Delonte West of the Boston Celtics, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Delonte West
Boston Celtics
2010-2011 NBA Season

More Delonte West stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
11%	-87	0.97	1.06	-9.2	7	16	30.4

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.3 5.0 .458 .508 29% 8% .5 5.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 80% .500   31% 6% 4.0

Close 20% .542   23% 17% 1.1

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 20% .542   23% 17% 1.1

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 35% .512   26% 10% 1.8

11-15 19% .391   11% 9% .8

16-20 21% .520   42% 8% 1.1

21+ 25% .583   33% 7% 1.5

Crunch 46% .555   37% 7% 2.5

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
13	15	86.7	1.6	1.4	125	5	4.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
9	28	21	6	64	18	3.6	7.1	6.8

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
6	374	1.6%	22.7%	32	412	7.8%	70.4%	9.4	93.1

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
5	4	1	1%	2%	5%	10	1.1	1.4%	10	1.00	3.5

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
4	18	8	0	15.9

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	West-Allen-Green-Davis-Krstic	34	1.00	1.03	-5	3	2	60
2	West-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Davis	26	.95	1.06	-5	1	3	25
3	Rondo-West-Green-Davis-Krstic	23	.83	1.03	-4	3	4	42
4	West-Allen-Green-Garnett-Davis	19	1.46	1.00	12	5	3	62
5	Robinson-West-Daniels-Davis-Erden	18	1.22	.82	12	2	1	66
6	Rondo-West-Pierce-Green-Davis	17	.89	1.57	-24	1	6	14
7	West-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Krstic	14	1.22	.78	13	2	0	100
8	Arroyo-West-Green-Murphy-Davis	11	.68	.96	-6	1	2	33
9	West-Wafer-Green-Davis-J.O'Neal	11	1.17	.41	18	1	0	100
10	West-Allen-Green-Davis-J.O'Neal	10	1.45	1.39	1	1	1	50
11	Rondo-West-Allen-Garnett-Davis	9	.95	.87	1	2	2	50
12	West-Allen-Daniels-Davis-Erden	9	.79	1.20	-10	1	2	33
13	Rondo-West-Pierce-Green-Krstic	8	.82	.78	1	1	2	33
14	West-Wafer-Daniels-Davis-Erden	8	.36	.63	-4	0	1	0
15	Robinson-West-Daniels-Davis-S.O'Neal	8	.31	1.21	-14	0	3	0
16	West-Allen-Pierce-Green-Davis	7	1.08	1.27	-2	2	2	50
17	West-Allen-Green-Murphy-Davis	6	1.13	.93	2	2	1	66
18	West-Pierce-Green-Davis-Krstic	6	.82	1.40	-5	1	1	50
19	Arroyo-West-Pierce-Green-Davis	6	.60	.87	-3	2	2	50
20	Rondo-West-Pierce-Davis-Erden	6	1.63	1.27	3	1	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 West-Allen-Green-Davis-Krstic .438 .489 -2 29% 26%   55% -1%

2 West-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Davis .378 .412 -6 24% 38%   45% +15%

3 Rondo-West-Green-Davis-Krstic .303 .472 +14 24% 42%   54% -6%

4 West-Allen-Green-Garnett-Davis .643 .441 +8 25% 24%   54% +8%

5 Robinson-West-Daniels-Davis-Erden .593 .458 +3 37% 25%   65% +6%

6 Rondo-West-Pierce-Green-Davis .464 .563 -13 18% 31%   30% -10%

7 West-Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Krstic .545 .304 +2 41% 17%   41% +11%

8 Arroyo-West-Green-Murphy-Davis .417 .364 +2 58% 23%   39% -24%

9 West-Wafer-Green-Davis-J.O'Neal .550 .167 +3 45% 17%   63% +1%

10 West-Allen-Green-Davis-J.O'Neal .692 .533 0 15% 20%   50% -6%

11 Rondo-West-Allen-Garnett-Davis .571 .400 -4 64% 47%   33% +4%

12 West-Allen-Daniels-Davis-Erden .400 .643 -3 47% 21%   65% -8%

13 Rondo-West-Pierce-Green-Krstic .556 .250 -8 22% 17%   38% -19%

14 West-Wafer-Daniels-Davis-Erden 0 .308 +6 25% 38%   45% -11%

15 Robinson-West-Daniels-Davis-S.O'Neal .125 .500 0 0% 19%   33% -25%

16 West-Allen-Pierce-Green-Davis .583 .438 -1 33% 50%   17% +8%

17 West-Allen-Green-Murphy-Davis .667 .455 -1 44% 45%   50% -17%

18 West-Pierce-Green-Davis-Krstic .400 .500 0 50% 25%   42% -18%

19 Arroyo-West-Pierce-Green-Davis .273 .444 +3 36% 11%   71% 0%

20 Rondo-West-Pierce-Davis-Erden .889 .600 0 44% 10%   57% -1%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	5%	-18	85.0	88.8	-3.8	8	11	42%
SG	5%	-68	80.0	94.9	-14.9	6	15	28%
SF	0%	-1	55.8	67.0	-11.2		1	0%
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	13.8	.508	2.1	21%	5.0	9.4	3.8	1.5	3.1	15.9	15.6
SG	11.2	.539	1.1	19%	3.1	4.2	2.6	.7	3.1	12.9	10.9
SF	33.5	.000	.0	0%	.0	.0	.0	.0	.0	.0	.0
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 13.4   .414   5.7   18% 5.2   7.3   3.4   .2   2.7   16.2   13.2

SG 18.6   .529   3.1   17% 5.0   5.3   3.5   .2   2.6   22.6   17.5

SF 11.2   .000   .0   0% 22.3   .0   .0   .0   .0   .0   .0

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG .4 .094 -3.6 3% -.2 2.1 -.4 1.3 -.4 -.2 2.4

SG -7.4 .010 -2.0 2% -2.0 -1.1 .9 .4 -.4 -9.6 -6.6

SF 22.3 .000 .0 0% -22.3 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
5%	0	80.3	80.3	0.0	1	2	33.3%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 5.0 20.1 .250 .000 0% 0% 10.0 10.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 100% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 50% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 25% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 25% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 50% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	2	100.0	10.0	10.0	4	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	%-10.0	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
1	9	11.1%	44.4%	1	12	8.3%	50.0%	19.4	94.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-13.1

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	452	3503	11%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	96.2	109.0	-12.8
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	106.8	100.8	+6.0
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-10.5	+8.2	-18.8
Points Scored	775	7138	-6363
Points Allowed	862	6611	-5749
Net Points	-87	+527	-614
Effective FG%	47.4%	52.4%	-5.0%
Effective FG% Allowed	48.1%	46.8%	+1.4%
Assisted Field Goals	57%	64%	-7%
Assisted FG% Allowed	53%	55%	-2%
Own Shots Blocked	7%	5%	+2%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	22.7%	24.6%	-1.8%
Defensive Rebounding	70.4%	72.3%	-1.9%
Total Rebounding	46.6%	48.4%	-1.9%
Stats
Free Throws Made	16	17	-1
Free Throws Attempted	22	23	-1
Free Throws Made by Opp.	19	17	-2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	25	23	-2
Turnovers, on Offense	15	14	-1
Turnovers, on Defense	14	15	-1
Net Turnovers	-1	1	+2
Fouls Committed	21	20	-1
Fouls, Drawn	18	20	-2
Net Fouls	-3	0	+3

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts