Ryan Hollins of the Boston Celtics, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Ryan Hollins
Boston Celtics
2011-2012 NBA Season

More Ryan Hollins stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
5%	+9	0.93	0.88	2.7	6	4	60.0

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 1.2 1.9 .643 .643 78% 4% .4 2.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 43% .583   100% 0% .9

Close 29% .375   67% 13% .4

Dunk 29% 1.000   63% 0% 1.1

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 57% .688   64% 6% 1.5

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 54% .800   67% 0% 1.6

11-15 21% .667   100% 17% .5

16-20 11% .333   100% 0% .1

21+ 14% .250   100% 0% .1

Crunch 25% .286   100% 0% .3

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
6	20	30.0	6.0	1.8	37	9	24.3%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
1	1	1	0	3	1	3.0	.6	.9

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
9	143	6.3%	25.2%	17	168	10.1%	70.2%	16.4	95.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
4	1	0	2%	1%	%	5	1.5	1.9%	10	.50	2.9

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
7	1	3	0	2.7

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Bradley-Dooling-Pavlovic-Bass-Hollins	14	1.00	.83	4	2	1	66
2	Rondo-Bradley-Pietrus-Bass-Hollins	12	.91	.91	1	1	1	50
3	Bradley-Moore-Daniels-Bass-Hollins	8	1.00	.82	4	1	1	50
4	Bradley-Dooling-Pierce-Bass-Hollins	8	1.00	1.14	-2	0	1	0
5	Rondo-Bradley-Pierce-Bass-Hollins	8	.94	1.11	-4	1	1	50
6	Moore-Daniels-Pavlovic-Johnson-Hollins	8	.75	.93	-4	1	1	50
7	Bradley-Moore-Pavlovic-Johnson-Hollins	7	.94	.47	9	2	0	100
8	Bradley-Dooling-Daniels-Bass-Hollins	6	1.09	1.33	-4	0	1	0
9	Rondo-Dooling-Pavlovic-Johnson-Hollins	5	.64	.80	-1	0	1	0
10	Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Bass-Hollins	5	1.08	1.09	1	1	1	50
11	Bradley-Pavlovic-Pierce-Bass-Hollins	5	.00	.75	-9	0	1	0
12	Rondo-Bradley-Pierce-Garnett-Hollins	4	.64	1.00	-3	0	1	0
13	Bradley-Dooling-Daniels-Garnett-Hollins	4	.50	1.14	-4	1	1	50
14	Bradley-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Hollins	4	1.40	2.00	-7	0	1	0
15	Bradley-Allen-Pavlovic-Garnett-Hollins	3	1.29	.67	5	1	0	100
16	Bradley-Daniels-Pierce-Bass-Hollins	3	.86	.67	2	1	0	100
17	Dooling-Daniels-Pietrus-Pavlovic-Hollins	3	1.20	.83	1	1	0	100
18	Bradley-Daniels-Pavlovic-Bass-Hollins	3	1.14	.67	4	1	0	100
19	Moore-Daniels-Pavlovic-Garnett-Hollins	3	1.43	1.00	3	1	0	100
20	Rondo-Dooling-Pierce-Bass-Hollins	3	2.00	.50	9	1	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Bradley-Dooling-Pavlovic-Bass-Hollins .435 .375 +2 22% 29%   49% +4%

2 Rondo-Bradley-Pietrus-Bass-Hollins .391 .348 -2 17% 43%   34% +14%

3 Bradley-Moore-Daniels-Bass-Hollins .467 .429 +8 20% 36%   55% +17%

4 Bradley-Dooling-Pierce-Bass-Hollins .556 .467 +4 22% 33%   31% -7%

5 Rondo-Bradley-Pierce-Bass-Hollins .583 .588 +2 17% 47%   29% -1%

6 Moore-Daniels-Pavlovic-Johnson-Hollins .400 .308 -2 40% 31%   34% +12%

7 Bradley-Moore-Pavlovic-Johnson-Hollins .533 .154 -6 33% 38%   50% -5%

8 Bradley-Dooling-Daniels-Bass-Hollins .600 .667 -3 10% 44%   46% +7%

9 Rondo-Dooling-Pavlovic-Johnson-Hollins .375 .125 -2 38% 25%   58% -17%

10 Rondo-Allen-Pierce-Bass-Hollins .500 .556 +1 30% 22%   46% +1%

11 Bradley-Pavlovic-Pierce-Bass-Hollins 0 .500 -1 14% 25%   25% +14%

12 Rondo-Bradley-Pierce-Garnett-Hollins .375 .400 +2 13% 10%   44% +2%

13 Bradley-Dooling-Daniels-Garnett-Hollins .250 .600 -3 25% 20%   32% +16%

14 Bradley-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Hollins .500 .625 -1 0% 38%   42% -20%

15 Bradley-Allen-Pavlovic-Garnett-Hollins .500 .500 +3 50% 0%   67% +19%

16 Bradley-Daniels-Pierce-Bass-Hollins .400 .400 +2 20% 80%   50% +5%

17 Dooling-Daniels-Pietrus-Pavlovic-Hollins .400 .200 -2 20% 20%   38% +16%

18 Bradley-Daniels-Pavlovic-Bass-Hollins .571 .500 0 43% 25%   100% +5%

19 Moore-Daniels-Pavlovic-Garnett-Hollins .571 .400 -1 29% 40%   50% +14%

20 Rondo-Dooling-Pierce-Bass-Hollins .800 .200 +1 0% 20%   40% +16%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	0%	+9	128.0	12.8	115.2	2		100%
C	6%	0	80.8	80.8	.0	6	5	54%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	12.8	1.000	25.6	0%	25.6	12.8	12.8	.0	12.8	38.4	37.2
C	8.3	.630	5.5	59%	7.4	.6	3.1	1.5	6.8	12.0	6.2

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 12.8 .000 .0 0% .0 .0 .0 12.8 12.8 .0 .0

C 15.7 .373 4.0 56% 11.7 3.4 4.3 2.1 2.5 14.1 8.0

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF .0 1.000 25.6 0% 25.6 12.8 -12.8 -12.8 .0 38.4 37.2

C -7.4 .257 1.5 3% -4.3 -2.8 1.2 -.6 -4.3 -2.1 -1.8

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
3%	-3	65.7	98.6	-32.9	0	1	0.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 11.0 11.0 1.000 .000 0% 0% 0.0 0.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	11.0	0.0	1	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	%-21.9	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	3	0.0%	33.3%	0	2	0.0%	100.0%	0.0	133.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-32.4

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	160	3027	5%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	93.4	102.7	-9.3
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	88.6	100.0	-11.4
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+4.8	+2.7	+2.1
Points Scored	273	5789	-5516
Points Allowed	264	5632	-5368
Net Points	+9	+157	-148
Effective FG%	48.0%	49.7%	-1.7%
Effective FG% Allowed	42.3%	45.4%	-3.1%
Assisted Field Goals	58%	66%	-8%
Assisted FG% Allowed	64%	55%	+9%
Own Shots Blocked	8%	5%	+3%
Shots Blocked	4%	6%	-2%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	25.2%	23.0%	+2.1%
Defensive Rebounding	70.2%	69.7%	+0.6%
Total Rebounding	47.7%	46.3%	+1.4%
Stats
Free Throws Made	10	15	-5
Free Throws Attempted	17	19	-2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	13	17	+4
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	20	22	+2
Turnovers, on Offense	17	14	-3
Turnovers, on Defense	18	15	+3
Net Turnovers	1	1	+0
Fouls Committed	20	19	-1
Fouls, Drawn	15	18	-3
Net Fouls	-5	-1	+4

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts