5.5

11-15 21% .484   75% 4% 2.8

16-20 27% .376   70% 7% 2.9

21+ 17% .388   67% 7% 1.8

Crunch 44% .380   69% 7% 4.6

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
127	165	77.0	3.7	2.9	825	70	8.5%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
32	44	59	22	157	49	3.2	4.1	3.5

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
77	2078	3.7%	34.5%	273	2160	12.6%	73.0%	16.3	107.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
21	15	0	1%	2%	%	36	.8	1.0%	39	.92	1.9

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
11	49	36	0	15.0

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Rose-Brewer-Deng-Boozer-Noah	289	1.13	.96	101	14	7	66
2	Watson-Brewer-Deng-Boozer-Noah	269	1.03	1.04	-8	8	12	40
3	Rose-Hamilton-Deng-Boozer-Noah	253	1.07	1.01	27	10	3	76
4	Lucas-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Asik	157	1.15	.79	95	18	8	69
5	Watson-Hamilton-Deng-Boozer-Noah	111	1.14	1.06	17	5	4	55
6	Watson-Brewer-Deng-Gibson-Asik	78	.94	.89	6	13	11	54
7	Rose-Korver-Deng-Boozer-Noah	71	1.06	1.00	24	8	5	61
8	Watson-Korver-Deng-Boozer-Noah	61	.75	1.21	-50	4	12	25
9	Watson-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Asik	60	.97	1.07	-11	6	10	37
10	Rose-Brewer-Deng-Gibson-Noah	52	1.16	.88	13	10	7	58
11	Rose-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Noah	48	1.14	.96	24	12	3	80
12	Lucas-Brewer-Deng-Boozer-Noah	44	.92	1.06	-10	3	2	60
13	Rose-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Asik	42	1.12	.97	11	6	4	60
14	Lucas-Korver-Deng-Boozer-Noah	42	1.25	.91	27	6	5	54
15	Lucas-Brewer-Deng-Gibson-Asik	34	.97	.97	-1	5	7	41
16	Rose-Brewer-Deng-Gibson-Asik	30	1.08	.85	1	8	6	57
17	Watson-Hamilton-Deng-Boozer-Asik	28	1.08	1.04	1	2	2	50
18	Watson-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Noah	21	1.11	1.08	0	3	4	42
19	Lucas-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Noah	20	.97	.86	5	6	5	54
20	Watson-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Boozer	19	1.17	1.00	12	3	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Rose-Brewer-Deng-Boozer-Noah .514 .429 +41 35% 37%   52% -2%

2 Watson-Brewer-Deng-Boozer-Noah .455 .460 +34 38% 33%   51% -3%

3 Rose-Hamilton-Deng-Boozer-Noah .461 .441 -8 39% 32%   55% -2%

4 Lucas-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Asik .479 .331 0 31% 32%   56% +2%

5 Watson-Hamilton-Deng-Boozer-Noah .510 .474 +5 30% 30%   57% -2%

6 Watson-Brewer-Deng-Gibson-Asik .405 .353 -10 26% 29%   49% -2%

7 Rose-Korver-Deng-Boozer-Noah .400 .440 +7 32% 33%   59% +2%

8 Watson-Korver-Deng-Boozer-Noah .318 .525 -6 37% 34%   48% -2%

9 Watson-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Asik .418 .455 -5 28% 34%   53% -8%

10 Rose-Brewer-Deng-Gibson-Noah .506 .363 +2 36% 33%   52% 0%

11 Rose-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Noah .488 .373 -6 38% 33%   48% -3%

12 Lucas-Brewer-Deng-Boozer-Noah .431 .519 +8 33% 39%   53% -7%

13 Rose-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Asik .408 .455 +4 41% 18%   62% +2%

14 Lucas-Korver-Deng-Boozer-Noah .476 .410 -17 33% 26%   57% +8%

15 Lucas-Brewer-Deng-Gibson-Asik .444 .481 +4 26% 33%   53% +1%

16 Rose-Brewer-Deng-Gibson-Asik .422 .365 +14 40% 19%   61% -7%

17 Watson-Hamilton-Deng-Boozer-Asik .479 .423 +3 29% 29%   39% +9%

18 Watson-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Noah .424 .375 +3 24% 28%   50% -3%

19 Lucas-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Noah .400 .300 0 20% 23%   58% -10%

20 Watson-Korver-Deng-Gibson-Boozer .455 .417 -3 30% 17%   52% +2%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF	79%	+309	94.1	86.7	7.3	36	17	67%
PF	4%	+68	127.4	95.5	31.8	15	7	68%
C	0%	0	.0	.0	.0			0%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF	16.7	.457	3.4	24%	7.6	3.5	2.2	.8	1.8	17.8	12.6
PF	24.3	.567	10.8	34%	14.0	4.2	.9	1.4	3.3	36.1	35.8
C	.0	.000	.0	0%	.0	.0	.0	.0	.0	.0	.0

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF 16.1   .456   2.8   27% 6.4   3.4   2.3   .8   2.7   16.8   11.3

PF 15.0   .469   7.5   37% 12.2   2.3   1.4   1.4   6.1   19.7   18.9

C 240.0   .000   .0   0% .0   .0   .0   .0   .0   .0   .0

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF .6 .000 .6 -3% 1.2 .1 .1 .0 1.0 1.0 1.3

PF 9.4 .099 3.3 -3% 1.9 1.9 .5 .0 2.8 16.4 16.9

C -240.0 .000 .0 0% .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
72%	+41	124.7	95.3	29.4	14	6	70.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 7.9 13.6 .579 .658 64% 16% 9.3 27.2

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 63% .625   67% 17% 0.7

Close 37% .714   60% 14% 0.4

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 37% .714   60% 14% 0.4

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 47% .444   50% 11% 0.3

11-15 16% .667   100% 33% 0.2

16-20 21% 1.250   50% 0% 0.4

21+ 16% .500   100% 33% 0.1

Crunch 37% .929   60% 14% 0.6

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
13	19	68.4	13.6	9.3	23	4	17.4%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	2	0.0	-2.9	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
5	80	6.3%	45.0%	6	65	9.2%	72.3%	15.5	117.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	1	0	1%	4%	0%	2	1.4	1.9%	2	1.00	4.7

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	2	0	0	7.2

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	2128	1058	66%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	108.0	110.5	-2.5
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	98.3	100.0	-1.7
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+9.8	+10.5	-0.8
Points Scored	4242	2117	+2125
Points Allowed	3865	1954	+1911
Net Points	+377	+163	+214
Effective FG%	49.2%	48.7%	+0.4%
Effective FG% Allowed	45.3%	44.2%	+1.2%
Assisted Field Goals	60%	65%	-5%
Assisted FG% Allowed	54%	53%	+1%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	6%	-1%
Shots Blocked	6%	7%	-1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	34.5%	36.3%	-1.8%
Defensive Rebounding	73.0%	69.2%	+3.8%
Total Rebounding	53.7%	52.7%	+1.0%
Stats
Free Throws Made	14	16	-2
Free Throws Attempted	19	23	-4
Free Throws Made by Opp.	13	15	+2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	18	21	+3
Turnovers, on Offense	14	13	-1
Turnovers, on Defense	13	13	+0
Net Turnovers	-1	0	+1
Fouls Committed	16	18	+2
Fouls, Drawn	17	17	+0
Net Fouls	1	-1	-2

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts