Sergio Rodriguez of the Sacramento Kings, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Sergio Rodriguez
Sacramento Kings
2009-2010 NBA Season

More Sergio Rodriguez stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
13%	+108	1.15	1.05	10.0	19	16	54.3

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 2.3 4.9 .463 .503 31% 11% 1.1 6.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 60% .452   45% 8% 2.6

Close 39% .587   16% 15% 2.3

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 1% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 40% .579   16% 14% 2.3

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 36% .601   28% 9% 2.1

11-15 23% .442   28% 19% 1.0

16-20 26% .449   30% 8% 1.1

21+ 15% .448   45% 7% 0.7

Crunch 41% .449   35% 8% 1.8

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
43	62	69.4	5.8	4.0	215	25	11.6%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
40	23	45	12	120	41	2.9	11.1	11.1

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
15	473	3.2%	32.8%	35	518	6.8%	70.8%	9.9	103.6

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	3	0	0%	1%	0%	3	0.3	0.4%	11	0.27	1.1

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
5	41	13	0	22.5

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Rodriguez-Udrih-Casspi-Nocioni-Thompson	18	1.26	.91	18	4	2	66
2	Rodriguez-Udoka-Casspi-Greene-Brockman	14	1.06	1.37	-13	1	2	33
3	Rodriguez-Evans-Casspi-Greene-Brockman	12	1.16	.83	8	2	1	66
4	Rodriguez-Udrih-Casspi-Nocioni-Hawes	11	1.40	.84	15	3	0	100
5	Rodriguez-Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Thompson	10	1.28	1.25	0	2	3	40
6	Rodriguez-Evans-Casspi-Brockman-Thompson	10	1.49	.74	14	2	0	100
7	Rodriguez-Martin-Casspi-Nocioni-Hawes	10	1.33	.97	8	2	0	100
8	Rodriguez-Martin-Casspi-Nocioni-Brockman	10	1.65	1.18	7	1	1	50
9	Rodriguez-Evans-Greene-Brockman-Thompson	9	1.94	1.03	18	3	0	100
10	Rodriguez-Udrih-Casspi-Thompson-Hawes	9	1.04	.92	1	2	3	40
11	Rodriguez-Evans-Nocioni-Thomas-Hawes	8	1.21	1.13	0	0	0	0
12	Rodriguez-Udoka-Casspi-Nocioni-Thompson	8	.70	1.02	-4	2	2	50
13	Rodriguez-Casspi-Greene-Armstrong-Hawes	8	1.21	1.06	2	1	0	100
14	Rodriguez-Udoka-Casspi-Thompson-Hawes	8	.74	1.53	-16	2	3	40
15	Rodriguez-Casspi-Greene-Thompson-Hawes	8	1.14	.69	6	2	0	100
16	Rodriguez-Evans-Casspi-Nocioni-Thompson	8	1.02	1.21	-6	1	3	25
17	Rodriguez-Udrih-Evans-Thomas-Thompson	8	1.06	.99	1	1	3	25
18	Rodriguez-Udrih-Evans-Brockman-Thompson	8	.97	.86	2	1	2	33
19	Rodriguez-Evans-Greene-Thomas-Thompson	7	.84	.93	-2	0	2	0
20	Rodriguez-Udrih-Casspi-Greene-Thompson	7	1.13	.87	5	2	0	100

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Rodriguez-Udrih-Casspi-Nocioni-Thompson .500 .355 +2 39% 42%   58% +5%

2 Rodriguez-Udoka-Casspi-Greene-Brockman .310 .667 +2 38% 46%   65% -2%

3 Rodriguez-Evans-Casspi-Greene-Brockman .440 .280 -1 52% 52%   49% +5%

4 Rodriguez-Udrih-Casspi-Nocioni-Hawes .647 .391 +12 35% 35%   47% +4%

5 Rodriguez-Udrih-Evans-Casspi-Thompson .563 .522 +8 25% 48%   51% -13%

6 Rodriguez-Evans-Casspi-Brockman-Thompson .524 .375 +3 57% 38%   90% -6%

7 Rodriguez-Martin-Casspi-Nocioni-Hawes .538 .467 +6 31% 33%   50% +1%

8 Rodriguez-Martin-Casspi-Nocioni-Brockman .632 .462 -8 32% 23%   59% +14%

9 Rodriguez-Evans-Greene-Brockman-Thompson .778 .263 -3 28% 32%   59% 0%

10 Rodriguez-Udrih-Casspi-Thompson-Hawes .444 .381 -1 44% 43%   53% -11%

11 Rodriguez-Evans-Nocioni-Thomas-Hawes .467 .500 0 27% 19%   52% -1%

12 Rodriguez-Udoka-Casspi-Nocioni-Thompson .353 .412 -6 47% 29%   50% -25%

13 Rodriguez-Casspi-Greene-Armstrong-Hawes .692 .533 +8 54% 27%   55% +5%

14 Rodriguez-Udoka-Casspi-Thompson-Hawes .455 .714 -4 18% 43%   71% -35%

15 Rodriguez-Casspi-Greene-Thompson-Hawes .583 .364 0 17% 18%   38% +24%

16 Rodriguez-Evans-Casspi-Nocioni-Thompson .538 .600 +2 54% 27%   43% +9%

17 Rodriguez-Udrih-Evans-Thomas-Thompson .471 .600 -5 41% 70%   53% +18%

18 Rodriguez-Udrih-Evans-Brockman-Thompson .538 .375 -2 62% 38%   48% -12%

19 Rodriguez-Evans-Greene-Thomas-Thompson .364 .455 0 27% 27%   36% +22%

20 Rodriguez-Udrih-Casspi-Greene-Thompson .467 .364 -4 33% 18%   57% +1%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	13%	+107	110.6	100.6	10.0	19	16	54%
SG
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	17.6	.503	5.8	40%	4.6	11.1	5.5	.3	4.3	21.7	18.7
SG
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 17.7 .440 4.7 27% 3.7 6.9 3.5 .4 3.4 19.4 14.9

SG

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG -.1 .063 1.0 13% .9 4.3 -2.0 -.1 -.8 2.3 3.9

SG

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
6%	-6	123.6	148.3	-24.7	2	6	25.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 4.1 28.8 .143 .143 100% 14% 8.2 16.5

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 43% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 43% .333   100% 33% 0.2

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Tips 14% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 57% .250   100% 25% 0.2

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 14% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 29% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 14% .000   0% 100% 0.0

21+ 43% .333   100% 0% 0.2

Crunch 57% .250   50% 25% 0.2

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
2	4	50.0	16.5	8.2	7	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	-8.2	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
1	14	7.1%	28.6%	1	12	8.3%	66.7%	15.5	95.2

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	-8.9

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	516	3458	13%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	115.2	105.0	+10.2
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	105.7	111.8	-6.1
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+9.5	-6.8	+16.3
Points Scored	1191	7009	-5818
Points Allowed	1083	7475	-6392
Net Points	+108	-466	+574
Effective FG%	55.5%	48.2%	+7.4%
Effective FG% Allowed	48.3%	50.8%	-2.5%
Assisted Field Goals	56%	52%	+4%
Assisted FG% Allowed	51%	52%	-1%
Own Shots Blocked	6%	6%	+0%
Shots Blocked	5%	5%	+0%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	32.8%	29.8%	+2.9%
Defensive Rebounding	70.8%	71.2%	-0.3%
Total Rebounding	51.8%	50.5%	+1.3%
Stats
Free Throws Made	19	16	+3
Free Throws Attempted	27	23	+4
Free Throws Made by Opp.	21	19	-2
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	28	25	-3
Turnovers, on Offense	17	14	-3
Turnovers, on Defense	16	13	+3
Net Turnovers	-1	-1	+0
Fouls Committed	24	21	-3
Fouls, Drawn	21	19	+2
Net Fouls	-3	-2	+1

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts