free NBA basketball picks
Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Premium Services | Contact Us

Utah Jazz
2004-2005 NBA Season Stats
Jazz home page

Floor Time stats | 5-Man Units | Team Stats | W-L Profiles | By Position

Top Five-Man Floor Units
#
Unit
Min
Off
Def
+/-
W
L
Win%
1
 Arroyo-Bell-Harpring-Boozer-Okur 158  323  329  -6   5   7  
41.6
2
 Arroyo-Giricek-Kirilenko-Boozer-Collins 105  199  189  +10   5   2  
71.4
3
 McLeod-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Borchardt 103  195  202  -7   4   5  
44.4
4
 Eisley-Bell-Harpring-Kirilenko-Okur 100  193  165  +28   11   11  
50.0
5
 McLeod-Bell-Harpring-Kirilenko-Okur 99  182  184  -2   6   8  
42.8
6
 McLeod-Giricek-Harpring-Okur-Collins 96  196  198  -2   6   6  
50.0
7
 McLeod-Bell-Harpring-Kirilenko-Borchardt 77  123  151  -28   3   5  
37.5
8
 McLeod-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Okur 73  143  148  -5   7   7  
50.0
9
 Eisley-Bell-Harpring-Boozer-Okur 65  125  168  -43   5   12  
29.4
10
 McLeod-Giricek-Kirilenko-Boozer-Collins 61  133  117  +16   3   3  
50.0
11
 McLeod-Bell-Harpring-Kirilenko-Collins 54  104  121  -17   3   3  
50.0
12
 Eisley-Giricek-Harpring-Okur-Collins 51  106  103  +3   4   7  
36.3
13
 McLeod-Bell-Harpring-Boozer-Okur 44  92  100  -8   5   4  
55.5
14
 Arroyo-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Okur 39  87  101  -14   6   7  
46.1
15
 Eisley-Bell-Harpring-Okur-Borchardt 38  72  80  -8   3   4  
42.8
16
 Lopez-Bell-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur 36  86  62  +24   2   1  
66.6
17
 Eisley-Giricek-Harpring-Kirilenko-Okur 36  77  63  +14   5   3  
62.5
18
 Eisley-Bell-Harpring-Kirilenko-Boozer 36  79  69  +10   4   6  
40.0
19
 Lopez-Bell-Harpring-Boozer-Okur 35  93  86  +7   4   3  
57.1
20
 Arroyo-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Collins 35  82  93  -11   2   3  
40.0


Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details
#
Unit
eFG
eFGA
FTA
Close
dClose
Reb
T/O
1
 Arroyo-Bell-Harpring-Boozer-Okur .492  .496  +7  34%  32%   97%  +3% 
2
 Arroyo-Giricek-Kirilenko-Boozer-Collins .462  .513  +7  38%  35%   114%  0% 
3
 McLeod-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Borchardt .500  .513  -4  35%  30%   112%  -2% 
4
 Eisley-Bell-Harpring-Kirilenko-Okur .465  .425  +19  34%  29%   95%  +1% 
5
 McLeod-Bell-Harpring-Kirilenko-Okur .457  .442  -3  35%  37%   100%  +3% 
6
 McLeod-Giricek-Harpring-Okur-Collins .461  .513  46%  36%   105%  +2% 
7
 McLeod-Bell-Harpring-Kirilenko-Borchardt .439  .504  -7  31%  32%   102%  -1% 
8
 McLeod-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Okur .496  .505  -16  41%  38%   97%  +3% 
9
 Eisley-Bell-Harpring-Boozer-Okur .434  .601  -9  34%  40%   106%  -10% 
10
 McLeod-Giricek-Kirilenko-Boozer-Collins .586  .440  +4  43%  35%   90%  -3% 
11
 McLeod-Bell-Harpring-Kirilenko-Collins .494  .506  -18  31%  42%   87%  -2% 
12
 Eisley-Giricek-Harpring-Okur-Collins .535  .488  -10  39%  26%   102%  -2% 
13
 McLeod-Bell-Harpring-Boozer-Okur .486  .548  -13  41%  31%   121%  -11% 
14
 Arroyo-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Okur .493  .556  -20  45%  42%   94%  -6% 
15
 Eisley-Bell-Harpring-Okur-Borchardt .444  .526  +4  34%  31%   97%  +3% 
16
 Lopez-Bell-Kirilenko-Boozer-Okur .577  .480  -1  38%  22%   118%  +12% 
17
 Eisley-Giricek-Harpring-Kirilenko-Okur .585  .402  +11  47%  33%   85%  +9% 
18
 Eisley-Bell-Harpring-Kirilenko-Boozer .475  .519  +5  34%  37%   119%  +6% 
19
 Lopez-Bell-Harpring-Boozer-Okur .585  .560  -4  23%  36%   112%  +2% 
20
 Arroyo-Giricek-Harpring-Boozer-Collins .516  .655  -5  37%  24%   105%  +4% 

    Legend:
  • Min = the total minutes the unit was on the floor.

  • Off = the unit's points scored.

  • Def = the unit's points allowed.

  • +/- = the team net points for the unit.

  • W = number of games a unit outscored its opponents while on the court.

  • L = number of games a unit was outscored by its opponents while on the court.

  • Win% = the winning percentage for the unit based on Wins versus Losses.
  • eFG = the effective shooting percentage, adjusted for the value of 3-point shots.
  • eFGA = the effective shooting percentage allowed to opponents.
  • FTA = net free throw attempts.
  • Close = the percentage of shots taken from close range.
  • dClose = the percentage of opponents' shots taken from close range.
  • Reb = the rebound percentage for the unit, based on chances.
  • T/O = the net turnover percentage for the unit based on opponent turnovers minus unit turnovers.

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts

Copyright 2004-05 by 82games.com, All Rights Reserved