Jason Williams of the Orlando Magic, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Jason Williams
Orlando Magic
2010-2011 NBA Season

More Jason Williams stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
4%	+35	1.04	0.94	9.8	9	5	64.3

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game .8 2.4 .342 .434 62% 0% .0 2.1

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 89% .426   55% 0% 1.8

Close 11% .500   100% 0% .3

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 11% .500   100% 0% .3

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 45% .206   100% 0% .4

11-15 37% .571   33% 0% 1.0

16-20 8% .000   0% 0% .0

21+ 11% 1.250   75% 0% .6

Crunch 18% .714   60% 0% .6

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	.0	.3	.0	38	0	.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
6	11	5	2	24	6	4.0	6.4	6.7

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
3	170	1.8%	21.8%	19	175	10.9%	74.9%	12.6	96.6

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	%	%	%	0	.0	.0%	1	.00	.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
1	6	4	0	13.5

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Williams-Redick-Pietrus-Bass-Gortat	20	.78	.81	-2	2	2	50
2	Williams-Redick-Q.Richardson-Bass-Gortat	12	1.27	.88	6	2	0	100
3	Williams-Carter-Q.Richardson-Bass-Allen	9	1.27	1.07	2	1	1	50
4	Williams-Redick-Pietrus-Bass-Howard	7	1.15	1.01	4	2	0	100
5	Williams-Redick-Lewis-Bass-Howard	7	.46	1.08	-11	0	4	0
6	Williams-Carter-Lewis-Bass-Allen	7	1.37	.78	7	2	0	100
7	Williams-Redick-Q.Richardson-Gortat-Howard	6	1.18	1.36	-1	0	1	0
8	Duhon-Williams-Pietrus-Bass-Gortat	6	.91	.93	-1	0	1	0
9	Williams-Q.Richardson-Lewis-Bass-Allen	5	1.48	1.20	2	1	0	100
10	Williams-Q.Richardson-Pietrus-Lewis-Gortat	5	.91	1.22	-4	0	2	0
11	Williams-Redick-Carter-Lewis-Howard	5	1.18	.70	5	1	0	100
12	Williams-Pietrus-Anderson-Bass-Gortat	4	.97	1.08	-1	0	1	0
13	Duhon-Williams-Q.Richardson-Clark-Anderson	4	1.48	.60	7	1	0	100
14	Williams-Carter-Q.Richardson-Bass-Gortat	4	1.19	.59	9	3	0	100
15	Williams-Redick-Pietrus-Lewis-Gortat	4	.87	1.75	-7	0	3	0
16	Williams-Redick-Carter-Bass-Gortat	4	1.81	.51	8	2	0	100
17	Williams-Redick-Q.Richardson-Allen-Gortat	3	1.13	.62	1	1	0	100
18	Williams-Carter-Pietrus-Bass-Gortat	3	.80	1.00	-3	0	1	0
19	Williams-Redick-Lewis-Gortat-Howard	3	.54	1.67	-6	0	1	0
20	Williams-Redick-Lewis-Bass-Gortat	3	1.16	.59	4	2	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Williams-Redick-Pietrus-Bass-Gortat .364 .405 +2 18% 35%   42% +4%

2 Williams-Redick-Q.Richardson-Bass-Gortat .476 .421 +1 14% 16%   51% +19%

3 Williams-Carter-Q.Richardson-Bass-Allen .462 .438 +4 23% 25%   41% +10%

4 Williams-Redick-Pietrus-Bass-Howard .500 .545 +13 60% 27%   72% -5%

5 Williams-Redick-Lewis-Bass-Howard .250 .429 -3 25% 36%   44% -7%

6 Williams-Carter-Lewis-Bass-Allen .800 .364 -1 30% 36%   44% -1%

7 Williams-Redick-Q.Richardson-Gortat-Howard .462 .636 +2 69% 0%   71% -8%

8 Duhon-Williams-Pietrus-Bass-Gortat .455 .364 -2 18% 27%   44% +7%

9 Williams-Q.Richardson-Lewis-Bass-Allen .667 .462 +1 33% 38%   29% 0%

10 Williams-Q.Richardson-Pietrus-Lewis-Gortat .333 .429 -1 25% 43%   44% -9%

11 Williams-Redick-Carter-Lewis-Howard .571 .273 +5 29% 45%   38% +1%

12 Williams-Pietrus-Anderson-Bass-Gortat .364 .667 -4 27% 33%   72% -8%

13 Duhon-Williams-Q.Richardson-Clark-Anderson .500 .375 +4 38% 38%   53% +30%

14 Williams-Carter-Q.Richardson-Bass-Gortat .750 .167 -2 50% 50%   25% +11%

15 Williams-Redick-Pietrus-Lewis-Gortat .400 .545 +1 0% 45%   35% -43%

16 Williams-Redick-Carter-Bass-Gortat .750 .286 +3 0% 57%   30% +27%

17 Williams-Redick-Q.Richardson-Allen-Gortat .400 .167 0 20% 17%   71% -7%

18 Williams-Carter-Pietrus-Bass-Gortat .400 .500 0 40% 33%   50% +14%

19 Williams-Redick-Lewis-Gortat-Howard .200 .667 +1 0% 17%   50% -26%

20 Williams-Redick-Lewis-Bass-Gortat .500 .400 +3 17% 80%   50% +35%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	3%	+25	94.9	86.4	8.5	8	4	66%
SG	0%	+9	95.9	78.7	17.3	2	3	40%
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	10.5	.453	.0	6%	6.2	6.6	3.3	.0	1.6	9.5	8.5
SG	11.5	.333	.0	33%	5.8	7.7	1.9	.0	1.9	7.7	9.6
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 17.7 .287 2.6 33% 3.3 7.9 3.9 .0 1.0 11.5 2.2

SG 13.4 .000 .0 0% 5.8 3.8 1.9 .0 1.9 .0 .0

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG -7.2 .166 -2.6 -27% 3.0 -1.3 .7 .0 -.7 -2.0 6.4

SG -1.9 .333 .0 33% .0 3.8 .0 .0 .0 7.7 9.6

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
2%	+3	113.7	85.3	28.4	1	1	50.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 9.5 18.9 .500 .750 100% 0% 0.0 28.4

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 100% .750   100% 0% 1.5

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 50% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 50% 1.500   100% 0% 1.5

Crunch 100% .750   50% 0% 1.5

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	9.5	0.0	2	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	%-18.9	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	4	0.0%	0.0%	2	8	25.0%	75.0%	25.0	75.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-27.4

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	171	3794	4%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	104.4	110.2	-5.8
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	93.9	103.8	-9.8
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+10.4	+6.4	+4.0
Points Scored	339	7796	-7457
Points Allowed	304	7383	-7079
Net Points	+35	+413	-378
Effective FG%	49.5%	52.3%	-2.8%
Effective FG% Allowed	44.8%	47.7%	-2.9%
Assisted Field Goals	53%	55%	-2%
Assisted FG% Allowed	51%	57%	-6%
Own Shots Blocked	5%	4%	+1%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	21.8%	29.3%	-7.5%
Defensive Rebounding	74.9%	73.2%	+1.7%
Total Rebounding	48.3%	51.3%	-2.9%
Stats
Free Throws Made	17	17	+0
Free Throws Attempted	25	25	+0
Free Throws Made by Opp.	15	17	+2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	22	23	+1
Turnovers, on Offense	12	14	+2
Turnovers, on Defense	15	13	+2
Net Turnovers	3	-1	-4
Fouls Committed	17	19	+2
Fouls, Drawn	21	21	+0
Net Fouls	4	2	-2

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts