Jermaine Taylor of the Houston Rockets, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Jermaine Taylor
Houston Rockets
2010-2011 NBA Season

More Jermaine Taylor stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
1%	-14	1.01	1.1	-8.8	3	5	37.5

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.0 4.0 .500 .531 56% 19% .6 4.9

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 50% .500   57% 13% 2.0

Close 41% .462   50% 31% 1.5

Dunk 6% 1.000   100% 0% .5

Tips 3% 1.000   0% 0% .3

Inside 50% .563   56% 25% 2.3

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 41% .769   67% 8% 2.5

11-15 28% .444   25% 11% 1.0

16-20 25% .375   67% 38% .8

21+ 6% .000   0% 50% .0

Crunch 31% .300   50% 40% .8

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
5	6	83.3	3.8	3.1	35	3	8.6%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	2	0	0	2	1	2.0	.0	1.3

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
1	76	1.3%	26.3%	8	62	12.9%	75.8%	14.2	102.1

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	2	0	%	7%	%	2	1.3	1.9%	3	.67	6.2

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	5	0	3.5

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Lee-Taylor-Budinger-Hill-Miller	23	.90	1.19	-14	1	2	33
2	Smith-Lee-Taylor-Hayes-Hill	10	.79	1.33	-13	0	1	0
3	Lee-Taylor-Budinger-Jeffries-Hill	7	1.29	.68	9	1	1	50
4	Lee-Taylor-Budinger-Scola-Miller	6	1.44	.82	7	1	0	100
5	Smith-Taylor-Budinger-Jeffries-Hill	5	.40	.87	-4	0	2	0
6	Smith-Lee-Taylor-Jeffries-Hill	5	1.24	.89	3	1	0	100
7	Lee-Taylor-Budinger-Jeffries-Miller	4	.89	1.27	-3	0	1	0
8	Smith-Taylor-Budinger-Hill-Miller	3	1.16	1.51	-2	0	1	0
9	Smith-Lee-Taylor-Scola-Hill	2	1.40	1.33	2	1	0	100
10	Smith-Taylor-Martin-Hayes-Hill	1	1.55	1.29	1	1	0	100
11	Smith-Taylor-Martin-Battier-Scola	1	1.33	1.33	1	1	0	100
12	Smith-Lee-Taylor-Budinger-Jeffries	1	1.67	1.00	3	1	0	100
13	Lowry-Lee-Taylor-Scola-Hill	1	.00	1.00	-2	0	1	0
14	Lee-Taylor-Budinger-Scola-Hill	1	.35	.67	-1	0	1	0
15	Lowry-Lee-Taylor-Hill-Miller	0	.00	1.14	-1	0	1	0
16	Lowry-Taylor-Budinger-Hill-Miller	0	2.27	2.00	0	0	0	0

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Lee-Taylor-Budinger-Hill-Miller .381 .500 -11 50% 34%   56% -9%

2 Smith-Lee-Taylor-Hayes-Hill .412 .556 -5 29% 28%   48% -6%

3 Lee-Taylor-Budinger-Jeffries-Hill .538 .250 0 8% 33%   33% +27%

4 Lee-Taylor-Budinger-Scola-Miller .778 .429 -3 67% 29%   55% +11%

5 Smith-Taylor-Budinger-Jeffries-Hill .091 .286 -3 27% 14%   68% -20%

6 Smith-Lee-Taylor-Jeffries-Hill .455 .571 +2 55% 14%   71% +22%

7 Lee-Taylor-Budinger-Jeffries-Miller .333 1 0 17% 50%   0% +26%

8 Smith-Taylor-Budinger-Hill-Miller .600 .667 -4 20% 33%   67% -14%

9 Smith-Lee-Taylor-Scola-Hill .750 1 -4 0% 100%   50% +6%

10 Smith-Taylor-Martin-Hayes-Hill 1 .250 0 50% 25%   33% -25%

11 Smith-Taylor-Martin-Battier-Scola .500 1 +4 0% 0%   0% +33%

12 Smith-Lee-Taylor-Budinger-Jeffries .667 1 0 0% 0%   0% +50%

13 Lowry-Lee-Taylor-Scola-Hill 0 .333 0 0% 67%   25% 0%

14 Lee-Taylor-Budinger-Scola-Hill 0 .333 +2 50% 100%   25% +33%

15 Lowry-Lee-Taylor-Hill-Miller 0 0 -2 0% 0%   0% 0%

16 Lowry-Taylor-Budinger-Hill-Miller 0 1 +2 0% 100%   0% 0%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG	1%	-6	93.6	98.9	-5.2	3	4	42%
SF	0%	-8	83.5	101.1	-17.6	1	2	33%
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG	21.9	.500	5.2	48%	4.4	.9	4.4	.9	3.5	26.2	11.8
SF	15.4	.643	.0	57%	8.8	2.2	2.2	2.2	.0	19.8	17.6
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG 15.7 .444 7.0 27% 7.0 4.4 2.6 .9 2.6 20.1 14.8

SF 11.0 .600 .0 40% 4.4 4.4 2.2 .0 4.4 13.2 8.9

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG 6.1 .056 -1.7 21% -2.6 -3.5 -1.7 .0 -.9 6.1 -3.0

SF 4.4 .043 .0 17% 4.4 -2.2 .0 2.2 4.4 6.6 8.7

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
0%	0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0	0	0.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	76	3899	1%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	101.8	112.4	-10.6
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	112.6	110.0	+2.6
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-10.8	+2.5	-13.2
Points Scored	145	8540	-8395
Points Allowed	159	8347	-8188
Net Points	-14	+193	-207
Effective FG%	47.3%	50.4%	-3.1%
Effective FG% Allowed	52.3%	50.0%	+2.3%
Assisted Field Goals	57%	61%	-4%
Assisted FG% Allowed	56%	52%	+4%
Own Shots Blocked	10%	6%	+4%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	26.3%	30.2%	-3.9%
Defensive Rebounding	75.8%	70.2%	+5.6%
Total Rebounding	51.1%	50.2%	+0.9%
Stats
Free Throws Made	14	20	-6
Free Throws Attempted	19	25	-6
Free Throws Made by Opp.	26	18	-8
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	33	23	-10
Turnovers, on Offense	13	13	+0
Turnovers, on Defense	15	13	+2
Net Turnovers	2	0	-2
Fouls Committed	23	19	-4
Fouls, Drawn	16	21	-5
Net Fouls	-7	2	+9

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts