free NBA basketball picks
Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Services | Contact Us

Utah Jazz
2006-2007 NBA Season Stats
Jazz home page

Floor Time stats | 5-Man Units | Team Stats | W-L Profiles | By Position

Top Five-Man Floor Units
#
Unit
Min
Off
Def
+/-
W
L
Win%
1
 Williams-Fisher-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur 758  1602  1541  +61   29   21  
58.0
2
 Williams-Fisher-Harpring-Boozer-Okur 166  392  385  +7   15   20  
42.8
3
 Williams-Harpring-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur 144  327  311  +16   10   14  
41.6
4
 Williams-Giricek-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur 128  270  262  +8   10   11  
47.6
5
 Williams-Brewer-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur 101  190  235  -45   5   11  
31.2
6
 Fisher-Giricek-Harpring-Millsap-Collins 99  162  174  -12   8   13  
38.0
7
 Williams-Miles-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur 88  164  169  -5   4   5  
44.4
8
 Williams-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Okur 80  158  159  -1   13   8  
61.9
9
 Williams-Giricek-Harpring-Millsap-Collins 78  147  148  -1   9   13  
40.9
10
 Williams-Fisher-Kirilenko-Okur-Collins 75  133  143  -10   3   4  
42.8
11
 Williams-Giricek-Harpring-Millsap-Okur 67  147  147  +0   11   10  
52.3
12
 Williams-Fisher-Harpring-Millsap-Okur 66  146  158  -12   9   11  
45.0
13
 Williams-Fisher-Kirilenko-Millsap-Okur 61  119  138  -19   4   10  
28.5
14
 Fisher-Giricek-Harpring-Millsap-Okur 58  130  93  +37   11   8  
57.8
15
 Williams-Miles-Brewer-Boozer-Okur 55  98  125  -27   0   5  
0.0
16
 Williams-Harpring-Millsap-Boozer-Okur 51  133  132  +1   4   4  
50.0
17
 Fisher-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Okur 45  93  97  -4   7   8  
46.6
18
 Williams-Fisher-Harpring-Millsap-Collins 43  98  59  +39   9   3  
75.0
19
 Williams-Harpring-Kirilenko-Millsap-Boozer 43  103  85  +18   4   5  
44.4
20
 Williams-Harpring-Kirilenko-Millsap-Okur 40  88  81  +7   5   6  
45.4


Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details
#
Unit
eFG
eFGA
FTA
Close
dClose
Reb
T/O
1
 Williams-Fisher-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur .533  .495  +81  40%  35%   97%  -1% 
2
 Williams-Fisher-Harpring-Boozer-Okur .493  .525  -16  43%  34%   106%  +3% 
3
 Williams-Harpring-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur .488  .448  -22  37%  36%   107%  0% 
4
 Williams-Giricek-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur .545  .502  -10  42%  36%   100%  -2% 
5
 Williams-Brewer-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur .461  .522  -1  35%  48%   88%  -6% 
6
 Fisher-Giricek-Harpring-Millsap-Collins .363  .474  +5  28%  31%   113%  +5% 
7
 Williams-Miles-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur .445  .458  -8  39%  40%   98%  +4% 
8
 Williams-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Okur .508  .473  -9  37%  39%   107%  -6% 
9
 Williams-Giricek-Harpring-Millsap-Collins .500  .538  -20  29%  31%   101%  +3% 
10
 Williams-Fisher-Kirilenko-Okur-Collins .461  .505  -3  36%  30%   107%  -3% 
11
 Williams-Giricek-Harpring-Millsap-Okur .550  .514  -14  32%  40%   120%  -7% 
12
 Williams-Fisher-Harpring-Millsap-Okur .517  .605  +3  33%  38%   106%  +4% 
13
 Williams-Fisher-Kirilenko-Millsap-Okur .455  .529  -2  38%  43%   96%  +3% 
14
 Fisher-Giricek-Harpring-Millsap-Okur .533  .448  +19  29%  31%   110%  +6% 
15
 Williams-Miles-Brewer-Boozer-Okur .489  .516  -16  41%  35%   94%  -10% 
16
 Williams-Harpring-Millsap-Boozer-Okur .662  .564  -5  30%  28%   124%  -11% 
17
 Fisher-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Okur .419  .441  -10  32%  43%   104%  +2% 
18
 Williams-Fisher-Harpring-Millsap-Collins .563  .352  +5  32%  30%   113%  +7% 
19
 Williams-Harpring-Kirilenko-Millsap-Boozer .583  .471  +3  56%  28%   106%  -7% 
20
 Williams-Harpring-Kirilenko-Millsap-Okur .507  .518  -6  35%  29%   119%  +6% 

    Legend:
  • Min = the total minutes the unit was on the floor.

  • Off = the unit's points scored.

  • Def = the unit's points allowed.

  • +/- = the team net points for the unit.

  • W = number of games a unit outscored its opponents while on the court.

  • L = number of games a unit was outscored by its opponents while on the court.

  • Win% = the winning percentage for the unit based on Wins versus Losses.
  • eFG = the effective shooting percentage, adjusted for the value of 3-point shots.
  • eFGA = the effective shooting percentage allowed to opponents.
  • FTA = net free throw attempts.
  • Close = the percentage of shots taken from close range.
  • dClose = the percentage of opponents' shots taken from close range.
  • Reb = the rebound percentage for the unit, based on chances.
  • T/O = the net turnover percentage for the unit based on opponent turnovers minus unit turnovers.

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts

Copyright 2006-07 by 82games.com, All Rights Reserved