free NBA basketball picks
Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Premium Services | Contact Us

New York Knicks
2004-2005 NBA Season Stats
Knicks home page

Floor Time stats | 5-Man Units | Team Stats | W-L Profiles | By Position

Top Five-Man Floor Units
#
Unit
Min
Off
Def
+/-
W
L
Win%
1
 Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Mohammed 501  1029  1056  -27   16   17  
48.4
2
 Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Sweetney 413  807  895  -88   16   24  
40.0
3
 Marbury-Crawford-Ariza-K.Thomas-Mohammed 172  348  372  -24   8   12  
40.0
4
 Marbury-Houston-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Mohammed 149  305  287  +18   6   7  
46.1
5
 Marbury-Crawford-Hardaway-K.Thomas-Mohammed 82  169  139  +30   8   1  
88.8
6
 Marbury-Houston-Williams-K.Thomas-Mohammed 71  129  152  -23   3   6  
33.3
7
 Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-Rose-K.Thomas 62  121  133  -12   4   6  
40.0
8
 Marbury-Crawford-Rose-K.Thomas-Sweetney 59  139  155  -16   2   6  
25.0
9
 Marbury-Ariza-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Mohammed 59  108  129  -21   4   5  
44.4
10
 Marbury-Crawford-Ariza-K.Thomas-Sweetney 49  114  98  +16   6   7  
46.1
11
 Marbury-Hardaway-Ariza-K.Thomas-Sweetney 49  98  121  -23   4   9  
30.7
12
 Marbury-Crawford-Hardaway-T.Thomas-K.Thomas 47  114  115  -1   2   4  
33.3
13
 Marbury-Crawford-Williams-K.Thomas-Sweetney 44  117  83  +34   7   3  
70.0
14
 Marbury-Crawford-Hardaway-K.Thomas-Sweetney 44  88  101  -13   4   6  
40.0
15
 Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-Rose-Sweetney 43  94  79  +15   3   4  
42.8
16
 Crawford-Jackson-Williams-Rose-Taylor 39  74  63  +11   4   4  
50.0
17
 Marbury-Crawford-Williams-K.Thomas-Mohammed 39  73  83  -10   2   7  
22.2
18
 Marbury-Hardaway-Ariza-Williams-Sweetney 37  98  72  +26   8   3  
72.7
19
 Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-Williams-K.Thomas 37  89  65  +24   9   2  
81.8
20
 Marbury-Hardaway-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Mohammed 37  81  82  -1   3   4  
42.8


Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details
#
Unit
eFG
eFGA
FTA
Close
dClose
Reb
T/O
1
 Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Mohammed .485  .512  -64  27%  33%   100%  +1% 
2
 Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Sweetney .487  .519  -51  32%  35%   93%  -2% 
3
 Marbury-Crawford-Ariza-K.Thomas-Mohammed .484  .497  -2  30%  36%   92%  -1% 
4
 Marbury-Houston-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Mohammed .516  .498  -9  27%  30%   93%  +5% 
5
 Marbury-Crawford-Hardaway-K.Thomas-Mohammed .482  .441  +7  18%  30%   103%  +5% 
6
 Marbury-Houston-Williams-K.Thomas-Mohammed .458  .570  -3  24%  29%   102%  +1% 
7
 Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-Rose-K.Thomas .449  .495  -17  28%  23%   88%  +4% 
8
 Marbury-Crawford-Rose-K.Thomas-Sweetney .595  .624  +2  24%  26%   105%  -8% 
9
 Marbury-Ariza-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Mohammed .522  .543  -15  29%  31%   97%  -5% 
10
 Marbury-Crawford-Ariza-K.Thomas-Sweetney .511  .476  +3  38%  37%   113%  -1% 
11
 Marbury-Hardaway-Ariza-K.Thomas-Sweetney .428  .567  +3  25%  32%   100%  +5% 
12
 Marbury-Crawford-Hardaway-T.Thomas-K.Thomas .477  .492  -19  22%  38%   103%  +1% 
13
 Marbury-Crawford-Williams-K.Thomas-Sweetney .539  .477  +15  36%  32%   112%  +14% 
14
 Marbury-Crawford-Hardaway-K.Thomas-Sweetney .443  .563  +2  26%  37%   91%  +1% 
15
 Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-Rose-Sweetney .585  .500  -2  34%  30%   115%  -3% 
16
 Crawford-Jackson-Williams-Rose-Taylor .563  .438  +12  34%  39%   98%  +6% 
17
 Marbury-Crawford-Williams-K.Thomas-Mohammed .414  .444  -3  27%  40%   84%  +11% 
18
 Marbury-Hardaway-Ariza-Williams-Sweetney .611  .542  +21  46%  37%   96%  +7% 
19
 Marbury-Crawford-T.Thomas-Williams-K.Thomas .487  .450  -5  36%  32%   129%  +5% 
20
 Marbury-Hardaway-T.Thomas-K.Thomas-Mohammed .534  .596  +6  24%  37%   92%  +3% 

    Legend:
  • Min = the total minutes the unit was on the floor.

  • Off = the unit's points scored.

  • Def = the unit's points allowed.

  • +/- = the team net points for the unit.

  • W = number of games a unit outscored its opponents while on the court.

  • L = number of games a unit was outscored by its opponents while on the court.

  • Win% = the winning percentage for the unit based on Wins versus Losses.
  • eFG = the effective shooting percentage, adjusted for the value of 3-point shots.
  • eFGA = the effective shooting percentage allowed to opponents.
  • FTA = net free throw attempts.
  • Close = the percentage of shots taken from close range.
  • dClose = the percentage of opponents' shots taken from close range.
  • Reb = the rebound percentage for the unit, based on chances.
  • T/O = the net turnover percentage for the unit based on opponent turnovers minus unit turnovers.

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts

Copyright 2004-05 by 82games.com, All Rights Reserved