Beno Udrih of the Sacramento Kings, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Beno Udrih
Sacramento Kings
2009-2010 NBA Season

More Beno Udrih stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
62%	-178	1.06	1.11	-3.4	28	49	36.4

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 5.3 10.6 .493 .538 41% 3% 1.5 12.9

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 78% .491   42% 2% 8.2

Close 22% .710   39% 6% 3.3

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 22% .707   39% 6% 3.3

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 35% .589   37% 2% 4.4

11-15 24% .505   41% 3% 2.6

16-20 22% .533   45% 4% 2.5

21+ 19% .490   46% 3% 1.9

Crunch 40% .513   46% 4% 4.4

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
118	141	83.7	2.7	2.3	884	43	4.9%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
80	139	111	42	372	88	4.2	8.4	7.2

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
38	2454	1.5%	30.5%	180	2340	7.7%	71.4%	9.2	101.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
5	5	0	0%	0%	0%	10	0.2	0.2%	88	0.11	0.5

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
5	88	42	1	21.8

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Udrih-Evans-Greene-Landry-Hawes	118	.98	1.07	-15	4	8	33
2	Udrih-Evans-Nocioni-Landry-Thompson	106	1.10	1.21	-26	4	8	33
3	Udrih-Evans-Nocioni-Thompson-Hawes	101	1.07	1.08	-4	6	6	50
4	Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Thompson-Hawes	83	.99	1.18	-24	4	10	28
5	Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Landry-Hawes	80	1.00	1.03	-11	2	3	40
6	Udrih-Casspi-Greene-Thompson-Hawes	54	.93	1.03	-12	2	4	33
7	Udrih-Garcia-Greene-Landry-Hawes	48	1.13	1.24	-14	3	4	42
8	Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Nocioni-Thompson	46	1.19	1.15	8	8	5	61
9	Udrih-Evans-Greene-Thompson-Hawes	44	1.11	1.11	-5	4	4	50
10	Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Greene-Thompson	40	.82	.90	-3	5	6	45
11	Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Landry-Thompson	37	1.02	1.03	-3	3	2	60
12	Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Brockman-Thompson	31	1.17	1.15	5	4	2	66
13	Udrih-Evans-Udoka-Landry-Hawes	31	1.02	1.01	-3	3	2	60
14	Udrih-Evans-Greene-Landry-Thompson	29	1.05	1.25	-8	3	4	42
15	Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Brockman-Hawes	28	.95	1.24	-16	3	7	30
16	Udrih-Udoka-Casspi-Nocioni-Thompson	26	1.30	.95	19	5	3	62
17	Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Nocioni-Hawes	26	1.23	1.05	8	5	1	83
18	Udrih-Casspi-Nocioni-Thompson-Hawes	24	1.36	1.14	9	3	2	60
19	Udrih-Evans-Udoka-Nocioni-Thompson	23	1.07	1.33	-11	2	7	22
20	Udrih-Evans-Udoka-Thompson-Hawes	23	.98	.94	4	5	2	71

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Udrih-Evans-Greene-Landry-Hawes .450 .470 -4 42% 36%   52% -3%

2 Udrih-Evans-Nocioni-Landry-Thompson .481 .529 -4 36% 34%   51% -2%

3 Udrih-Evans-Nocioni-Thompson-Hawes .494 .465 -18 39% 44%   49% -1%

4 Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Thompson-Hawes .424 .490 -3 38% 45%   50% -4%

5 Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Landry-Hawes .453 .446 -15 41% 41%   45% +5%

6 Udrih-Casspi-Greene-Thompson-Hawes .477 .485 +8 41% 41%   46% -5%

7 Udrih-Garcia-Greene-Landry-Hawes .489 .524 -18 41% 45%   50% +2%

8 Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Nocioni-Thompson .456 .447 -9 41% 30%   50% +5%

9 Udrih-Evans-Greene-Thompson-Hawes .513 .456 -12 54% 32%   51% -5%

10 Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Greene-Thompson .414 .400 -8 41% 31%   47% -5%

11 Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Landry-Thompson .527 .448 +8 47% 24%   50% +3%

12 Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Brockman-Thompson .436 .490 +12 25% 22%   55% +3%

13 Udrih-Evans-Udoka-Landry-Hawes .449 .418 +8 37% 36%   51% 0%

14 Udrih-Evans-Greene-Landry-Thompson .449 .535 -1 29% 21%   52% -1%

15 Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Brockman-Hawes .373 .511 -7 39% 33%   51% 0%

16 Udrih-Udoka-Casspi-Nocioni-Thompson .585 .425 -16 42% 40%   58% +6%

17 Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Nocioni-Hawes .563 .469 -3 44% 51%   38% +9%

18 Udrih-Casspi-Nocioni-Thompson-Hawes .634 .444 -10 34% 31%   47% -6%

19 Udrih-Evans-Udoka-Nocioni-Thompson .400 .556 -3 36% 33%   69% -11%

20 Udrih-Evans-Udoka-Thompson-Hawes .459 .394 -4 41% 27%   57% -6%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	57%	-250	98.1	103.4	-5.3	25	52	32%
SG	5%	+71	113.0	96.6	16.4	14	14	50%
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	16.4	.526	2.7	21%	4.1	7.4	2.7	.2	3.2	19.5	17.2
SG	15.0	.677	3.5	23%	5.1	5.3	2.3	.0	3.2	23.3	21.7
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 17.9 .479 4.4 27% 4.7 8.4 3.0 .1 2.9 20.9 17.9

SG 14.3 .460 5.3 27% 5.1 2.5 3.0 .9 3.9 17.1 11.2

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG -1.5 .047 -1.8 -6% -.5 -1.1 .3 .1 -.3 -1.4 -.6

SG .7 .217 -1.8 -4% .0 2.8 .7 -.9 .7 6.2 10.5

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
88%	-62	89.4	107.3	-17.8	16	27	37.2%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 5.5 13.8 .396 .438 58% 6% 5.2 17.3

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 85% .390   64% 7% 0.7

Close 15% .714   40% 0% 0.2

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 15% .714   40% 0% 0.2

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 23% .636   67% 0% 0.3

11-15 17% .563   75% 0% 0.2

16-20 25% .500   33% 8% 0.3

21+ 35% .206   67% 12% 0.2

Crunch 60% .328   44% 10% 0.4

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
18	20	90.0	5.8	5.2	49	1	2.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
4	5	3	3	15	1	15.0	7.2	4.3

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
5	183	2.7%	33.9%	13	164	7.9%	63.4%	10.7	97.3

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	0	0	1%	0%	0%	1	0.3	0.4%	2	0.50	0.6

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	2	0	23.0

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	2477	1498	62%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	106.7	105.9	+0.8
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	111.5	110.2	+1.3
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-4.9	-4.3	-0.5
Points Scored	5130	3070	+2060
Points Allowed	5308	3250	+2058
Net Points	-178	-180	+2
Effective FG%	49.4%	48.5%	+0.9%
Effective FG% Allowed	50.9%	49.9%	+0.9%
Assisted Field Goals	53%	52%	+1%
Assisted FG% Allowed	52%	53%	-1%
Own Shots Blocked	6%	7%	-1%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	30.5%	29.7%	+0.9%
Defensive Rebounding	71.4%	70.7%	+0.7%
Total Rebounding	51.0%	50.2%	+0.8%
Stats
Free Throws Made	17	17	+0
Free Throws Attempted	23	23	+0
Free Throws Made by Opp.	19	20	+1
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	25	26	+1
Turnovers, on Offense	15	14	-1
Turnovers, on Defense	13	13	+0
Net Turnovers	-2	-1	+1
Fouls Committed	22	21	-1
Fouls, Drawn	19	19	+0
Net Fouls	-3	-2	+1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts