free NBA basketball picks
Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Services | Contact Us

Indiana Pacers
2006-2007 NBA Season Stats
Pacers home page

Floor Time stats | 5-Man Units | Team Stats | W-L Profiles | By Position

Top Five-Man Floor Units
#
Unit
Min
Off
Def
+/-
W
L
Win%
1
 Tinsley-Dunleavy-Granger-Murphy-O'Neal 322  670  659  +11   16   8  
66.6
2
 Tinsley-Jackson-Harrington-O'Neal-Foster 272  546  536  +10   11   8  
57.8
3
 Tinsley-Jackson-Granger-Harrington-O'Neal 234  464  455  +9   13   13  
50.0
4
 Tinsley-Dunleavy-Granger-O'Neal-Foster 191  364  368  -4   8   9  
47.0
5
 Tinsley-Dunleavy-Granger-Murphy-Foster 98  216  217  -1   5   8  
38.4
6
 Tinsley-Jackson-Granger-O'Neal-Foster 91  190  176  +14   13   9  
59.0
7
 Armstrong-Dunleavy-Granger-Murphy-O'Neal 83  173  185  -12   3   8  
27.2
8
 McLeod-Dunleavy-Granger-Murphy-O'Neal 66  144  124  +20   5   1  
83.3
9
 Tinsley-Daniels-Granger-O'Neal-Foster 60  126  135  -9   3   7  
30.0
10
 Tinsley-Jackson-Granger-Harrington-Foster 55  110  134  -24   4   8  
33.3
11
 McLeod-Dunleavy-Granger-O'Neal-Foster 54  93  97  -4   2   3  
40.0
12
 Tinsley-Daniels-Granger-Harrington-O'Neal 46  86  94  -8   5   5  
50.0
13
 Tinsley-Dunleavy-Granger-Diogu-Murphy 42  78  86  -8   2   6  
25.0
14
 Armstrong-Williams-Dunleavy-Diogu-Murphy 42  85  71  +14   5   3  
62.5
15
 Armstrong-Williams-Granger-Diogu-Murphy 33  70  71  -1   5   4  
55.5
16
 Armstrong-Jasikevicius-Granger-Harrington-Foster 31  65  57  +8   5   4  
55.5
17
 McLeod-Dunleavy-Granger-Diogu-Murphy 31  66  57  +9   3   1  
75.0
18
 Armstrong-Williams-Granger-Murphy-O'Neal 30  70  65  +5   4   6  
40.0
19
 Tinsley-Jackson-Granger-Baston-Harrington 29  57  69  -12   3   6  
33.3
20
 Armstrong-Dunleavy-Granger-Murphy-Foster 29  56  66  -10   4   4  
50.0


Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details
#
Unit
eFG
eFGA
FTA
Close
dClose
Reb
T/O
1
 Tinsley-Dunleavy-Granger-Murphy-O'Neal .496  .477  -11  27%  31%   89%  +1% 
2
 Tinsley-Jackson-Harrington-O'Neal-Foster .490  .481  -19  37%  33%   105%  -1% 
3
 Tinsley-Jackson-Granger-Harrington-O'Neal .477  .478  -29  29%  32%   90%  +6% 
4
 Tinsley-Dunleavy-Granger-O'Neal-Foster .498  .500  -11  27%  28%   105%  +1% 
5
 Tinsley-Dunleavy-Granger-Murphy-Foster .478  .551  -17  26%  34%   114%  +1% 
6
 Tinsley-Jackson-Granger-O'Neal-Foster .465  .470  +36  39%  36%   109%  0% 
7
 Armstrong-Dunleavy-Granger-Murphy-O'Neal .504  .551  -5  26%  30%   99%  -2% 
8
 McLeod-Dunleavy-Granger-Murphy-O'Neal .518  .441  +11  24%  36%   101%  -4% 
9
 Tinsley-Daniels-Granger-O'Neal-Foster .442  .594  +24  31%  37%   108%  +1% 
10
 Tinsley-Jackson-Granger-Harrington-Foster .441  .495  -5  40%  30%   114%  -14% 
11
 McLeod-Dunleavy-Granger-O'Neal-Foster .398  .478  +6  34%  39%   110%  0% 
12
 Tinsley-Daniels-Granger-Harrington-O'Neal .461  .440  -4  29%  46%   102%  -9% 
13
 Tinsley-Dunleavy-Granger-Diogu-Murphy .373  .446  -8  41%  28%   102%  +2% 
14
 Armstrong-Williams-Dunleavy-Diogu-Murphy .465  .393  +3  26%  33%   115%  -3% 
15
 Armstrong-Williams-Granger-Diogu-Murphy .556  .530  -7  13%  42%   95%  +5% 
16
 Armstrong-Jasikevicius-Granger-Harrington-Foster .588  .395  -19  29%  30%   127%  -9% 
17
 McLeod-Dunleavy-Granger-Diogu-Murphy .510  .457  -4  32%  33%   121%  -11% 
18
 Armstrong-Williams-Granger-Murphy-O'Neal .588  .543  -7  20%  37%   89%  +8% 
19
 Tinsley-Jackson-Granger-Baston-Harrington .453  .578  +6  28%  29%   98%  -10% 
20
 Armstrong-Dunleavy-Granger-Murphy-Foster .560  .596  7%  40%   100%  -2% 

    Legend:
  • Min = the total minutes the unit was on the floor.

  • Off = the unit's points scored.

  • Def = the unit's points allowed.

  • +/- = the team net points for the unit.

  • W = number of games a unit outscored its opponents while on the court.

  • L = number of games a unit was outscored by its opponents while on the court.

  • Win% = the winning percentage for the unit based on Wins versus Losses.
  • eFG = the effective shooting percentage, adjusted for the value of 3-point shots.
  • eFGA = the effective shooting percentage allowed to opponents.
  • FTA = net free throw attempts.
  • Close = the percentage of shots taken from close range.
  • dClose = the percentage of opponents' shots taken from close range.
  • Reb = the rebound percentage for the unit, based on chances.
  • T/O = the net turnover percentage for the unit based on opponent turnovers minus unit turnovers.

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts

Copyright 2006-07 by 82games.com, All Rights Reserved