Samuel Dalembert of the Sacramento Kings, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Samuel Dalembert
Sacramento Kings
2010-2011 NBA Season

More Samuel Dalembert stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
48%	-253	1.04	1.09	-6.3	26	51	33.8

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 3.3 7.1 .473 .473 57% 6% 1.4 8.1

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 55% .419   65% 4% 3.3

Close 29% .475   51% 13% 1.9

Dunk 8% .896   70% 2% 1.1

Tips 8% .383   0% 0% .4

Inside 45% .537   50% 9% 3.5

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 45% .518   50% 5% 3.3

11-15 21% .483   66% 5% 1.5

16-20 24% .425   65% 10% 1.4

21+ 11% .367   59% 5% .6

Crunch 34% .407   63% 8% 2.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
108	148	73.0	3.7	2.7	630	63	10.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
12	30	19	6	67	39	1.7	.6	1.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
213	1924	11.1%	32.1%	444	1894	23.4%	71.6%	34.5	103.7

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
81	36	0	3%	4%	%	117	2.9	3.5%	121	.97	5.6

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
29	39	53	11	4.4

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Udrih-Thornton-Garcia-Cousins-Dalembert	176	1.04	1.07	-9	5	7	41
2	Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Landry-Dalembert	154	1.09	1.11	-12	13	15	46
3	Thornton-Evans-Garcia-Cousins-Dalembert	82	1.08	1.15	-13	3	4	42
4	Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Cousins-Dalembert	65	1.04	.89	24	8	4	66
5	Head-Evans-Greene-Landry-Dalembert	59	.97	.86	10	4	1	80
6	Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Thompson-Dalembert	57	1.14	1.09	-1	6	9	40
7	Udrih-Evans-Garcia-Landry-Dalembert	57	1.19	1.06	12	8	3	72
8	Udrih-Thornton-Garcia-Thompson-Dalembert	54	1.04	.98	5	6	6	50
9	Udrih-Taylor-Casspi-Thompson-Dalembert	52	1.16	1.10	4	4	3	57
10	Udrih-Evans-Greene-Landry-Dalembert	47	.99	1.07	-8	4	6	40
11	Head-Thornton-Garcia-Cousins-Dalembert	40	1.11	1.09	2	2	1	66
12	Udrih-Evans-Greene-Thompson-Dalembert	40	1.01	.91	11	7	8	46
13	Udrih-Thornton-Greene-Thompson-Dalembert	38	1.11	1.20	-7	3	6	33
14	Head-Evans-Greene-Thompson-Dalembert	32	.91	1.10	-12	2	1	66
15	Udrih-Thornton-Greene-Cousins-Dalembert	32	1.12	1.27	-12	2	3	40
16	Udrih-Thornton-Evans-Thompson-Dalembert	29	1.08	1.08	-1	2	4	33
17	Udrih-Thornton-Casspi-Cousins-Dalembert	29	.83	.84	2	2	4	33
18	Jeter-Evans-Casspi-Landry-Dalembert	28	.81	1.24	-28	3	9	25
19	Udrih-Head-Casspi-Thompson-Dalembert	27	1.15	1.10	1	3	2	60
20	Udrih-Thornton-Evans-Cousins-Dalembert	25	.93	.95	-4	1	4	20

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Udrih-Thornton-Garcia-Cousins-Dalembert .450 .473 -30 38% 36%   53% -3%

2 Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Landry-Dalembert .443 .479 -26 32% 28%   54% 0%

3 Thornton-Evans-Garcia-Cousins-Dalembert .504 .514 -8 33% 41%   45% -1%

4 Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Cousins-Dalembert .462 .456 +29 33% 31%   54% +5%

5 Head-Evans-Greene-Landry-Dalembert .430 .356 -8 34% 29%   53% -7%

6 Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Thompson-Dalembert .476 .445 -11 21% 35%   55% -6%

7 Udrih-Evans-Garcia-Landry-Dalembert .465 .443 +4 28% 25%   55% 0%

8 Udrih-Thornton-Garcia-Thompson-Dalembert .462 .455 -16 22% 27%   54% +5%

9 Udrih-Taylor-Casspi-Thompson-Dalembert .521 .455 -7 39% 33%   53% -6%

10 Udrih-Evans-Greene-Landry-Dalembert .452 .500 -6 26% 38%   56% -10%

11 Head-Thornton-Garcia-Cousins-Dalembert .479 .524 -6 18% 27%   58% -2%

12 Udrih-Evans-Greene-Thompson-Dalembert .421 .415 -4 32% 29%   58% 0%

13 Udrih-Thornton-Greene-Thompson-Dalembert .464 .493 +8 26% 24%   56% +2%

14 Head-Evans-Greene-Thompson-Dalembert .468 .509 +4 21% 25%   46% -3%

15 Udrih-Thornton-Greene-Cousins-Dalembert .411 .615 +7 36% 46%   62% 0%

16 Udrih-Thornton-Evans-Thompson-Dalembert .393 .382 -2 27% 16%   52% -2%

17 Udrih-Thornton-Casspi-Cousins-Dalembert .442 .422 +5 21% 27%   44% +3%

18 Jeter-Evans-Casspi-Landry-Dalembert .333 .583 -1 29% 35%   45% -3%

19 Udrih-Head-Casspi-Thompson-Dalembert .522 .458 +4 37% 17%   59% -6%

20 Udrih-Thornton-Evans-Cousins-Dalembert .409 .422 -1 32% 31%   58% -7%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C	48%	-253	96.9	103.2	-6.3	26	50	34%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF
C	14.1	.473	3.7	45%	16.3	1.7	3.3	2.9	5.6	16.0	14.8

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF

C 12.6 .503 5.2 50% 11.9 2.9 2.2 2.0 4.9 16.0 14.7

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF

C 1.4 -.030 -1.5 -5% 4.4 -1.2 -1.0 .9 -.7 .0 .0

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
48%	-24	89.2	101.0	-11.8	13	18	41.9%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 4.9 8.3 .588 .588 40% 6% 6.4 16.2

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 24% .500   50% 0% 0.1

Close 53% .667   50% 11% 0.4

Dunk 6% 1.000   0% 0% 0.1

Tips 18% .333   0% 0% 0.1

Inside 76% .615   38% 8% 0.5

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 59% .500   20% 0% 0.3

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 29% .600   67% 20% 0.2

21+ 12% 1.000   50% 0% 0.1

Crunch 41% .714   60% 14% 0.3

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
13	17	76.5	8.3	6.4	22	5	22.7%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	1	0	1	1	1.0	0.0	0.5

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
15	101	14.9%	37.6%	30	123	24.4%	62.6%	39.2	100.2

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
5	1	0	4%	3%	0%	6	2.9	3.4%	9	0.67	5.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
3	1	2	1	1.8

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	1936	2033	48%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	104.9	104.5	+0.4
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	109.6	111.2	-1.6
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-4.7	-6.7	+2.0
Points Scored	3910	4241	-331
Points Allowed	4163	4426	-263
Net Points	-253	-185	-68
Effective FG%	48.3%	47.6%	+0.7%
Effective FG% Allowed	50.5%	52.1%	-1.6%
Assisted Field Goals	53%	53%	+0%
Assisted FG% Allowed	54%	54%	+0%
Own Shots Blocked	6%	7%	-1%
Shots Blocked	6%	4%	+2%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	32.1%	32.4%	-0.4%
Defensive Rebounding	71.6%	71.0%	+0.6%
Total Rebounding	51.9%	51.7%	+0.1%
Stats
Free Throws Made	17	18	-1
Free Throws Attempted	22	25	-3
Free Throws Made by Opp.	18	20	+2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	24	26	+2
Turnovers, on Offense	16	15	-1
Turnovers, on Defense	13	15	-2
Net Turnovers	-3	0	+3
Fouls Committed	20	22	+2
Fouls, Drawn	19	22	-3
Net Fouls	-1	0	+1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts